OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to develop a quantitative measure of alcohol consumption for gene-mapping studies. METHOD: Using a sample of 3,787 young-adult twin women and an independent sample of 489 men and women from a college drinking study, we developed an alcohol-consumption factor score indexed by (1) maximum typical consumption (log-transformed quantity frequency [LQNTFRQ]), (2) maximum drinks in a 24-hours period (LMAXALC), (3) frequency of drinking five or more drinks per day (FIVE), and (4) frequency of drinking to intoxication (INTOX). We tested (1) for factorial and psychometric equivalence across samples and genders; (2) for construct validity and its equivalence, across samples and genders, using measures of tobacco and cannabis use and family history of alcoholism; and (3) to determine the heritability of the alcohol-consumption factor score using a genetic psychometric model. RESULTS: A single-factor model fit well with factor loadings ranging from .60 to .90. With rare exception, we found support for measurement invariance across the two samples and across genders. Measures of nicotine and cannabis use as well as family history of alcoholism were associated, to a similar extent across samples and genders, with the underlying alcohol-consumption factor. Psychometric twin modeling revealed that each of the alcohol-consumption measures (h2=34%-47%) and the underlying factor score (h2=50%) were heritable, with the remainder of the variance attributable to individual-specific environmental factors. This moderately heritable alcohol-consumption factor also accounted for a majority of the genetic variance in LQNTFRQ, LMAXALC, FIVE, and INTOX. CONCLUSIONS: Quantitative measures of alcohol consumption with the favorable attributes of measurement invariance, construct validity, and moderate heritability can greatly enhance future gene-mapping efforts, supplementing information afforded by conventional diagnostic measures of alcohol abuse/dependence.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to develop a quantitative measure of alcohol consumption for gene-mapping studies. METHOD: Using a sample of 3,787 young-adult twin women and an independent sample of 489 men and women from a college drinking study, we developed an alcohol-consumption factor score indexed by (1) maximum typical consumption (log-transformed quantity frequency [LQNTFRQ]), (2) maximum drinks in a 24-hours period (LMAXALC), (3) frequency of drinking five or more drinks per day (FIVE), and (4) frequency of drinking to intoxication (INTOX). We tested (1) for factorial and psychometric equivalence across samples and genders; (2) for construct validity and its equivalence, across samples and genders, using measures of tobacco and cannabis use and family history of alcoholism; and (3) to determine the heritability of the alcohol-consumption factor score using a genetic psychometric model. RESULTS: A single-factor model fit well with factor loadings ranging from .60 to .90. With rare exception, we found support for measurement invariance across the two samples and across genders. Measures of nicotine and cannabis use as well as family history of alcoholism were associated, to a similar extent across samples and genders, with the underlying alcohol-consumption factor. Psychometric twin modeling revealed that each of the alcohol-consumption measures (h2=34%-47%) and the underlying factor score (h2=50%) were heritable, with the remainder of the variance attributable to individual-specific environmental factors. This moderately heritable alcohol-consumption factor also accounted for a majority of the genetic variance in LQNTFRQ, LMAXALC, FIVE, and INTOX. CONCLUSIONS: Quantitative measures of alcohol consumption with the favorable attributes of measurement invariance, construct validity, and moderate heritability can greatly enhance future gene-mapping efforts, supplementing information afforded by conventional diagnostic measures of alcohol abuse/dependence.
Authors: T Reich; H J Edenberg; A Goate; J T Williams; J P Rice; P Van Eerdewegh; T Foroud; V Hesselbrock; M A Schuckit; K Bucholz; B Porjesz; T K Li; P M Conneally; J I Nurnberger; J A Tischfield; R R Crowe; C R Cloninger; W Wu; S Shears; K Carr; C Crose; C Willig; H Begleiter Journal: Am J Med Genet Date: 1998-05-08
Authors: A C Heath; K K Bucholz; P A Madden; S H Dinwiddie; W S Slutske; L J Bierut; D J Statham; M P Dunne; J B Whitfield; N G Martin Journal: Psychol Med Date: 1997-11 Impact factor: 7.723
Authors: K K Bucholz; A C Heath; T Reich; V M Hesselbrock; J R Kramer; J I Nurnberger; M A Schuckit Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 1996-11 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Arpana Agrawal; Neal D Freedman; Yu-Ching Cheng; Peng Lin; John R Shaffer; Qi Sun; Kira Taylor; Brian Yaspan; John W Cole; Marilyn C Cornelis; Rebecca S DeSensi; Annette Fitzpatrick; Gerardo Heiss; Jae H Kang; Jeffrey O'Connell; Siiri Bennett; Ebony Bookman; Kathleen K Bucholz; Neil Caporaso; Richard Crout; Danielle M Dick; Howard J Edenberg; Alison Goate; Victor Hesselbrock; Steven Kittner; John Kramer; John I Nurnberger; Lu Qi; John P Rice; Marc Schuckit; Rob M van Dam; Eric Boerwinkle; Frank Hu; Steven Levy; Mary Marazita; Braxton D Mitchell; Louis R Pasquale; Laura J Bierut Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2012-02-01 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Robert F Leeman; Markus Heilig; Christopher L Cunningham; David N Stephens; Theodora Duka; Stephanie S O'Malley Journal: Addict Biol Date: 2010-04 Impact factor: 4.280
Authors: Ke Xu; Henry R Kranzler; Richard Sherva; Carolyn E Sartor; Laura Almasy; Ryan Koesterer; Hongyu Zhao; Lindsay A Farrer; Joel Gelernter Journal: Alcohol Clin Exp Res Date: 2015-06-03 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Ajna Hamidovic; Robert J Goodloe; Taylor R Young; Mindi A Styn; Kenneth J Mukamal; Helene Choquet; Jay L Kasberger; Sarah G Buxbaum; George J Papanicolaou; Wendy White; Kelly Volcik; Bonnie Spring; Brian Hitsman; Daniel Levy; Eric Jorgenson Journal: J Clin Psychopharmacol Date: 2013-04 Impact factor: 3.153
Authors: Julia D Grant; Arpana Agrawal; Kathleen K Bucholz; Pamela A F Madden; Michele L Pergadia; Elliot C Nelson; Michael T Lynskey; Richard D Todd; Alexandre A Todorov; Narelle K Hansell; John B Whitfield; Nicholas G Martin; Andrew C Heath Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2009-07-03 Impact factor: 13.382