C Reitz1, L Honig, J P Vonsattel, M-X Tang, R Mayeux. 1. Gertrude H Sergievsky Center/Taub Institute for Research on the Aging Brain, 630 West 168 Street, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA. cr2101@columbia.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the relation of amyloid and tau pathology in the hippocampal formation to decline in memory and other cognitive functions in Alzheimer's disease (AD). METHODS: Regression models were used to relate semiquantitative measurements of amyloid plaques, neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs) and neuropil threads (NTs) at autopsy with antemortem performance in memory, abstract/visuospatial and language domains in two independent samples (n = 41, n = 66) that had repeated neuropsychological measurements before death. RESULTS: In both groups, the number of NFTs in the entorhinal cortex, subiculum and CA1 region was inversely associated with memory performance at the last visit before death. However, the number of amyloid plaques and NTs in the entorhinal cortex was also inversely related to poor memory function. Moreover, as the number of plaques or NTs increased in any region of the hippocampal formation, there was a more rapid decline in memory performance over time; a similar decline was associated with increasing numbers of NFTs in the CA1 or subiculum. In contrast, there was no association between amyloid plaques, NFTs or NTs in the frontal or parietal lobe and performance in memory, nor was there an association between plaques, NFTs or NTs in the hippocampal formation and cognitive functions unrelated to memory. DISCUSSION: This study implicates both amyloid deposition and tau pathology in the hippocampus as an early and late cause of decline in memory function over time in AD. Memory performance appears to be specifically related to the amount of amyloid plaques, NFTs and NTs in the entorhinal cortex and hippocampus.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the relation of amyloid and tau pathology in the hippocampal formation to decline in memory and other cognitive functions in Alzheimer's disease (AD). METHODS: Regression models were used to relate semiquantitative measurements of amyloid plaques, neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs) and neuropil threads (NTs) at autopsy with antemortem performance in memory, abstract/visuospatial and language domains in two independent samples (n = 41, n = 66) that had repeated neuropsychological measurements before death. RESULTS: In both groups, the number of NFTs in the entorhinal cortex, subiculum and CA1 region was inversely associated with memory performance at the last visit before death. However, the number of amyloid plaques and NTs in the entorhinal cortex was also inversely related to poor memory function. Moreover, as the number of plaques or NTs increased in any region of the hippocampal formation, there was a more rapid decline in memory performance over time; a similar decline was associated with increasing numbers of NFTs in the CA1 or subiculum. In contrast, there was no association between amyloid plaques, NFTs or NTs in the frontal or parietal lobe and performance in memory, nor was there an association between plaques, NFTs or NTs in the hippocampal formation and cognitive functions unrelated to memory. DISCUSSION: This study implicates both amyloid deposition and tau pathology in the hippocampus as an early and late cause of decline in memory function over time in AD. Memory performance appears to be specifically related to the amount of amyloid plaques, NFTs and NTs in the entorhinal cortex and hippocampus.
Authors: Thomas W Mitchell; Elliott J Mufson; Julie A Schneider; Elizabeth J Cochran; Jonathan Nissanov; Li-Ying Han; Julia L Bienias; Virginia M -Y Lee; John Q Trojanowski; David A Bennett; Steven E Arnold Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2002-02 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: D A Bennett; R S Wilson; J A Schneider; D A Evans; N T Aggarwal; S E Arnold; E J Cochran; E Berry-Kravis; J L Bienias Journal: Neurology Date: 2003-01-28 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Tomas Ondrejcak; Igor Klyubin; Neng-Wei Hu; Andrew E Barry; William K Cullen; Michael J Rowan Journal: Neuromolecular Med Date: 2009-09-16 Impact factor: 3.843
Authors: Reisa A Sperling; Elizabeth C Mormino; Aaron P Schultz; Rebecca A Betensky; Kathryn V Papp; Rebecca E Amariglio; Bernard J Hanseeuw; Rachel Buckley; Jasmeer Chhatwal; Trey Hedden; Gad A Marshall; Yakeel T Quiroz; Nancy J Donovan; Jonathan Jackson; Jennifer R Gatchel; Jennifer S Rabin; Heidi Jacobs; Hyun-Sik Yang; Michael Properzi; Dylan R Kirn; Dorene M Rentz; Keith A Johnson Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2019-01-21 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Paul B Rosenberg; D F Wong; S L Edell; J S Ross; A D Joshi; J R Brašić; Y Zhou; V Raymont; A Kumar; H T Ravert; R F Dannals; M J Pontecorvo; D M Skovronsky; C G Lyketsos Journal: Am J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2013-03 Impact factor: 4.105
Authors: Enrico Mossello; Elena Ballini; Anna Maria Mello; Francesca Tarantini; David Simoni; Samuele Baldasseroni; Niccolò Marchionni Journal: Int J Alzheimers Dis Date: 2010-12-20
Authors: Vijay R Varma; H Büşra Lüleci; Anup M Oommen; Sudhir Varma; Chad T Blackshear; Michael E Griswold; Yang An; Jackson A Roberts; Richard O'Brien; Olga Pletnikova; Juan C Troncoso; David A Bennett; Tunahan Çakır; Cristina Legido-Quigley; Madhav Thambisetty Journal: NPJ Aging Mech Dis Date: 2021-06-01