Literature DB >> 19258883

Exercises for the torso performed in a standing posture: spine and hip motion and motor patterns and spine load.

Stuart M McGill1, Amy Karpowicz, Chad M J Fenwick, Stephen H M Brown.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to document the muscle activity, spine motion, spine load, and stiffness during several movement-based or "functional" exercises and to assess the effect of technique change. Eight subjects, all healthy men from a university population, were instrumented to obtain surface electromyography of selected trunk and hip muscles, together with video analysis and electromagnetic lumbar spine position sensor to track spine posture. Exercises included a walkout in the sagittal plane that compared an upright form against a wall with those performed on the floor, overhead cable pushes, lateral cable walkouts, the good morning exercise, and the bowler's squat. Generally, muscle activation levels were quite modest even though the tasks were quite strenuous in many cases. Even though similar joint moments were required in different exercises, the pattern of activity between muscles was different. Abdominal bracing increased spine stiffness at the expense of more spine load. Thus, muscle activity seems to be constrained in "functional" exercises. There are several possible reasons for this. Single muscles cannot be activated to 100% of the maximum voluntary contraction in functional exercises because this would upset the balance of moments about the 3 orthopedic axes of the spine, or it would upset the balance of stiffening muscles around the spine required to ensure stability of the spinal column. The one exception was the floor walkout, which resulted in full activation of the rectus abdominis; however, this was a sagittal plane task without the joint moment constraints of multiplanar exercise. Therefore, maximal muscle activity is observed during single-plane tasks, but muscle activation levels were constrained during functional tasks. Thus, strength training muscles may not help in "functional multiplanar" tasks. These data can be used to assist decisions regarding the selection of exercises, specifically choices regarding the starting challenge, progression, exercise form, and possibly corrective technique for those who have spine concerns, or those simply looking for performance enhancement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19258883     DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181a0227e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  3 in total

1.  Effects of load on good morning kinematics and EMG activity.

Authors:  Andrew David Vigotsky; Erin Nicole Harper; David Russell Ryan; Bret Contreras
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 2.984

2.  Clinical reasoning framework for thoracic spine exercise prescription in sport: a systematic review and narrative synthesis.

Authors:  Nicola R Heneghan; Svein M Lokhaug; Isaak Tyros; Sigurd Longvastøl; Alison Rushton
Journal:  BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med       Date:  2020-03-29

3.  Nonoperative treatment in lumbar spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis: a systematic review.

Authors:  Matthew Garet; Michael P Reiman; Jessie Mathers; Jonathan Sylvain
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 3.843

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.