Literature DB >> 19259490

Manipulation of rhizosphere bacterial communities to induce suppressive soils.

Mark Mazzola1.   

Abstract

Naturally occurring disease-suppressive soils have been documented in a variety of cropping systems, and in many instances the biological attributes contributing to suppressiveness have been identified. While these studies have often yielded an understanding of operative mechanisms leading to the suppressive state, significant difficulty has been realized in the transfer of this knowledge into achieving effective field-level disease control. Early efforts focused on the inundative application of individual or mixtures of microbial strains recovered from these systems and known to function in specific soil suppressiveness. However, the introduction of biological agents into non-native soil ecosystems typically yielded inconsistent levels of disease control. Of late, greater emphasis has been placed on manipulation of the cropping system to manage resident beneficial rhizosphere microorganisms as a means to suppress soilborne plant pathogens. One such strategy is the cropping of specific plant species or genotypes or the application of soil amendments with the goal of selectively enhancing disease-suppressive rhizobacteria communities. This approach has been utilized in a system attempting to employ biological elements resident to orchard ecosystems as a means to control the biologically complex phenomenon termed apple replant disease. Cropping of wheat in apple orchard soils prior to re-planting the site to apple provided control of the fungal pathogen Rhizoctonia solani AG-5. Disease control was elicited in a wheat cultivar-specific manner and functioned through transformation of the fluorescent pseudomonad population colonizing the rhizosphere of apple. Wheat cultivars that induced disease suppression enhanced populations of specific fluorescent pseudomonad genotypes with antagonistic activity toward R. solani AG-5, but cultivars that did not elicit a disease-suppressive soil did not modify the antagonistic capacity of this bacterial community. Alternatively, brassicaceae seed meal amendments were utilized to develop soil suppressiveness toward R. solani. Suppression of Rhizoctonia root rot in response to seed meal amendment required the activity of the resident soil microbiota and was associated with elevated populations of Streptomyces spp. recovered from the apple rhizosphere. Application of individual Streptomyces spp. to soil systems provided control of R. solani to a level and in a manner equivalent to that obtained with the seed meal amendment. These and other examples suggest that management of resident plant-beneficial rhizobacteria may be a viable method for control of specific soilborne plant pathogens.

Entities:  

Year:  2007        PMID: 19259490      PMCID: PMC2586500     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nematol        ISSN: 0022-300X            Impact factor:   1.402


  18 in total

1.  BIOCONTROL WITHIN THE CONTEXT OF SOIL MICROBIAL COMMUNITIES: A Substrate-Dependent Phenomenon.

Authors:  HAJ Hoitink; MJ Boehm
Journal:  Annu Rev Phytopathol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 13.078

Review 2.  Microbial populations responsible for specific soil suppressiveness to plant pathogens.

Authors:  David M Weller; Jos M Raaijmakers; Brian B McSpadden Gardener; Linda S Thomashow
Journal:  Annu Rev Phytopathol       Date:  2002-05-13       Impact factor: 13.078

3.  Making greater use of introduced microorganisms for biological control of plant pathogens.

Authors:  R J Cook
Journal:  Annu Rev Phytopathol       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 13.078

4.  Elucidation of the microbial complex having a causal role in the development of apple replant disease in washington.

Authors:  M Mazzola
Journal:  Phytopathology       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 4.025

5.  Impact of wheat cultivation on microbial communities from replant soils and apple growth in greenhouse trials.

Authors:  M Mazzola; Y H Gu
Journal:  Phytopathology       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 4.025

6.  In vitro and in vivo antagonism of pathogenic turfgrass fungi by Streptomyces hygroscopicus strains YCED9 and WYE53.

Authors:  K Chamberlain; D L Crawford
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 3.346

7.  Wheat cultivar-specific selection of 2,4-diacetylphloroglucinol-producing fluorescent Pseudomonas species from resident soil populations.

Authors:  M Mazzola; D L Funnell; J M Raaijmakers
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2004-08-24       Impact factor: 4.552

8.  Wheat Genotype-Specific Induction of Soil Microbial Communities Suppressive to Disease Incited by Rhizoctonia solani Anastomosis Group (AG)-5 and AG-8.

Authors:  Mark Mazzola; Yu-Huan Gu
Journal:  Phytopathology       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.025

9.  Frequency, Diversity, and Activity of 2,4-Diacetylphloroglucinol-Producing Fluorescent Pseudomonas spp. in Dutch Take-all Decline Soils.

Authors:  Jorge T de Souza; David M Weller; Jos M Raaijmakers
Journal:  Phytopathology       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 4.025

10.  Biological Suppression and Natural Population Decline of Heterodera schachtii in a California Field.

Authors:  A Westphal; J O Becker
Journal:  Phytopathology       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.025

View more
  11 in total

1.  Fungal invasion of the rhizosphere microbiome.

Authors:  Emilie Chapelle; Rodrigo Mendes; Peter A H M Bakker; Jos M Raaijmakers
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2015-05-29       Impact factor: 10.302

2.  Conserving and enhancing biological control of nematodes.

Authors:  Patricia Timper
Journal:  J Nematol       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 1.402

3.  Myxococcus xanthus induces actinorhodin overproduction and aerial mycelium formation by Streptomyces coelicolor.

Authors:  Juana Pérez; José Muñoz-Dorado; Alfredo F Braña; Lawrence J Shimkets; Laura Sevillano; Ramón I Santamaría
Journal:  Microb Biotechnol       Date:  2010-09-27       Impact factor: 5.813

4.  Microbial community analysis of apple rhizosphere around Bohai Gulf.

Authors:  Jihang Jiang; Zhen Song; Xiaotong Yang; Zhiquan Mao; Xiaohong Nie; Hui Guo; Xiawei Peng
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Comparative Microbiome Analysis of a Fusarium Wilt Suppressive Soil and a Fusarium Wilt Conducive Soil From the Châteaurenard Region.

Authors:  Katarzyna Siegel-Hertz; Véronique Edel-Hermann; Emilie Chapelle; Sébastien Terrat; Jos M Raaijmakers; Christian Steinberg
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-04-04       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 6.  Disease-Suppressive Soils-Beyond Food Production: a Critical Review.

Authors:  Somasundaram Jayaraman; A K Naorem; Rattan Lal; Ram C Dalal; N K Sinha; A K Patra; S K Chaudhari
Journal:  J Soil Sci Plant Nutr       Date:  2021-03-12

7.  Correlations between root-associated microorganisms and peach replant disease symptoms in a California soil.

Authors:  Jiue-in Yang; Paul M Ruegger; Michael V McKenry; J Ole Becker; James Borneman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-05       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Harnessing phytomicrobiome signaling for rhizosphere microbiome engineering.

Authors:  Liliana Quiza; Marc St-Arnaud; Etienne Yergeau
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 5.753

9.  Soil acidification amendments change the rhizosphere bacterial community of tobacco in a bacterial wilt affected field.

Authors:  Guihua Shen; Shuting Zhang; Xiaojiao Liu; Qipeng Jiang; Wei Ding
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2018-10-09       Impact factor: 4.813

10.  Bio-organic fertilizers stimulate indigenous soil Pseudomonas populations to enhance plant disease suppression.

Authors:  Chengyuan Tao; Rong Li; Wu Xiong; Zongzhuan Shen; Shanshan Liu; Beibei Wang; Yunze Ruan; Stefan Geisen; Qirong Shen; George A Kowalchuk
Journal:  Microbiome       Date:  2020-09-22       Impact factor: 14.650

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.