OBJECTIVES: Neuropsychological studies in subjects with bipolar disorder (BD) have reported deficits on a variety of cognitive measures. However, because the majority of subjects were medicated at the time of testing in previous studies, it is currently unclear whether the pattern of deficits reported is related to BD itself or to psychotropic medication. We addressed this issue by examining cognitive performance in a group of unmedicated, currently depressed subjects with BD. METHODS: Forty-nine unmedicated subjects who met DSM-IV criteria for BD, depressed phase, and 55 control subjects participated in this study. Most patients were diagnosed with bipolar II disorder. Performance on emotion-dependent, or 'hot', and emotion-independent, or 'cold', cognitive tasks was assessed using tests from the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery. RESULTS: The groups were well matched with respect to general intelligence and demographic variables. Deficits in the unmedicated depressed BD group were apparent on tests tapping 'hot' cognitive processing, for example the Cambridge Gamble task and the Probabilistic Reversal Learning task. However, other than a deficit on the Spatial Span test in the depressed BD subjects, the groups performed equivalently on most measures of 'cold' cognitive processing, for example visual memory, attention, and working memory. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that deficits on tests involving reward processing, short-term spatial memory storage, and sensitivity to negative feedback in depressed BD subjects represent an effect of the illness itself and not mood-stabilizing medication.
OBJECTIVES: Neuropsychological studies in subjects with bipolar disorder (BD) have reported deficits on a variety of cognitive measures. However, because the majority of subjects were medicated at the time of testing in previous studies, it is currently unclear whether the pattern of deficits reported is related to BD itself or to psychotropic medication. We addressed this issue by examining cognitive performance in a group of unmedicated, currently depressed subjects with BD. METHODS: Forty-nine unmedicated subjects who met DSM-IV criteria for BD, depressed phase, and 55 control subjects participated in this study. Most patients were diagnosed with bipolar II disorder. Performance on emotion-dependent, or 'hot', and emotion-independent, or 'cold', cognitive tasks was assessed using tests from the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery. RESULTS: The groups were well matched with respect to general intelligence and demographic variables. Deficits in the unmedicated depressed BD group were apparent on tests tapping 'hot' cognitive processing, for example the Cambridge Gamble task and the Probabilistic Reversal Learning task. However, other than a deficit on the Spatial Span test in the depressed BD subjects, the groups performed equivalently on most measures of 'cold' cognitive processing, for example visual memory, attention, and working memory. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that deficits on tests involving reward processing, short-term spatial memory storage, and sensitivity to negative feedback in depressed BD subjects represent an effect of the illness itself and not mood-stabilizing medication.
Authors: Lucy J Robinson; Jill M Thompson; Peter Gallagher; Utpal Goswami; Allan H Young; I Nicol Ferrier; P Brian Moore Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2006-03-06 Impact factor: 4.839
Authors: Konstantinos N Fountoulakis; Eduard Vieta; Constantin Bouras; Grigorios Notaridis; Panteleimon Giannakopoulos; George Kaprinis; Hagop Akiskal Journal: Int J Neuropsychopharmacol Date: 2007-05-17 Impact factor: 5.176
Authors: M Kathleen Holmes; Kristine Erickson; David A Luckenbaugh; Wayne C Drevets; Earle E Bain; Dara M Cannon; Joseph Snow; Barbara J Sahakian; Husseini K Manji; Carlos A Zarate Journal: Bipolar Disord Date: 2008-11 Impact factor: 6.744
Authors: Joana V Taylor Tavares; Luke Clark; Dara M Cannon; Kristine Erickson; Wayne C Drevets; Barbara J Sahakian Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2007-09-07 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Ranjita Poudel; Michael C Riedel; Taylor Salo; Jessica S Flannery; Lauren D Hill-Bowen; Simon B Eickhoff; Angela R Laird; Matthew T Sutherland Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2020-02-04 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Daniel P Dickstein; David Axelson; Alexandra B Weissman; Shirley Yen; Jeffrey I Hunt; Benjamin I Goldstein; Tina R Goldstein; Fangzi Liao; Mary Kay Gill; Heather Hower; Thomas W Frazier; Rasim S Diler; Eric A Youngstrom; Mary A Fristad; L Eugene Arnold; Robert L Findling; Sarah M Horwitz; Robert A Kowatch; Neal D Ryan; Michael Strober; Boris Birmaher; Martin B Keller Journal: Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2015-10-05 Impact factor: 4.785
Authors: Elizabeth T C Lippard; Carolyn M Mazure; Jennifer A Y Johnston; Linda Spencer; Judah Weathers; Brian Pittman; Fei Wang; Hilary P Blumberg Journal: J Neurosci Res Date: 2017-01-02 Impact factor: 4.164
Authors: Woo-Young Ahn; Olga Rass; Daniel J Fridberg; Anthony J Bishara; Jennifer K Forsyth; Alan Breier; Jerome R Busemeyer; William P Hetrick; Amanda R Bolbecker; Brian F O'Donnell Journal: J Abnorm Psychol Date: 2011-08-29
Authors: D M Cannon; J K Klaver; S K Gandhi; G Solorio; S A Peck; K Erickson; N Akula; J Savitz; W C Eckelman; M L Furey; B J Sahakian; F J McMahon; W C Drevets Journal: Mol Psychiatry Date: 2010-03-30 Impact factor: 15.992
Authors: Ezra Wegbreit; Grace K Cushman; Alexandra B Weissman; Erin Bojanek; Kerri L Kim; Ellen Leibenluft; Daniel P Dickstein Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2016-05-26 Impact factor: 4.839