Literature DB >> 19264239

Abbreviated infusion of eptifibatide after successful coronary intervention The BRIEF-PCI (Brief Infusion of Eptifibatide Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention) randomized trial.

Anthony Y Fung1, Jacqueline Saw, Andrew Starovoytov, Cameron Densem, Percy Jokhi, Simon J Walsh, Rebecca S Fox, Karin H Humphries, Eve Aymong, Donald R Ricci, John G Webb, Jaap N Hamburger, Ronald G Carere, Christopher E Buller.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to assess whether the early discontinuation of eptifibatide infusion in nonemergent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is associated with a higher frequency of periprocedural ischemic myonecrosis.
BACKGROUND: The recommended regimen for eptifibatide is a double bolus followed by an infusion for 18 h. It is not known whether the infusion can be shortened if the PCI is uncomplicated.
METHODS: We enrolled 624 patients with stable angina, acute coronary syndrome, or recent ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (>48 h) who underwent successful coronary stenting and received eptifibatide. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either an 18-h infusion or an abbreviated infusion of <2 h. The primary end point was the incidence of periprocedural myonecrosis defined as troponin-I elevation >0.26 microg/l. Secondary end points included death, myocardial infarction, urgent target vessel revascularization at 30 days, and in-hospital major bleeding using the REPLACE-2 (Randomized Evaluation in PCI Linking Angiomax to Reduced Clinical Events) trial criteria.
RESULTS: The incidence of periprocedural myonecrosis was 30.1% in the <2-h group versus 28.3% in the 18-h group (mean difference: 1.8%; upper bound of 95% confidence interval: 7.8%; p < 0.012 for noninferiority). The 30-day incidence of myocardial infarction, death, and target vessel revascularization was similar in both groups (p = NS). Major bleeding was less frequent in the <2-h group (1.0% vs. 4.2%, p = 0.02).
CONCLUSIONS: After uncomplicated PCI, eptifibatide infusion can be abbreviated safely to <2 h. It is not inferior to the standard 18-h infusion in preventing ischemic outcome, and it may be associated with less major bleeding. (Brief Infusion of Eptifibatide Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention [BRIEF PCI]; NCT00111566).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19264239     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.09.060

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  12 in total

Review 1.  Optimal use of platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antagonists in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions.

Authors:  H Benjamin Starnes; Ankit A Patel; George A Stouffer
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2011-10-22       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  Glycoprotein IIb-IIIa inhibitors - do we still need them?

Authors:  Vijayakumar Subban; K Sarat Chandra
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2013-04-25

3.  Duration of eptifibatide infusion after percutaneous coronary intervention and outcomes among high-risk patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome: insights from EARLY ACS.

Authors:  Connie N Hess; Phillip J Schulte; L Kristin Newby; Philippe Gabriel Steg; Anthony J Dalby; Marc J Schweiger; Basil S Lewis; Paul W Armstrong; Robert M Califf; Frans van de Werf; Robert A Harrington
Journal:  Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care       Date:  2013-09

4.  Bleeding avoidance strategies. Consensus and controversy.

Authors:  Harold L Dauerman; Sunil V Rao; Frederic S Resnic; Robert J Applegate
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2011-06-28       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Review of Currently Available GP IIb/IIIa Inhibitors and Their Role in Peripheral Vascular Interventions.

Authors:  P Anondo Stangl; Sara Lewis
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 1.513

Review 6.  Clinical and economic studies of eptifibatide in coronary stenting.

Authors:  Tilak Pasala; Prasongchai Sattayaprasert; Pradeep K Bhat; Ganesh Athappan; Sanjay Gandhi
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2014-08-02       Impact factor: 2.423

7.  Heparin Versus Bivalirudin in Acute Myocardial Infarction: Unfractionated Heparin Monotherapy Elevated to Primary Treatment in Contemporary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Authors:  Osmar Antonio Centurión
Journal:  Open Cardiovasc Med J       Date:  2016-06-30

8.  Ticagrelor and Eptifibatide Bolus Versus Ticagrelor and Eptifibatide Bolus With 2-Hour Infusion in High-Risk Acute Coronary Syndromes Patients Undergoing Early Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Authors:  Moazez J Marian; Oluseun Alli; Firas Al Solaiman; Brigitta C Brott; Mark Sasse; Tara Leesar; Sumanth D Prabhu; Massoud A Leesar
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 5.501

Review 9.  Selecting the optimal antithrombotic regimen for patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Shailja V Parikh; Ellen C Keeley
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2009-08-20

10.  Eptifibatide Bolus Dose During Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Authors:  Hossein Doustkami; Saeed Sadeghieh Ahari; Effat Irani Jam; Afshin Habibzadeh
Journal:  Cardiol Res       Date:  2018-04-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.