Literature DB >> 19262232

Compensatory or inappropriate left ventricular mass in different models of left ventricular pressure overload: comparison between patients with aortic stenosis and arterial hypertension.

Gian Francesco Mureddu1, Giovanni Cioffi, Carlo Stefenelli, Alessandro Boccanelli, Giovanni de Simone.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Aortic valve stenosis and arterial hypertension (AH) are two models of left ventricular (LV) pressure overload, which commonly induce increase in LV mass. Prevalence and predictors of excess of LV mass (inappropriate LVM) has been recently investigated in AH patients. Whether or not this phenomenon also exists in patients with aortic valve stenosis has to be defined.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate prevalence of and factors associated with inappropriate LVM as a response to overload in aortic valve stenosis compared to AH patients. DESIGN AND METHODS: One hundred patients with aortic valve stenosis (mean valve area 0.67 +/- 0.18 cm/m) were studied by Doppler echocardiography and compared to 200 patients with AH. Inappropriate LVM was diagnosed when the measured LV mass exceeded by 28% the expected value predicted from height, sex and stroke work.
RESULTS: Prevalence of inappropriate LVM was similar in aortic valve stenosis (n: 24 = 24%) and AH patients (n: 55 = 27.5%). Aortic valve stenosis had greater LVM (203 +/- 57 vs. 182 +/- 53 g, P = 0.001), more concentric LV geometry, lower midwall shortening and higher left atrial systolic force than AH. In both study groups, high LV mass, concentric LV geometry and reduced systolic function emerged as independent correlates of inappropriate LV mass.
CONCLUSION: Although LV and left atrial geometric adaptation in aortic valve stenosis is different from AH, reflecting a near-pure pressure overload, aortic valve stenosis patients have a prevalence of inappropriately high LVM which is similar to those with AH. Geometric and functional characteristics of inappropriate LVM do not differ in aortic valve stenosis and AH, despite the different loading conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19262232     DOI: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e32831cec98

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hypertens        ISSN: 0263-6352            Impact factor:   4.844


  4 in total

1.  Coexisting cardiac diseases and pressure recovery phenomenon contribute to discrepancy between the echocardiographic severity of aortic stenosis and left ventricular hypertrophy.

Authors:  Ayumu Abe; Taisei Mikami; Sanae Kaga; Kanako Tsuji; Kazunori Okada; Shinobu Yokoyama; Hisao Nishino; Masahiro Nakabachi; Mutsumi Nishida; Chikara Shimizu; Hiroyuki Iwano; Satoshi Yamada; Hiroyuki Tsutsui
Journal:  J Echocardiogr       Date:  2013-01-09

2.  In vivo key role of reactive oxygen species and NHE-1 activation in determining excessive cardiac hypertrophy.

Authors:  Oscar H Cingolani; Néstor G Pérez; Irene L Ennis; María C Alvarez; Susana M Mosca; Guillermo R Schinella; Eduardo M Escudero; Gloria Cónsole; Horacio E Cingolani
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  2011-08-26       Impact factor: 3.657

3.  Circulating level of miR-378 predicts left ventricular hypertrophy in patients with aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Zhongxiu Chen; Chen Li; Yuanning Xu; Yajiao Li; Hao Yang; Li Rao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-26       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Better Myocardial Function in Aortic Stenosis with Low Left Ventricular Mass: A Mechanism of Protection against Heart Failure Regardless of Stenosis Severity?

Authors:  Bernadeta Chyrchel; Klaudiusz Bolt; Dorota Długosz; Anna Urbańska; Małgorzata Nowak-Kępczyk; Joanna Bałata; Agnieszka Rożanowska; Ewa Czestkowska; Olga Kruszelnicka; Andrzej Surdacki
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 4.241

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.