BACKGROUND: Fatal opioid overdose is a significant cause of mortality among injection drug users (IDUs). METHODS: We evaluated an overdose prevention and response training programme for IDUs run by a community-based organisation in Los Angeles, CA. During a 1-h training session participants learned skills to prevent, recognise, and respond to opioid overdoses, including: calling for emergency services, performing rescue breathing, and administering an intramuscular injection of naloxone (an opioid antagonist). Between September 2006 and January 2008, 93 IDUs were trained. Of those, 66 (71%) enrolled in the evaluation study and 47 participants (71%) completed an interview at baseline and 3-month follow-up. RESULTS: Twenty-one percent of participants were female, 42% were white, 29% African American, and 18% Latino. Most were homeless or lived in temporary accommodation (73%). We found significant increases in knowledge about overdose, in particular about the use of naloxone. Twenty-two participants responded to 35 overdoses during the follow-up period. Twenty-six overdose victims recovered, four died, and the outcome of five cases was unknown. Response techniques included: staying with the victim (85%), administering naloxone (80%), providing rescue breathing (66%), and calling emergency services (60%). The average number of appropriate response techniques used by participants increased significantly from baseline to follow-up (p<0.05). Half (53%) of programme participants reported decreased drug use at follow-up. CONCLUSION: Overdose prevention and response training programmes may be associated with improved overdose response behaviour, with few adverse consequences and some unforeseen benefits, such as reductions in personal drug use. Copyright 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
BACKGROUND: Fatal opioid overdose is a significant cause of mortality among injection drug users (IDUs). METHODS: We evaluated an overdose prevention and response training programme for IDUs run by a community-based organisation in Los Angeles, CA. During a 1-h training session participants learned skills to prevent, recognise, and respond to opioid overdoses, including: calling for emergency services, performing rescue breathing, and administering an intramuscular injection of naloxone (an opioid antagonist). Between September 2006 and January 2008, 93 IDUs were trained. Of those, 66 (71%) enrolled in the evaluation study and 47 participants (71%) completed an interview at baseline and 3-month follow-up. RESULTS: Twenty-one percent of participants were female, 42% were white, 29% African American, and 18% Latino. Most were homeless or lived in temporary accommodation (73%). We found significant increases in knowledge about overdose, in particular about the use of naloxone. Twenty-two participants responded to 35 overdoses during the follow-up period. Twenty-six overdose victims recovered, four died, and the outcome of five cases was unknown. Response techniques included: staying with the victim (85%), administering naloxone (80%), providing rescue breathing (66%), and calling emergency services (60%). The average number of appropriate response techniques used by participants increased significantly from baseline to follow-up (p<0.05). Half (53%) of programme participants reported decreased drug use at follow-up. CONCLUSION:Overdose prevention and response training programmes may be associated with improved overdose response behaviour, with few adverse consequences and some unforeseen benefits, such as reductions in personal drug use. Copyright 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Authors: Thomas Kerr; Nadia Fairbairn; Mark Tyndall; David Marsh; Kathy Li; Julio Montaner; Evan Wood Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2006-09-07 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Karen H Seal; Moher Downing; Alex H Kral; Shannon Singleton-Banks; Jon-Paul Hammond; Jennifer Lorvick; Dan Ciccarone; Brian R Edlin Journal: J Urban Health Date: 2003-06 Impact factor: 3.671
Authors: Leo Kobayashi; Traci C Green; Sarah E Bowman; Madeline C Ray; Michelle S McKenzie; Josiah D Rich Journal: Simul Healthc Date: 2017-02 Impact factor: 1.929
Authors: Stephanie M Mathis; Nicholas Hagemeier; Angela Hagaman; John Dreyzehner; Robert P Pack Journal: Curr HIV/AIDS Rep Date: 2018-10 Impact factor: 5.071
Authors: Ernest Drucker; Kenneth Anderson; Robert Haemmig; Robert Heimer; Dan Small; Alex Walley; Evan Wood; Ingrid van Beek Journal: J Bioeth Inq Date: 2016-04-26 Impact factor: 1.352
Authors: Stephen E Lankenau; Karla D Wagner; Karol Silva; Aleksandar Kecojevic; Ellen Iverson; Miles McNeely; Alex H Kral Journal: J Community Health Date: 2013-02