Literature DB >> 19266557

Comparison of membrane assisted solvent extraction, stir bar sorptive extraction, and solid phase microextraction in analysis of tetramine in food.

Lowri S De Jager1, Gracia A Perfetti, Gregory W Diachenko.   

Abstract

Three environmentally friendly extraction techniques, membrane assisted solvent extraction (MASE), stir bar sorptive extraction (SBSE), and headspace solid phase microextraction (HS-SPME), were compared for the direct analysis of the highly toxic rodenticide tetramine in food. The optimized MASE method was applied to seven foods fortified with tetramine and compared to previously reported SBSE and HS-SPME results. Parameters such as the standard addition linearity (MASE (0.964-0.999), SBSE (0.966-0.999), HS-SPME (0.955-0.999)), recovery (MASE (12-86%), SBSE (36-130%), HS-SPME (50-200%)), reproducibility (MASE (3.0-30%), SBSE (4.4-9.6%), HS-SPME (1-12%)), and LOD (MASE (1.6-6.4 ng/g), SBSE (0.2-2.1 ng/g), HS-SPME (0.9-4.3 ng/g)) were compared.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19266557     DOI: 10.1002/jssc.200800576

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sep Sci        ISSN: 1615-9306            Impact factor:   3.645


  3 in total

1.  Differential antagonism of tetramethylenedisulfotetramine-induced seizures by agents acting at NMDA and GABA(A) receptors.

Authors:  Michael P Shakarjian; Jana Velíšková; Patric K Stanton; Libor Velíšek
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 4.219

2.  Sensitive Immunoassay for Detection and Quantification of the Neurotoxin, Tetramethylenedisulfotetramine.

Authors:  Natalia Vasylieva; Bogdan Barnych; Amy Rand; Bora Inceoglu; Shirley J Gee; Bruce D Hammock
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 6.986

Review 3.  Green Approaches to Sample Preparation Based on Extraction Techniques.

Authors:  Alshymaa A Aly; Tadeusz Górecki
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 4.411

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.