Irene A Doherty1, Victor J Schoenbach, Adaora A Adimora. 1. Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7030, USA. doherty@med.unc.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Concurrent partnerships accelerate dissemination of STIs. Most investigations of the features of concurrent partnerships have focused on higher risk subpopulations. GOAL: To assess condom use and the duration of concurrent sexual partnerships among men in the United States. STUDY DESIGN: Analysis of concurrent sexual partnerships among men in the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth. We classified pairs of concurrent partnerships into 3 types: transitional, contained, and experimental concurrency, and assessed the duration of overlap. We also report the distribution of condom use at the last sexual intercourse with neither, one or both concurrent partners of each pair and characteristics of men more likely to have used condoms with neither sex partner. RESULTS: The duration of overlap was <1 month in 32%, 1 to 3 months in 19%, and >12 months in 25% of concurrency pairs. Half (55%) of the pairs (whites, 64%; blacks, 41%) involved unprotected sex at the last sexual intercourse with at least 1 partner. The 35% of men who were more likely to use condoms with neither sex partner at the last sexual intercourse were older, white (48%), married/cohabitating (55%), and during the previous 12 months were incarcerated (49%), or used crack/cocaine (51%). CONCLUSIONS: Although blacks generally experience higher rates of STIs and HIV, in this representative sample of men in the United States, blacks in concurrent partnerships seemed to use the only available protection (condoms) against infection (apart from abstinence) more than other racial/ethnic groups. Continued investigation of features of sexual partnership patterns is critical for curbing STI and HIV transmission.
OBJECTIVES: Concurrent partnerships accelerate dissemination of STIs. Most investigations of the features of concurrent partnerships have focused on higher risk subpopulations. GOAL: To assess condom use and the duration of concurrent sexual partnerships among men in the United States. STUDY DESIGN: Analysis of concurrent sexual partnerships among men in the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth. We classified pairs of concurrent partnerships into 3 types: transitional, contained, and experimental concurrency, and assessed the duration of overlap. We also report the distribution of condom use at the last sexual intercourse with neither, one or both concurrent partners of each pair and characteristics of men more likely to have used condoms with neither sex partner. RESULTS: The duration of overlap was <1 month in 32%, 1 to 3 months in 19%, and >12 months in 25% of concurrency pairs. Half (55%) of the pairs (whites, 64%; blacks, 41%) involved unprotected sex at the last sexual intercourse with at least 1 partner. The 35% of men who were more likely to use condoms with neither sex partner at the last sexual intercourse were older, white (48%), married/cohabitating (55%), and during the previous 12 months were incarcerated (49%), or used crack/cocaine (51%). CONCLUSIONS: Although blacks generally experience higher rates of STIs and HIV, in this representative sample of men in the United States, blacks in concurrent partnerships seemed to use the only available protection (condoms) against infection (apart from abstinence) more than other racial/ethnic groups. Continued investigation of features of sexual partnership patterns is critical for curbing STI and HIV transmission.
Authors: Olga A Grinstead; Bonnie Faigeles; Megan Comfort; David Seal; Jill Nealey-Moore; Lisa Belcher; Kathleen Morrow Journal: Women Health Date: 2005
Authors: Irene A Doherty; Stephen Shiboski; Jonathan M Ellen; Adaora A Adimora; Nancy S Padian Journal: Sex Transm Dis Date: 2006-06 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: James M Lepkowski; William D Mosher; Karen E Davis; Robert M Groves; John van Hoewyk; Jennifer Willem Journal: Vital Health Stat 2 Date: 2006-07
Authors: Carolyn Tucker Halpern; Denise Hallfors; Daniel J Bauer; Bonita Iritani; Martha W Waller; Hyunsan Cho Journal: Perspect Sex Reprod Health Date: 2004 Nov-Dec
Authors: Adaora A Adimora; Victor J Schoenbach; Francis E A Martinson; Tamera Coyne-Beasley; Irene Doherty; Tonya R Stancil; Robert E Fullilove Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2006-04-15 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Suzanne L Wenzel; Harmony Rhoades; Hsun-Ta Hsu; Daniela Golinelli; Joan S Tucker; David P Kennedy; Harold D Green; Brett Ewing Journal: AIDS Behav Date: 2012-10
Authors: Eboni M Taylor; Frieda M Behets; Victor J Schoenbach; William C Miller; Irene A Doherty; Adaora A Adimora Journal: Sex Transm Dis Date: 2011-04 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Victoria Frye; Kim Williams; Keosha T Bond; Kirk Henny; Malik Cupid; Linda Weiss; Debbie Lucy; Beryl A Koblin Journal: J Urban Health Date: 2013-10 Impact factor: 3.671
Authors: Adaora A Adimora; James P Hughes; Jing Wang; Danielle F Haley; Carol E Golin; Manya Magnus; Anne Rompalo; Jessica Justman; Carlos del Rio; Wafaa El-Sadr; Sharon Mannheimer; Lydia Soto-Torres; Sally L Hodder Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2014-01-01 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Jocelyn T Warren; S Marie Harvey; Isaac Joel Washburn; Diana Maria Sanchez; Victor J Schoenbach; Christopher R Agnew Journal: Sex Transm Dis Date: 2015-04 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Eli S Rosenberg; Richard B Rothenberg; David G Kleinbaum; Rob B Stephenson; Patrick S Sullivan Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2013-08-01 Impact factor: 3.731