Literature DB >> 19263412

Tradeoffs and sexual conflict over women's fertility preferences in Mpimbwe.

Monique Borgerhoff Mulder1.   

Abstract

There are two principle evolutionary models for why women reduce their fertility, which can be used to explain the modern demographic transition. The first derives from optimality theory (specifically the "quantity-quality" tradeoff hypothesis), and the second from models of biased cultural transmission ("prestige bias" and "kin influence" hypotheses). Data on family planning preferences collected in 1996 and 1998 in a rural African village (in Mpimbwe, Tanzania) are used to test predictions derived from each hypothesis and show that both "quantity-quality" tradeoffs and biased cultural transmission underlie Pimbwe women's decisions. Reproductive decisions, however, are not made in a vacuum. Men and women's ideal family sizes often differ, and sexual conflict is particularly likely to affect a woman's success in limiting her family size. Pimbwe women's reproductive output between the initial family planning survey in 1996 and the most recent demographic survey (2006) is analyzed in relation to both the woman's preferences to limit her family and her exposure to husbands and husbands' kin. Despite wide differences in desired family sizes between men and women the extent of sexual conflict in this population is restricted to husbands and wives, and affects not a woman's use or planned use of modern contraception but her success in employing such methods effectively. There is also some evidence that a woman's mother and her kin assist in the use and effective use of modern methods, offering a prevailing force to the high-fertility objectives of the husband. 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19263412     DOI: 10.1002/ajhb.20885

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hum Biol        ISSN: 1042-0533            Impact factor:   1.937


  11 in total

1.  Conditional grandmother effects on age at marriage, age at first birth, and completed fertility of daughters and daughters-in-law in historical Krummhörn.

Authors:  Johannes Johow; Eckart Voland
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2012-09

2.  Understanding the nature of wealth and its effects on human fitness.

Authors:  Monique Borgerhoff Mulder; Bret A Beheim
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-02-12       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Why do women have more children than they want? Understanding differences in women's ideal and actual family size in a natural fertility population.

Authors:  Lisa McAllister; Michael Gurven; Hillard Kaplan; Jonathan Stieglitz
Journal:  Am J Hum Biol       Date:  2012-09-17       Impact factor: 1.937

4.  Does Sexual Conflict between Mother and Father Lead to Fertility Decline? : A Questionnaire Survey in a Modern Developed Society.

Authors:  Masahito Morita; Hisashi Ohtsuki; Mariko Hiraiwa-Hasegawa
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2016-06

5.  What do men want? Re-examining whether men benefit from higher fertility than is optimal for women.

Authors:  Cristina Moya; Kristin Snopkowski; Rebecca Sear
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Social transmission and the spread of modern contraception in rural Ethiopia.

Authors:  Alexandra Alvergne; Eshetu Gurmu; Mhairi A Gibson; Ruth Mace
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-07-22       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Serial monogamy as polygyny or polyandry? : marriage in the tanzanian pimbwe.

Authors:  Monique Borgerhoff Mulder
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2009-06

8.  When the mother-in-law is just as good-Differential mortality of reproductive females by family network composition.

Authors:  Kai Pierre Willführ; Johannes Johow; Eckart Voland
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  The offspring quantity-quality trade-off and human fertility variation.

Authors:  David W Lawson; Monique Borgerhoff Mulder
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 10.  The cultural evolution of fertility decline.

Authors:  Heidi Colleran
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 6.237

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.