Literature DB >> 19258021

Perceptual learning and roving: Stimulus types and overlapping neural populations.

Elisa M Tartaglia1, Kristoffer C Aberg, Michael H Herzog.   

Abstract

In perceptual learning, performance usually improves when observers train with one type of stimulus, for example, a bisection stimulus. Roving denotes the situation when, instead of one, two or more types of stimuli are presented randomly interleaved, for example, a bisection stimulus and a vernier. For some combinations of stimulus types, performance improves in roving situations whereas for others it does not. To investigate when roving impedes perceptual learning, we conducted four experiments. Performance improved, for example, when we roved a bisection stimulus and a vernier but not when we roved certain types of bisection stimuli. We propose that roving hinders perceptual learning when the stimulus types are clearly distinct from each other but still excite overlapping but not identical neural populations.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19258021     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2009.02.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  13 in total

1.  Deep Neural Networks for Modeling Visual Perceptual Learning.

Authors:  Li K Wenliang; Aaron R Seitz
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Learning one task by interleaving practice with another task.

Authors:  Sarit F A Szpiro; Beverly A Wright; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2014-06-21       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Tactile perceptual learning: learning curves and transfer to the contralateral finger.

Authors:  Amanda L Kaas; Vincent van de Ven; Joel Reithler; Rainer Goebel
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-11-18       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Interference and feature specificity in visual perceptual learning.

Authors:  Yuko Yotsumoto; Li-Hung Chang; Takeo Watanabe; Yuka Sasaki
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2009-08-06       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Simple contextual cueing prevents retroactive interference in short-term perceptual training of orientation detection tasks.

Authors:  Hui Huang; Yangming Zhang; Sheng Li
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Does perceptual learning suffer from retrograde interference?

Authors:  Kristoffer C Aberg; Michael H Herzog
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-12-07       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Retrograde interference in perceptual learning of a peripheral hyperacuity task.

Authors:  Shao-Chin Hung; Aaron R Seitz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-09-09       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Acquisition versus consolidation of auditory perceptual learning using mixed-training regimens.

Authors:  David W Maidment; HiJee Kang; Emma C Gill; Sygal Amitay
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Training improves visual processing speed and generalizes to untrained functions.

Authors:  Maria Lev; Karin Ludwig; Sharon Gilaie-Dotan; Stephanie Voss; Philipp Sterzer; Guido Hesselmann; Uri Polat
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2014-11-28       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  The effects of stimulus variability on the perceptual learning of speech and non-speech stimuli.

Authors:  Karen Banai; Sygal Amitay
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-25       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.