Literature DB >> 19255429

Epigenetic regulation of genetic integrity is reprogrammed during cloning.

Patricia Murphey1, Yukiko Yamazaki, C Alex McMahan, Christi A Walter, Ryuzo Yanagimachi, John R McCarrey.   

Abstract

Cloning by somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) circumvents processes that normally function during gametogenesis to prepare the gamete genomes to support development of new progeny following fertilization. One such process is enhanced maintenance of genetic integrity in germ cells, such that germ cells typically carry fewer spontaneously acquired mutations than somatic cells in the same individual. Thus, embryos produced from somatic cells by SCNT could directly inherit more mutations than naturally conceived embryos. Alternatively, they could inherit epigenetic programming that predisposes more rapid accumulation of de novo mutations during development. We used a transgenic mouse system to test these possibilities by producing cloned midgestation mouse fetuses from three different donor somatic cell types carrying significantly different initial frequencies of spontaneous mutations. We found that on an individual locus basis, mutations acquired spontaneously in a population of donor somatic cells are not likely to be propagated to cloned embryos by SCNT. In addition, we found that the rate of accumulation of spontaneous mutations was similar in fetuses produced by either natural conception or cloning, indicating that cloned fetuses do not acquire mutations more rapidly than naturally conceived fetuses. These results represent the first direct demonstration that the process of cloning by SCNT does not lead to an increase in the frequency of point mutations. These results also demonstrate that epigenetic mechanisms normally contribute to the regulation of genetic integrity in a tissue-specific manner, and that these mechanisms are subject to reprogramming during cloning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19255429      PMCID: PMC2660773          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0900687106

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  44 in total

1.  Mixed spermatogenic germ cell nuclear extracts exhibit high base excision repair activity.

Authors:  G W Intano; C A McMahan; R B Walter; J R McCarrey; C A Walter
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2001-03-15       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Assessment of the developmental totipotency of neural cells in the cerebral cortex of mouse embryo by nuclear transfer.

Authors:  Y Yamazaki; H Makino; K Hamaguchi-Hamada; S Hamada; H Sugino; E Kawase; T Miyata; M Ogawa; R Yanagimachi; T Yagi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-11-06       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Nuclear cloning and epigenetic reprogramming of the genome.

Authors:  W M Rideout ; K Eggan; R Jaenisch
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-08-10       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Cloning companion animals (horses, cats, and dogs).

Authors:  Mark Westhusin; Katrin Hinrichs; Young-Ho Choi; Taeyoung Shin; Ling Liu; Duane Kraemer
Journal:  Cloning Stem Cells       Date:  2003

Review 5.  Fertilization and development initiation in orthodox and unorthodox ways: from normal fertilization to cloning.

Authors:  Ryuzo Yanagimachi
Journal:  Adv Biophys       Date:  2003

Review 6.  Cloning: experience from the mouse and other animals.

Authors:  R Yanagimachi
Journal:  Mol Cell Endocrinol       Date:  2002-02-22       Impact factor: 4.102

7.  Mutational fingerprints of aging.

Authors:  Martijn E T Dollé; Wendy K Snyder; David B Dunson; Jan Vijg
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2002-01-15       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Disruption of imprinted gene methylation and expression in cloned preimplantation stage mouse embryos.

Authors:  Mellissa R W Mann; Young Gie Chung; Leisha D Nolen; Raluca I Verona; Keith E Latham; Marisa S Bartolomei
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2003-05-14       Impact factor: 4.285

9.  Spontaneous mutation in Big Blue mice from fetus to old age: tissue-specific time courses of mutation frequency but similar mutation types.

Authors:  Kathleen A Hill; Victoria L Buettner; Asanga Halangoda; Makoto Kunishige; Stephen R Moore; Jeffrey Longmate; William A Scaringe; Steve S Sommer
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.216

10.  Comparison of somatic mutation in a transgenic versus host locus.

Authors:  K S Tao; C Urlando; J A Heddle
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1993-11-15       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  4 in total

1.  Enhanced genetic integrity in mouse germ cells.

Authors:  Patricia Murphey; Derek J McLean; C Alex McMahan; Christi A Walter; John R McCarrey
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 4.285

2.  Dynamic Variations in Genetic Integrity Accompany Changes in Cell Fate.

Authors:  I-Chung Chen; Christine Hernandez; Xueping Xu; Austin Cooney; Yufeng Wang; John R McCarrey
Journal:  Stem Cells Dev       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 3.272

3.  Regenerant Arabidopsis lineages display a distinct genome-wide spectrum of mutations conferring variant phenotypes.

Authors:  Caifu Jiang; Aziz Mithani; Xiangchao Gan; Eric J Belfield; John P Klingler; Jian-Kang Zhu; Jiannis Ragoussis; Richard Mott; Nicholas P Harberd
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2011-07-28       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  Tertiary Epimutations - A Novel Aspect of Epigenetic Transgenerational Inheritance Promoting Genome Instability.

Authors:  John R McCarrey; Jake D Lehle; Seetha S Raju; Yufeng Wang; Eric E Nilsson; Michael K Skinner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-19       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.