Literature DB >> 19264367

Radial artery graft flowmetry is better than saphenous vein on postero-lateral wall.

Giuseppe Santarpino1, Francesco Onorati, Lucia Cristodoro, Cristian Scalas, Pasquale Mastroroberto, Attilio Renzulli.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although general agreement exists on internal mammary graft as the first conduit, the second choice is still questioned. Despite radial artery (RA) grafting has been suggested, saphenous veins (SV) continue to be extensively used.
METHODS: A prospective series of isolated RA-CABG (150 patients) or SV-CABG (180 patients), performed either off-pump (OP-CABG) and on-pump (CPB-CABG), in diabetics and non-diabetics, in elderly and young patients, during the last 5-years at a single institution were evaluated. RA was harvested with harmonic scalpel, flowmetry was performed with a transit-time flowmeter (TTF). Graft flow reserve (GFR) was calculated with intra-aortic balloon-pump. Follow-up was collected by outpatient clinic database or by telephone interview with general practitioners.
RESULTS: The 2 groups showed comparable preoperative and intraoperative variables. Mortality, morbidity, myocardial infarction, troponin I leakage, and echocardiographic parameters were comparable (p=NS). RA-CABG demonstrated significantly higher TTF maximum, mean and minimum flow (p<.001) with lower Pulsatility Index (p<.001), either in the circumflex and the right coronaries. Compared to SVG-grafting, significantly higher GFR was found in RA-CABG on the circumflex (p=.001) and right (p=.028) coronaries. 38.1+/-0.9 SE months follow-up resulted in higher survival and freedom from cardiac events in RA-CABG. Better TTF and GFR were demonstrated in OP-CABG, CPB-CABG, diabetics, non-diabetics, either on the circumflex and right coronary systems (p<.05). Better mean flow was detected in RA-CABG on the circumflex in the elderly (p=.04) and the young (p=.05).
CONCLUSIONS: RA-CABG demonstrated better TTF and GFR results compared to SV-CABG. These data may contribute to explain the survival benefit of arterial revascularization already reported. Copyright (c) 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19264367     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2009.02.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiol        ISSN: 0167-5273            Impact factor:   4.164


  2 in total

1.  Radial Artery Versus Right Internal Thoracic Artery Versus Saphenous Vein as the Second Conduit for Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: A Network Meta-Analysis of Clinical Outcomes.

Authors:  Mario Gaudino; Roberto Lorusso; Mohamed Rahouma; Ahmed Abouarab; Derrick Y Tam; Cristiano Spadaccio; Gaëlle Saint-Hilary; Jeremy Leonard; Mario Iannaccone; Fabrizio D'Ascenzo; Antonino Di Franco; Giovanni Soletti; Mohamed K Kamel; Christopher Lau; Leonard N Girardi; Thomas A Schwann; Umberto Benedetto; David P Taggart; Stephen E Fremes
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2019-01-22       Impact factor: 5.501

2.  Transit time flow measurement of coronary bypass grafts before and after protamine administration.

Authors:  Dror B Leviner; Miriam von Mücke Similon; Carlo Maria Rosati; Andrea Amabile; Daniel J F M Thuijs; Gabriele Di Giammarco; Daniel Wendt; Gregory D Trachiotis; Teresa M Kieser; A Pieter Kappetein; Stuart J Head; David P Taggart; John D Puskas
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2021-07-09       Impact factor: 1.637

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.