Literature DB >> 19259012

Radiographs interpretation by forensic pathologists: a word of warning.

Célia Kremer1, Stéphanie Racette, Dominique Marton, Anny Sauvageau.   

Abstract

In child deaths investigation, radiologic examination is particularly important in the diagnosis of child abuse. In the province of Quebec, Canada, all autopsies for suspicious deaths are performed at a centralized forensic laboratory where, because of budget restrictions, forensic pathologists rely on their own knowledge for radiographs interpretations. To assess the validity of this radiologic examination by nonradiologist forensic specialist, we reviewed all cases of child death on a 1-year period. A total of 20 cases were reviewed by an experienced pediatric radiologist, and this interpretation was compared with pathologist's conclusions. Forensic pathologists missed an important finding in 3 positive cases. Yet, none of those missed findings would have significantly changed the cases outcome, because other autopsy findings had already oriented the final diagnosis. Nevertheless, this result is alarming. In a general context of financing problems, it can be appealing to management team to restrict access to external consultants. This study is important in reminding that such money savings do not come without a decrease in quality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19259012     DOI: 10.1097/PAF.0b013e3181847db0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Forensic Med Pathol        ISSN: 0195-7910            Impact factor:   0.921


  2 in total

Review 1.  Educational paper: imaging child abuse: the bare bones.

Authors:  Rick Robert van Rijn; Tessa Sieswerda-Hoogendoorn
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 3.183

Review 2.  Current techniques in postmortem imaging with specific attention to paediatric applications.

Authors:  Tessa Sieswerda-Hoogendoorn; Rick R van Rijn
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2009-12-16
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.