Literature DB >> 19268343

Lymph node counts in uterine cancer: a randomized double blind trial.

Joseph T Santoso1, Ali Azadi, Jim Wan, Charles Handorf, Robert L Coleman, Todd D Tillmanns.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Higher number of lymph nodes counts may suggest a more accurate cancer staging. We wish to study whether sending lymph nodes to pathologist in four containers, instead of a single container, yields a higher nodal count.
METHODS: Patients with uterine cancer who underwent abdominal hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy were recruited. The right and left pelvic lymph nodes were collected from four locations (common, external and internal iliac, and obturator). Blinded randomization ex vivo allocated the side of the pelvic nodes specimen which was sent to pathology as one versus four containers. Each patient served as her own control by having the other side of her pelvic nodes sent as four different specimens. The surgeons and pathologists were blinded.
RESULTS: 104 consecutive patients were enrolled. The average age was 61 years old. The patients were predominately Caucasians (69%). The average total pelvic and aortic nodes per patients was 17.8. 54 patients, whose right-sided pelvic nodes were randomized to be sent in a single container, yielded an average of 7.2 right pelvic nodes versus 8.6 left pelvic nodes (p=0.026). 50 patients, whose left-sided pelvic nodes were randomized to be sent in a single container, yielded an average 8.1 right pelvic nodes versus 6.9 left pelvic nodes (p=0.042).
CONCLUSION: The lymph nodes count are higher when surgical nodes were sent as multiple separated instead of single specimens, regardless of the side of the pelvis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19268343     DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.02.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  2 in total

1.  The impact of complete embedding of remaining tissue in gynecological lymph node dissection specimen in surgical pathology on lymph node yield: is it clinically relevant?

Authors:  Julia Andruszkow; Ivo Meinhold-Heerlein; Brigitte Winkler; Benjamin Bruno; Ruth Knüchel; Jörg Jäkel
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2018-04-28       Impact factor: 4.064

2.  Adequate pelvic lymphadenectomy and survival of women with early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Koji Matsuo; Hiroko Machida; Andrea Mariani; Rachel S Mandelbaum; Gretchen E Glaser; Bobbie S Gostout; Lynda D Roman; Jason D Wright
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 4.401

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.