Literature DB >> 19263013

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation and the 2005 universal algorithm: has the quality of CPR improved?

Bernhard Roessler1, Roman Fleischhackl, Heidrun Losert, Cosima Wandaller, Jasmin Arrich, Martina Mittlboeck, Hans Domanovits, Kaus Hoerauf.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Chest compressions are crucial in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), although the optimal number, rate and sequence are unknown. The 2005 CPR guidelines of the European Resuscitation Council (ERC) brought major changes to the basic life support algorithm. One of the major aims of the ERC was to decrease hands-off time in order to improve perfusion of the coronary vessels and the brain. Using a manikin model of basic life support in simulated cardiac arrest, we compared hands-off time and total number of chest compressions according to the guidelines of 2000 and those of 2005.
METHODS: A total of 50 volunteers performed CPR according to the guidelines of 2000 (Group 2000) and 2005 (Group 2005) in a randomized unblinded cross-over study. Volunteers received 10 min of standardized teaching and 10 min of training, including corrective feedback, for each set of guidelines before performing 5 min of basic life support on a manikin. We compared hands-off time as the primary outcome parameter and the total number of chest compressions as the secondary outcome parameter.
RESULTS: Fifty volunteers were enrolled in the study, one individual dropped out after randomization. In Group 2005, hands-off time was significantly lower (mean 107 +/- 19 [SD] s vs. 139 +/- 15 s in Group 2000 (P < 0.0001) and the total number of chest compressions was significantly higher (347 +/- 64 compressions vs. 233 +/- 51 compressions; P < 0.0001).
CONCLUSION: In this manikin setting, both hands-off time and the total number of chest compressions improved with basic life support performed according to the ERC guidelines of 2005.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19263013     DOI: 10.1007/s00508-008-1105-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr        ISSN: 0043-5325            Impact factor:   1.704


  14 in total

1.  European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2000 for Adult Basic Life Support. A statement from the Basic Life Support and Automated External Defibrillation Working Group(1) and approved by the Executive Committee of the European Resuscitation Council.

Authors:  A J Handley; K G Monsieurs; L L Bossaert
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 5.262

2.  Optimum compression to ventilation ratios in CPR under realistic, practical conditions: a physiological and mathematical analysis.

Authors:  Charles F Babbs; Karl B Kern
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 5.262

Review 3.  European Resuscitation Council guidelines for resuscitation 2005. Section 2. Adult basic life support and use of automated external defibrillators.

Authors:  Anthony J Handley; Rudolph Koster; Koen Monsieurs; Gavin D Perkins; Sian Davies; Leo Bossaert
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 5.262

4.  Rescuer fatigue: standard versus continuous chest-compression cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Authors:  Joseph W Heidenreich; Robert A Berg; Travis A Higdon; Gordon A Ewy; Karl B Kern; Arthur B Sanders
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.451

5.  The effect on quality of chest compressions and exhaustion of a compression--ventilation ratio of 30:2 versus 15:2 during cardiopulmonary resuscitation--a randomised trial.

Authors:  Koen Deschilder; Rien De Vos; Willem Stockman
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2007-03-23       Impact factor: 5.262

6.  Minimizing stomach inflation versus optimizing chest compressions.

Authors:  Holger Herff; Peter Paal; Achim von Goedecke; Thomas Mitterlechner; Thomas Danninger; Volker Wenzel
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 5.108

7.  Epidemiology and outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Rochester, New York.

Authors:  Rollin J Fairbanks; Manish N Shah; E Brooke Lerner; Kumar Ilangovan; Elliot C Pennington; Sandra M Schneider
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2006-12-14       Impact factor: 5.262

Review 8.  Improving cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality to ensure survival.

Authors:  Petter Andreas Steen; Jo Kramer-Johansen
Journal:  Curr Opin Crit Care       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.687

9.  Practical impact of the European Resuscitation Council's BLS algorithm 2005.

Authors:  B Roessler; R Fleischhackl; H Losert; C Wandaller; J Arrich; M Mittlboeck; H Domanovits; K Hoerauf
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2007-02-14       Impact factor: 5.262

10.  Quality of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation influences outcome after prehospital cardiac arrest.

Authors:  L Wik; P A Steen; N G Bircher
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 5.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.