Literature DB >> 19261576

A quick visual mind can be a slow auditory mind. Individual differences in attentional selection across modalities.

Sander Martens1, Addie Johnson, Martje Bolle, Jelmer Borst.   

Abstract

The human mind is severely limited in processing concurrent information at a conscious level of awareness. These temporal restrictions are clearly reflected in the attentional blink (AB), a deficit in reporting the second of two targets when it occurs 200-500 ms after the first. However, we recently reported that some individuals do not show a visual AB, and presented psychophysiological evidence that target processing differs between "blinkers" and "nonblinkers". Here, we present evidence that visual nonblinkers do show an auditory AB, which suggests that a major source of attentional restriction as reflected in the AB is likely to be modality-specific. In Experiment 3, we show that when the difficulty in identifying visual targets is increased, nonblinkers continue to show little or no visual AB, suggesting that the presence of an AB in the auditory but not in the visual modality is not due to a difference in task difficulty.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19261576     DOI: 10.1027/1618-3169.56.1.33

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Psychol        ISSN: 1618-3169


  11 in total

1.  Working memory capacity, intelligence, and the magnitude of the attentional blink revisited.

Authors:  Sander Martens; Addie Johnson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-09-02       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 2.  The attentional blink: past, present, and future of a blind spot in perceptual awareness.

Authors:  Sander Martens; Brad Wyble
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 8.989

3.  A quick mind with letters can be a slow mind with natural scenes: individual differences in attentional selection.

Authors:  Sander Martens; Mathijs Dun; Brad Wyble; Mary C Potter
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  How does information processing speed relate to the attentional blink?

Authors:  Troy A W Visser; Jeneva L Ohan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-26       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Quick minds slowed down: effects of rotation and stimulus category on the attentional blink.

Authors:  Sander Martens; Ozlem Korucuoglu; Henderikus G O M Smid; Mark R Nieuwenstein
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-10-21       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Restricted attentional capacity within but not between sensory modalities: an individual differences approach.

Authors:  Sander Martens; Manasa Kandula; John Duncan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-12-07       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Musical minds: attentional blink reveals modality-specific restrictions.

Authors:  Sander Martens; Stefan M Wierda; Mathijs Dun; Michal de Vries; Henderikus G O M Smid
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Individual differences in the attentional blink: the temporal profile of blinkers and non-blinkers.

Authors:  Charlotte Willems; Stefan M Wierda; Eva van Viegen; Sander Martens
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-03       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Individual Differences in Temporal Selective Attention as Reflected in Pupil Dilation.

Authors:  Charlotte Willems; Johannes Herdzin; Sander Martens
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Time to see the bigger picture: Individual differences in the attentional blink.

Authors:  Charlotte Willems; Sander Martens
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.