Literature DB >> 1925976

Bias in congenital malformations information from the birth certificate.

A C Hexter1, J A Harris.   

Abstract

An analysis of 1983 data from California birth certificates, and from the California Birth Defects Monitoring Program case registry, showed that there is a bias in reporting of congenital malformations on the birth certificate. Hospitals with many births erroneously report lower malformation rates than do hospitals with few births. The bias is partly due to the source of information; larger hospitals are more likely to get their information about malformations from the obstetrician than from the pediatrician. Since malformation data recorded on the birth certificate is both incomplete and biased, at present it is advisable to use these data for epidemiologic analyses with great caution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1925976     DOI: 10.1002/tera.1420440205

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Teratology        ISSN: 0040-3709


  8 in total

1.  Identifying Algorithms to Improve the Accuracy of Unverified Diagnosis Codes for Birth Defects.

Authors:  Jason L Salemi; Rachel E Rutkowski; Jean Paul Tanner; Jennifer L Matas; Russell S Kirby
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 2.792

2.  A quality assessment of reporting sources for microcephaly in Utah, 2003 to 2013.

Authors:  Amy Steele; Jane Johnson; Amy Nance; Robert Satterfield; C J Alverson; Cara Mai
Journal:  Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol       Date:  2016-11

3.  Sensitivity of birth certificate reports of birth defects in Atlanta, 1995-2005: effects of maternal, infant, and hospital characteristics.

Authors:  Sheree L Boulet; Mikyong Shin; Russell S Kirby; David Goodman; Adolfo Correa
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2011 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.792

4.  Maternal and infant characteristics associated with prone and lateral infant sleep positioning in Washington state, 1996-2002.

Authors:  Christy M McKinney; Victoria L Holt; Michael L Cunningham; Brian G Leroux; Jacqueline R Starr
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2008-03-28       Impact factor: 4.406

Review 5.  Neural tube defects in Latin America and the impact of fortification: a literature review.

Authors:  Jorge Rosenthal; Jessica Casas; Douglas Taren; Clinton J Alverson; Alina Flores; Jaime Frias
Journal:  Public Health Nutr       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 4.022

6.  Inclusion of non-viable neonates in the birth record and its impact on infant mortality rates in Shelby County, Tennessee, USA.

Authors:  Bryan L Williams; Melina S Magsumbol
Journal:  Pediatr Rep       Date:  2010-06-18

7.  Understanding the relative contributions of prematurity and congenital anomalies to neonatal mortality.

Authors:  Ciaran S Phibbs; Molly Passarella; Susan K Schmitt; Jeannette A Rogowski; Scott A Lorch
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2022-01-16       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Birth malformations and other adverse perinatal outcomes in four U.S. Wheat-producing states.

Authors:  Dina M Schreinemachers
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 9.031

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.