Literature DB >> 19255176

The efficacy of a repeated infiltration in prolonging duration of pulpal anesthesia in maxillary lateral incisors.

Jean Scott1, Melissa Drum, Al Reader, John Nusstein, Mike Beck.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown declining rates of pulpal anesthesia over 60-minute periods in patients who have received 1.8 milliliters of 2 percent lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine in the maxillary lateral incisor.
METHODS: The authors conducted a prospective, randomized, single-blind, crossover study comparing the degree of pulpal anesthesia obtained in 40 adult subjects with two sets of maxillary lateral incisor infiltrations, given in two separate appointments: an initial infiltration of 1.8 mL of 2 percent lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine plus a repeated infiltration of the same anesthetic and dose given 30 minutes after the initial infiltration, and an initial infiltration of 1.8 mL of 2 percent lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine plus a mock repeated infiltration given 30 minutes after the initial infiltration. The authors used an electric pulp tester to test the lateral incisor for anesthesia in two-minute cycles for 90 minutes after the injection.
RESULTS: The repeated infiltration improved pulpal anesthesia significantly in the maxillary lateral incisor in the period from 37 through 90 minutes postinjection. CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: A repeated infiltration of 1.8 mL of 2 percent lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine given 30 minutes after the initial infiltration significantly improved the duration of pulpal anesthesia in the maxillary lateral incisor.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19255176     DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.2009.0161

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc        ISSN: 0002-8177            Impact factor:   3.634


  7 in total

1.  A prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison of 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine, 4% prilocaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine, and 4% prilocaine for maxillary infiltrations.

Authors:  Steven Katz; Melissa Drum; Al Reader; John Nusstein; Mike Beck
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2010

2.  A prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison of 2% mepivacaine with 1 : 20,000 levonordefrin versus 2% lidocaine with 1 : 100,000 epinephrine for maxillary infiltrations.

Authors:  Ingrid Lawaty; Melissa Drum; Al Reader; John Nusstein
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2010

3.  The efficacy of a repeated buccal infiltration of articaine in prolonging duration of pulpal anesthesia in the mandibular first molar.

Authors:  Lindsay Pabst; John Nusstein; Melissa Drum; Al Reader; Mike Beck
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2009

4.  Pulpal Anesthesia of Adjacent Teeth Following Infiltration of 2% Lidocaine With 1:100,000 Epinephrine in the Maxillary Lateral Incisor and First Molar.

Authors:  Sara Fowler; Melissa Drum; Al Reader; John Nusstein; Mike Beck
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2019

5.  Anesthetic efficacy of a combination of 0.5 M mannitol plus 36.8 mg of lidocaine with 18.4 μg epinephrine in maxillary infiltration: a prospective, randomized, single-blind study.

Authors:  Kevin Younkin; Al Reader; Melissa Drum; John Nusstein; Mike Beck
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2014

Review 6.  Various strategies for pain-free root canal treatment.

Authors:  Masoud Parirokh; Paul V Abbott
Journal:  Iran Endod J       Date:  2013-12-24

7.  Does the presence and amount of epinephrine in 2% lidocaine affect its anesthetic efficacy in the management of symptomatic maxillary molars with irreversible pulpitis?

Authors:  Mamta Singla; Megha Gugnani; Mandeep S Grewal; Umesh Kumar; Vivek Aggarwal
Journal:  J Dent Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2022-01-24
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.