PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of high-dose stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for the treatment of patients with one to three lung metastases. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with one to three lung metastases with cumulative maximum tumor diameter smaller than 7 cm were enrolled and treated on a multi-institutional phase I/II clinical trial in which they received SBRT delivered in 3 fractions. In phase I, the total dose was safely escalated from 48 to 60 Gy. The phase II dose was 60 Gy. The primary end point was local control. Lesions with at least 6 months of radiographic follow-up were considered assessable for local control. Secondary end points included toxicity and survival. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients with 63 lesions were enrolled and treated at three participating institutions. Seventy-one percent had received at least one prior systemic regimen for metastatic disease and 34% had received at least two prior regimens (range, zero to five). Two patients had local recurrence after prior surgical resection. There was no grade 4 toxicity. The incidence of any grade 3 toxicity was 8% (three of 38). Symptomatic pneumonitis occurred in one patient (2.6%). Fifty lesions were assessable for local control. Median follow-up for assessable lesions was 15.4 months (range, 6 to 48 months). The median gross tumor volume was 4.2 mL (range, 0.2 to 52.3 mL). Actuarial local control at one and two years after SBRT was 100% and 96%, respectively. Local progression occurred in one patient, 13 months after SBRT. Median survival was 19 months. CONCLUSION: This multi-institutional phase I/II trial demonstrates that high-dose SBRT is safe and effective for the treatment of patients with one to three lung metastases.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of high-dose stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for the treatment of patients with one to three lung metastases. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with one to three lung metastases with cumulative maximum tumor diameter smaller than 7 cm were enrolled and treated on a multi-institutional phase I/II clinical trial in which they received SBRT delivered in 3 fractions. In phase I, the total dose was safely escalated from 48 to 60 Gy. The phase II dose was 60 Gy. The primary end point was local control. Lesions with at least 6 months of radiographic follow-up were considered assessable for local control. Secondary end points included toxicity and survival. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients with 63 lesions were enrolled and treated at three participating institutions. Seventy-one percent had received at least one prior systemic regimen for metastatic disease and 34% had received at least two prior regimens (range, zero to five). Two patients had local recurrence after prior surgical resection. There was no grade 4 toxicity. The incidence of any grade 3 toxicity was 8% (three of 38). Symptomatic pneumonitis occurred in one patient (2.6%). Fifty lesions were assessable for local control. Median follow-up for assessable lesions was 15.4 months (range, 6 to 48 months). The median gross tumor volume was 4.2 mL (range, 0.2 to 52.3 mL). Actuarial local control at one and two years after SBRT was 100% and 96%, respectively. Local progression occurred in one patient, 13 months after SBRT. Median survival was 19 months. CONCLUSION: This multi-institutional phase I/II trial demonstrates that high-dose SBRT is safe and effective for the treatment of patients with one to three lung metastases.
Authors: Deepinder Singh; Yuhchyau Chen; Mary Z Hare; Kenneth Y Usuki; Hong Zhang; Thomas Lundquist; Neil Joyce; Michael C Schell; Michael T Milano Journal: J Thorac Dis Date: 2014-04 Impact factor: 2.895
Authors: Steven N Seyedin; Jonathan E Schoenhals; Dean A Lee; Maria A Cortez; Xiaohong Wang; Sharareh Niknam; Chad Tang; David S Hong; Aung Naing; Padmanee Sharma; James P Allison; Joe Y Chang; Daniel R Gomez; John V Heymach; Ritsuko U Komaki; Laurence J Cooper; James W Welsh Journal: Immunotherapy Date: 2015-08-27 Impact factor: 4.196
Authors: Kamran A Ahmed; William J Fulp; Anders E Berglund; Sarah E Hoffe; Thomas J Dilling; Steven A Eschrich; Ravi Shridhar; Javier F Torres-Roca Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2015-03-30 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Sahra Bodo; Cécile Campagne; Tin Htwe Thin; Daniel S Higginson; H Alberto Vargas; Guoqiang Hua; John D Fuller; Ellen Ackerstaff; James Russell; Zhigang Zhang; Stefan Klingler; HyungJoon Cho; Matthew G Kaag; Yousef Mazaheri; Andreas Rimner; Katia Manova-Todorova; Boris Epel; Joan Zatcky; Cristian R Cleary; Shyam S Rao; Yoshiya Yamada; Michael J Zelefsky; Howard J Halpern; Jason A Koutcher; Carlos Cordon-Cardo; Carlo Greco; Adriana Haimovitz-Friedman; Evis Sala; Simon N Powell; Richard Kolesnick; Zvi Fuks Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2019-01-14 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Betul Berber; Rafael Ibarra; Laura Snyder; Min Yao; Jeffrey Fabien; Michael T Milano; Alan W Katz; Karyn Goodman; Kevin Stephans; Galal El-Gazzaz; Federico Aucejo; Charles Miller; John Fung; Simon Lo; Mitchell Machtay; Juan Sanabria Journal: HPB (Oxford) Date: 2013-01-14 Impact factor: 3.647