Literature DB >> 19264964

Plant root growth and the marginal value theorem.

Gordon G McNickle1, James F Cahill.   

Abstract

All organisms must find and consume resources to live, and the strategies an organism uses when foraging can have significant impacts on their fitness. Models assuming optimality in foraging behavior, and which quantitatively account for the costs, benefits, and biological constraints of foraging, are common in the animal literature. Plant ecologists on the other hand have rarely adopted an explicit framework of optimality with respect to plant root foraging. Here, we show with a simple experiment that the marginal value theorem (MVT), one of the most classic models of animal foraging behavior, can provide novel insights into the root foraging behavior of plants. We also discuss existing data in the literature, which has not usually been linked to MVT to provide further support for the benefits of an optimal foraging framework for plants. As predicted by MVT, plants invest more time and effort into highly enriched patches than they do to low-enriched patches. On the basis of this congruency, and the recent calls for new directions in the plant foraging literature, we suggest plant ecologists should work toward a more explicit treatment of the idea of optimality in studies of plant root foraging. Such an approach is advantageous because it forces a quantitative treatment of the assumptions being made and the constraints on the system. While we believe significant insight can be gained from the use of preexisting models of animal foraging, ultimately plant ecologists will have to develop taxa-specific models that account for the unique biology of plants.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19264964      PMCID: PMC2660770          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0807971106

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  12 in total

1.  Resource choice in Cuscuta europaea.

Authors:  C K Kelly
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-12-15       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Root foraging for patchy resources in eight herbaceous plant species.

Authors:  Tara K Rajaniemi; Heather L Reynolds
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2004-07-20       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Plant phenotypic plasticity belowground: a phylogenetic perspective on root foraging trade-offs.

Authors:  Steven W Kembel; James F Cahill
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2005-05-26       Impact factor: 3.926

4.  Root foraging theory put to the test.

Authors:  Hans de Kroon; Liesje Mommer
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2005-12-19       Impact factor: 17.712

5.  The scale-precision trade-off in spacial resource foraging by plants: restoring perspective.

Authors:  J P Grime
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2007-03-20       Impact factor: 4.357

6.  Optimal foraging by bacteriophages through host avoidance.

Authors:  Richard H Heineman; Rachael Springman; James J Bull
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.926

7.  Optimal foraging, the marginal value theorem.

Authors:  E L Charnov
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  1976-04       Impact factor: 1.570

8.  Improving the scale and precision of hypotheses to explain root foraging ability.

Authors:  Steven W Kembel; Hans De Kroon; James F Cahill; Liesje Mommer
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2008-04-19       Impact factor: 4.357

9.  The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: a critique of the adaptationist programme.

Authors:  S J Gould; R C Lewontin
Journal:  Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1979-09-21

10.  Root foraging traits and competitive ability in heterogeneous soils.

Authors:  Tara K Rajaniemi
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2007-04-20       Impact factor: 3.298

View more
  14 in total

1.  Context dependence in foraging behaviour of Achillea millefolium.

Authors:  Justine D Karst; Pamela R Belter; Jonathan A Bennett; James F Cahill
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 2.  The foundations of plant intelligence.

Authors:  Anthony Trewavas
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 3.906

3.  Effects of neighbour location and nutrient distributions on root foraging behaviour of the common sunflower.

Authors:  Megan K Ljubotina; James F Cahill
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Neuronal basis of sequential foraging decisions in a patchy environment.

Authors:  Benjamin Y Hayden; John M Pearson; Michael L Platt
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2011-06-05       Impact factor: 24.884

5.  Learning the opportunity cost of time in a patch-foraging task.

Authors:  Sara M Constantino; Nathaniel D Daw
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 3.282

6.  How past and present influence the foraging of clonal plants?

Authors:  Philipe Louâpre; Anne-Kristel Bittebière; Bernard Clément; Jean-Sébastien Pierre; Cendrine Mony
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Root foraging influences plant growth responses to earthworm foraging.

Authors:  Erin K Cameron; James F Cahill; Erin M Bayne
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Root foraging increases performance of the clonal plant Potentilla reptans in heterogeneous nutrient environments.

Authors:  Zhengwen Wang; Mark van Kleunen; Heinjo J During; Marinus J A Werger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Root resource foraging: does it matter?

Authors:  Xin Tian; Peter Doerner
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2013-08-12       Impact factor: 5.753

10.  Soil particle heterogeneity affects the growth of a rhizomatous wetland plant.

Authors:  Lin Huang; Bi-Cheng Dong; Wei Xue; Yi-Ke Peng; Ming-Xiang Zhang; Fei-Hai Yu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-30       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.