Literature DB >> 19268438

Laboratory defined critical value limits: how do hospital physicians perceive laboratory based critical values?

Andrew C Don-Wauchope1, Vasudhevan T Chetty.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess whether our critical values were viewed as appropriate by our physicians and to assess their understanding of critical values.
METHODS: A web-based survey was prepared. The critical value levels were taken from our current values and select values based on a review of the literature. One of the options in the response for each analyte probed the understanding of the concept of critical value.
RESULTS: There were 115 respondents from a range of disciplines. The results indicated that some (4/11) of our critical values were appropriate however, many required review (7/11). Most respondents (79%) did not fully appreciate the concept of critical value.
CONCLUSIONS: This survey specifically considers physician input for the establishment of critical values. The data enabled our laboratory to better identify critical values and has highlighted the need for physician education in the concept of critical values.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19268438     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2009.02.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Biochem        ISSN: 0009-9120            Impact factor:   3.281


  6 in total

Review 1.  Managing the pre- and post-analytical phases of the total testing process.

Authors:  Robert Hawkins
Journal:  Ann Lab Med       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 3.464

2.  Towards harmonisation of critical laboratory result management - review of the literature and survey of australasian practices.

Authors:  Ca Campbell; Ar Horvath
Journal:  Clin Biochem Rev       Date:  2012-11

3.  Clinician's opinion about critical risk results proposed by the Croatian Chamber of Medical Biochemists: a survey in one Croatian tertiary hospital.

Authors:  Pavica Šonjić; Ana Nikler; Dora Vuljanić; Lora Dukić; Ana-Maria Šimundić
Journal:  Biochem Med (Zagreb)       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 2.313

4.  Critical Value Reporting in Transfusion Medicine: A Survey of Communication Practices in US Facilities.

Authors:  Erika M Reese; Randin C Nelson; Willy A Flegel; Karen M Byrne; Garrett S Booth
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 2.493

5.  Critical Risk Results - An Update on International Initiatives.

Authors:  Q Lam; E Ajzner; C A Campbell; A Young
Journal:  EJIFCC       Date:  2016-02-09

6.  Analysis of laboratory critical values at a referral Spanish tertiary university hospital.

Authors:  Ariadna Arbiol-Roca; Sofía Corral-Comesaña; Ruth Cano-Corres; María José Castro-Castro; Macarena Dastis-Arias; Dolors Dot-Bach
Journal:  Biochem Med (Zagreb)       Date:  2018-12-15       Impact factor: 2.313

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.