BACKGROUND: With the rising number of dementia patients with associated costs and the recognition that there is room for improvement in the provision of dementia care, the question arises on how to efficiently provide high quality dementia care. OBJECTIVE: To describe the design of a study to determine multidisciplinary memory clinics' (MMC) effectiveness and cost-effectiveness in post-diagnosis treatment and care-coordination of dementia patients and their caregivers compared to the post-diagnosis treatment and care-coordination by general practitioners (GP). Next, this article provides the theoretical background of pragmatic trials, often needed in complex interventions, with the AD- Euro study as an example of such a pragmatic approach in a clinical trial. METHOD: The study is a pragmatic multicentre, randomised clinical trial with an economic evaluation alongside, which aims to recruit 220 independently living patients with a new dementia diagnosis and their informal caregivers. After baseline measurements, patient and caregiver are allocated to the treatment arm MMC or GP and are visited for follow up measurements at 6 and 12 months. Primary outcome measures are Health Related Quality of Life of the patient as rated by the caregiver using the Quality of Life in Alzheimer's Disease instrument (Qol-AD) and self-perceived caregiving burden of the informal caregiver measured using the Sense of Competence Questionnaire (SCQ). To establish cost-effectiveness a cost-utility analysis using utilities generated by the EuroQol instrument (EQ-5D) will be conducted from a societal perspective. Analyses will be done in an intention-to-treat fashion. RESULTS: The inclusion period started in January 2008 and will commence until at least December 2008. After finalising follow up the results of the study are expected to be available halfway through 2010. DISCUSSION: The study will provide an answer to whether follow-up of dementia patients can best be done in specialised outpatient memory clinics or in primary care settings with regard to quality and costs. It will enable decision making on how to provide good and efficient health care services in dementia. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT00554047.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: With the rising number of dementiapatients with associated costs and the recognition that there is room for improvement in the provision of dementia care, the question arises on how to efficiently provide high quality dementia care. OBJECTIVE: To describe the design of a study to determine multidisciplinary memory clinics' (MMC) effectiveness and cost-effectiveness in post-diagnosis treatment and care-coordination of dementiapatients and their caregivers compared to the post-diagnosis treatment and care-coordination by general practitioners (GP). Next, this article provides the theoretical background of pragmatic trials, often needed in complex interventions, with the AD- Euro study as an example of such a pragmatic approach in a clinical trial. METHOD: The study is a pragmatic multicentre, randomised clinical trial with an economic evaluation alongside, which aims to recruit 220 independently living patients with a new dementia diagnosis and their informal caregivers. After baseline measurements, patient and caregiver are allocated to the treatment arm MMC or GP and are visited for follow up measurements at 6 and 12 months. Primary outcome measures are Health Related Quality of Life of the patient as rated by the caregiver using the Quality of Life in Alzheimer's Disease instrument (Qol-AD) and self-perceived caregiving burden of the informal caregiver measured using the Sense of Competence Questionnaire (SCQ). To establish cost-effectiveness a cost-utility analysis using utilities generated by the EuroQol instrument (EQ-5D) will be conducted from a societal perspective. Analyses will be done in an intention-to-treat fashion. RESULTS: The inclusion period started in January 2008 and will commence until at least December 2008. After finalising follow up the results of the study are expected to be available halfway through 2010. DISCUSSION: The study will provide an answer to whether follow-up of dementiapatients can best be done in specialised outpatient memory clinics or in primary care settings with regard to quality and costs. It will enable decision making on how to provide good and efficient health care services in dementia. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT00554047.
Authors: A Greco; E Orlandi; A Mirabile; S Takanen; C Fallai; N A Iacovelli; A Rimedio; E Russi; M Sala; D Monzani; D I Rosenthal; G B Gunn; P Steca; L Licitra; P Bossi Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2015-03-21 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: H Villars; S Oustric; S Andrieu; J P Baeyens; R Bernabei; H Brodaty; K Brummel-Smith; C Celafu; N Chappell; J Fitten; G Frisoni; L Froelich; O Guerin; G Gold; I Holmerova; S Iliffe; A Lukas; R Melis; J E Morley; H Nies; F Nourhashemi; J Petermans; J Ribera Casado; L Rubenstein; A Salva; C Sieber; A Sinclair; R Schindler; E Stephan; R Y Wong; B Vellas Journal: J Nutr Health Aging Date: 2010-02 Impact factor: 4.075
Authors: Adam Smith; Brian Giunta; Paula C Bickford; Michael Fountain; Jun Tan; R Douglas Shytle Journal: Int J Pharm Date: 2010-01-18 Impact factor: 5.875
Authors: Augusta P Silveira; Joaquim Gonçalves; Teresa Sequeira; Cláudia Ribeiro; Carlos Lopes; Eurico Monteiro; Francisco L Pimentel Journal: Head Neck Oncol Date: 2010-10-31