Literature DB >> 19258604

Imageless computer navigation for placement of the femoral component in resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip.

M Olsen1, E T Davis, J P Waddell, E H Schemitsch.   

Abstract

We have investigated the accuracy of placement of the femoral component using imageless navigation in 100 consecutive Birmingham Hip Resurfacings. Pre-operative templating determined the native neck-shaft angle and planned stem-shaft angle of the implant. The latter were verified post-operatively using digital anteroposterior unilateral radiographs of the hip. The mean neck-shaft angle determined before operation was 132.7 degrees (118 degrees to 160 degrees ). The mean planned stem-shaft angle was a relative valgus alignment of 9.7 degrees (SD 2.6). The stem-shaft angle after operation differed from that planned by a mean of 2.8 degrees (SD 2.0) and in 86% of cases the final angle measured within +/- 5 degrees of that planned. We had no instances of notching of the neck or varus alignment of the implant in our series. A learning curve was observed in the time taken for navigation, but not for accurate placement of the implant. Navigation in hip resurfacing may afford the surgeon a reliable and accurate method of placement of the femoral component.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19258604     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.91B3.21288

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br        ISSN: 0301-620X


  8 in total

1.  A new system of computer-assisted navigation leading to reduction in operating time in uncemented total hip replacement in a matched population.

Authors:  Fouad A Chaudhry; Sanaa Z Ismail; Edward T Davis
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2018-01-29

2.  Avoiding short-term femoral neck fracture with imageless computer navigation for hip resurfacing.

Authors:  Michael Olsen; Emil H Schemitsch
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  A complication-based learning curve from 200 reverse shoulder arthroplasties.

Authors:  Laurence B Kempton; Elizabeth Ankerson; J Michael Wiater
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  CUSTOMIZED GUIDE FOR FEMORAL COMPONENT POSITIONING IN HIP RESURFACING ARTHROPLASTY.

Authors:  Chaturong Pornrattanamaneewong; Rapeepat Narkbunnam; Keerati Chareancholvanich
Journal:  Acta Ortop Bras       Date:  2017 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 0.513

5.  Effect of surgical experience on imageless computer-assisted femoral component positioning in hip resurfacing--a preclinical study.

Authors:  Maik Stiehler; Jens Goronzy; Stephan Kirschner; Albrecht Hartmann; Torsten Schäfer; Klaus-Peter Günther
Journal:  Eur J Med Res       Date:  2015-02-24       Impact factor: 2.175

6.  Long - term survivorship and clinical results of the navigated withdrawn ASR ™.

Authors:  Johannes H M van Ochten; Dariusch Arbab; Peer Eysel; Dietmar P König
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2018-08-16

Review 7.  Computer-assisted orthopaedic surgery and robotic surgery in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Nobuhiko Sugano
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2013-02-20

8.  Computer navigation experience in hip resurfacing improves femoral component alignment using a conventional jig.

Authors:  Zachary Morison; Akshay Mehra; Michael Olsen; Michael Donnelly; Emil Schemitsch
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 1.251

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.