OBJECTIVES: Drawing from collective efficacy and social disorganization theories, we developed and validated measures of neighborhood-level social processes. METHODS: Data came from 2 large, population-based cohort studies of urban-dwelling older adults, the Chicago Neighborhood and Disability Study (CNDS, n = 3,882) and the Baltimore Memory Study (BMS, n = 1,140). Data on neighborhood social processes were collected from residents using a standardized instrument identical in the 2 studies. We used confirmatory factor analysis and descriptive statistics to explore reliability and validity of the neighborhood-level measures. RESULTS: Confirmatory factor analysis indicated 2 latent factors: social cohesion and exchange (i.e., observations of and interactions with neighbors) and social and physical disorder (i.e., neighborhood problems and unsafe conditions). Neighborhood-level measures of cohesion and disorder showed moderate to high levels of internal consistency (alphas = .78 and .85 in CNDS and .60 and .88 in BMS). Inter-resident agreements were low (intra-neighborhood correlation coefficients = .08 and .11 in CNDS and .05 and .33 in BMS). Cohesion showed a modest, positive association with a composite measure of neighborhood socioeconomic status (SES). Disorder showed a strong, negative association with neighborhood SES. CONCLUSIONS: Findings provide initial evidence of the reliability and construct validity of these neighborhood-level social process measures.
OBJECTIVES: Drawing from collective efficacy and social disorganization theories, we developed and validated measures of neighborhood-level social processes. METHODS: Data came from 2 large, population-based cohort studies of urban-dwelling older adults, the Chicago Neighborhood and Disability Study (CNDS, n = 3,882) and the Baltimore Memory Study (BMS, n = 1,140). Data on neighborhood social processes were collected from residents using a standardized instrument identical in the 2 studies. We used confirmatory factor analysis and descriptive statistics to explore reliability and validity of the neighborhood-level measures. RESULTS: Confirmatory factor analysis indicated 2 latent factors: social cohesion and exchange (i.e., observations of and interactions with neighbors) and social and physical disorder (i.e., neighborhood problems and unsafe conditions). Neighborhood-level measures of cohesion and disorder showed moderate to high levels of internal consistency (alphas = .78 and .85 in CNDS and .60 and .88 in BMS). Inter-resident agreements were low (intra-neighborhood correlation coefficients = .08 and .11 in CNDS and .05 and .33 in BMS). Cohesion showed a modest, positive association with a composite measure of neighborhood socioeconomic status (SES). Disorder showed a strong, negative association with neighborhood SES. CONCLUSIONS: Findings provide initial evidence of the reliability and construct validity of these neighborhood-level social process measures.
Authors: Karen A Kirtland; Dwayne E Porter; Cheryl L Addy; Matthew J Neet; Joel E Williams; Patricia A Sharpe; Linda J Neff; C Dexter Kimsey; Barbara E Ainsworth Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2003-05 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: A V Diez-Roux; F J Nieto; C Muntaner; H A Tyroler; G W Comstock; E Shahar; L S Cooper; R L Watson; M Szklo Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 1997-07-01 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Denis A Evans; David A Bennett; Robert S Wilson; Julia L Bienias; Martha Clare Morris; Paul A Scherr; Liesi E Hebert; Neelum Aggarwal; Laurel A Beckett; Rajiv Joglekar; Elizabeth Berry-Kravis; Julie Schneider Journal: Arch Neurol Date: 2003-02
Authors: Brian S Schwartz; Thomas A Glass; Karen I Bolla; Walter F Stewart; Gregory Glass; Meghan Rasmussen; Joseph Bressler; Weiping Shi; Karen Bandeen-Roche Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2004-03 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Cari Jo Clark; Hongfei Guo; Scott Lunos; Neelum T Aggarwal; Todd Beck; Denis A Evans; Carlos Mendes de Leon; Susan A Everson-Rose Journal: Stroke Date: 2011-04-14 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Alexandra D Crosswell; Madhuvanthi Suresh; Eli Puterman; Tara L Gruenewald; Jinkook Lee; Elissa S Epel Journal: J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci Date: 2020-04-16 Impact factor: 4.077
Authors: Pauline Karikari-Martin; Judith J McCann; Carol J Farran; Liesi E Hebert; Samuel C Haffer; Marcia Phillips Journal: Am J Hosp Palliat Care Date: 2015-03-09 Impact factor: 2.500
Authors: Hailey N Miller; Clifton P Thornton; Tamar Rodney; Roland J Thorpe; Jerilyn Allen Journal: ANS Adv Nurs Sci Date: 2020 Oct/Dec Impact factor: 1.824