PURPOSE: Increased physical activity in patients with colorectal cancer is related to improved recurrence-free and overall survival. Psychological distress after cancer may place patients at risk of reduced physical activity, but paradoxically may also act as a motivator for lifestyle change. The relationship between psychological distress and physical activity after cancer over time has not been described. METHODS: A prospective survey of 1,966 (57% response) colorectal cancer survivors assessed the psychological distress variables of anxiety, depression, somatization, and cancer threat appraisal as predictors of physical activity at 5, 12, 24, and 36 months postdiagnosis; 978 respondents had valid data for all time points. RESULTS: Higher somatization was associated with greater physical inactivity (relative risk ratio [RRR] = 1.12; 95% CI, 1.1 to 1.2) and insufficient physical activity (RRR = 1.05; 95% CI, 0.90 to 1.0). Respondents with a more positive appraisal of their cancer were significantly (P = .031) less likely to be inactive (RRR = 0.95; 95% CI, 0.90 to 1.0) or insufficiently active (RRR = 0.96). Fatigued and obese respondents and current smokers were more inactive. Respondents whose somatization increased between two time periods were less likely to increase their physical activity over the same period (P < .001). Respondents with higher anxiety at one time period were less likely to have increased their activity at the next assessment (P = .004). There was no association between depression and physical activity. CONCLUSION: Cancer survivors who experience somatization and anxiety are at greater risk of physical inactivity. The lack of a clear relationship between higher psychological distress and increasing physical activity argues against distress as a motivator to exercise in these patients.
PURPOSE: Increased physical activity in patients with colorectal cancer is related to improved recurrence-free and overall survival. Psychological distress after cancer may place patients at risk of reduced physical activity, but paradoxically may also act as a motivator for lifestyle change. The relationship between psychological distress and physical activity after cancer over time has not been described. METHODS: A prospective survey of 1,966 (57% response) colorectal cancer survivors assessed the psychological distress variables of anxiety, depression, somatization, and cancer threat appraisal as predictors of physical activity at 5, 12, 24, and 36 months postdiagnosis; 978 respondents had valid data for all time points. RESULTS: Higher somatization was associated with greater physical inactivity (relative risk ratio [RRR] = 1.12; 95% CI, 1.1 to 1.2) and insufficient physical activity (RRR = 1.05; 95% CI, 0.90 to 1.0). Respondents with a more positive appraisal of their cancer were significantly (P = .031) less likely to be inactive (RRR = 0.95; 95% CI, 0.90 to 1.0) or insufficiently active (RRR = 0.96). Fatigued and obese respondents and current smokers were more inactive. Respondents whose somatization increased between two time periods were less likely to increase their physical activity over the same period (P < .001). Respondents with higher anxiety at one time period were less likely to have increased their activity at the next assessment (P = .004). There was no association between depression and physical activity. CONCLUSION:Cancer survivors who experience somatization and anxiety are at greater risk of physical inactivity. The lack of a clear relationship between higher psychological distress and increasing physical activity argues against distress as a motivator to exercise in these patients.
Authors: S J Otto; I J Korfage; S Polinder; A van der Heide; E de Vries; J A C Rietjens; I Soerjomataram Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2014-10-16 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Suzanne K Chambers; Xingqiong Meng; Pip Youl; Joanne Aitken; Jeff Dunn; Peter Baade Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2011-12-27 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Kim L Dittus; Susan G Lakoski; Patrick D Savage; Nathan Kokinda; Michael Toth; Diane Stevens; Kimberly Woods; Patricia OʼBrien; Philip A Ades Journal: J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev Date: 2015 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 2.081
Authors: Claudia Trudel-Fitzgerald; Shelley S Tworoger; Elizabeth M Poole; Xuehong Zhang; Edward L Giovannucci; Jeffrey A Meyerhardt; Laura D Kubzansky Journal: Health Psychol Date: 2017-11-20 Impact factor: 4.267
Authors: Robert U Newton; Dennis R Taaffe; Nigel Spry; Robert A Gardiner; Gregory Levin; Bradley Wall; David Joseph; Suzanne K Chambers; Daniel A Galvão Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2009-06-29 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: Daniel A Galvão; Nigel Spry; Dennis R Taaffe; James Denham; David Joseph; David S Lamb; Greg Levin; Gillian Duchesne; Robert U Newton Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2009-12-02 Impact factor: 4.430