Literature DB >> 19260838

Mycophenolate mofetil monotherapy for severe side effects of calcineurin inhibitors following liver transplantation.

S Dharancy1, A Iannelli, A Hulin, N Declerck, A S Schneck, P Mathurin, E Boleslawski, J Gugenheim, F R Pruvot.   

Abstract

Withdrawal of calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) followed by mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) monotherapy after liver transplantation (LT) remains controversial due to the increased risk of acute rejection and graft loss. The aim of the present study, performed in a large cohort of liver-transplanted patients with severe CNI-induced side effects, was to assess renal function recovery, and safety in terms of liver function, of complete CNI withdrawal and replacement by MMF monotherapy. Fifty-two patients treated with MMF monotherapy for CNI-induced toxicity were analyzed. Mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) increased significantly during the period of MMF monotherapy, from 37 +/- 10 to 44.7 +/- 15 mL/min/1.73 m(2) at 6 months (p = 0.001) corresponding to a benefit of +17.4% in renal function. eGFR stabilized or improved in 86.5%, 81% and 79% of cases, and chronic renal dysfunction worsened in 13.5%, 19% and 21% of cases, at 6, 12 and 24 months after CNI withdrawal, respectively. Only two patients experienced acute rejection. MMF monotherapy may be efficient at reversing/stabilizing CRD, and appears relatively safe in terms of liver graft function in long-term liver-transplanted patients. However, clinicians must bear in mind the potential risk of rejection and graft loss, and should be very cautious in the management of such 'difficult-to-treat patients'.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19260838     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2008.02529.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Transplant        ISSN: 1600-6135            Impact factor:   8.086


  8 in total

1.  Hepatobiliary quiz-7 (2013).

Authors:  Swastik Agrawal; Radha K Dhiman
Journal:  J Clin Exp Hepatol       Date:  2013-09

Review 2.  Overview of immunosuppression in liver transplantation.

Authors:  Anjana A Pillai; Josh Levitsky
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-09-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  Current status of immunosuppression in liver transplantation.

Authors:  Narendra S Choudhary; Sanjiv Saigal; Rajat Shukla; Hardik Kotecha; Neeraj Saraf; Arvinder S Soin
Journal:  J Clin Exp Hepatol       Date:  2013-06-03

Review 4.  Management of immunosuppressant agents following liver transplantation: Less is more.

Authors:  Mustafa S Ascha; Mona L Ascha; Ibrahim A Hanouneh
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2016-01-28

5.  Calcineurin-inhibitor minimization in liver transplant patients with calcineurin-inhibitor-related renal dysfunction: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yuan Kong; Dongping Wang; Yushu Shang; Wenhua Liang; Xiaoting Ling; Zhiyong Guo; Xiaoshun He
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-09-09       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Cyclosporine: a review.

Authors:  Dustin Tedesco; Lukas Haragsim
Journal:  J Transplant       Date:  2012-01-04

7.  Efficacy and safety of a reduced calcineurin inhibitor dose combined with mycophenolate mofetil in liver transplant patients with chronic renal dysfunction.

Authors:  Pusen Wang; Weitao Que; Hao Li; Lvnan Yan; Zhiren Fu; Qifa Ye; Guihua Chen; Kefeng Dou; Shichun Lu; Zhanyu Yang; Zhijun Zhu; Zhihai Peng; Lin Zhong
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-02-18

8.  Renal damage after liver transplantation.

Authors:  Thorsten Feldkamp; Anja Bienholz; Andreas Paul; Fuat H Saner
Journal:  Biosci Rep       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 3.840

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.