Literature DB >> 19254824

Substituting energy crops with organic wastes and agro-industrial residues for biogas production.

Andrea Schievano1, Giuliana D'Imporzano, Fabrizio Adani.   

Abstract

In this study, industrial and agro-industrial by-products and residues (BRs), animal manures (AMs), and various types of organic wastes (OWs) were analyzed to evaluate their suitability as substitutes for energy crops (ECs) in biogas production. A comparison between the costs of the volume of biogas that can be produced from each substrate was presented with respect to the prices of the substrates in the Italian market. Furthermore, four different feeding mixtures were compared with a mixture of EC and swine manure (Mixture A) used in a full-scale plant in Italy. Swine manure is always included as a basic substrate in the feeding mixtures, because many of the Italian biogas plants are connected to farms. When EC were partially substituted with BR (Mixture B), the cost (0.28 euro Nm(-3)) of the volume of biogas of Mixture A dropped to 0.18 euro Nm(-3). Furthermore, when the organic fraction of municipal solid waste (OFMSW) and olive oil sludge (OS) were used as possible solutions (Mixtures C and D), the costs of the volume of biogas were -0.20 and 0.11euroNm(-3), respectively. The negative price signifies that operators earn money for treating the waste. For the fifth mix (Mixture E) of the OFMSW with a high solid substrate, such as glycerin from biodiesel production, the resulting cost of the volume of biogas produced was -0.09 euro Nm(-3). By comparing these figures, it is evident that the biogas plants at farm level are good candidates for treating organic residues of both municipalities and the agro-industrial sector in a cost-effective way, and in providing territorially diffused electric and thermal power. This may represent a potential development for agrarian economy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19254824     DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.01.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Manage        ISSN: 0301-4797            Impact factor:   6.789


  5 in total

1.  Microbial communities in anaerobic digesters change over time and sampling depth.

Authors:  Adriana Giongo; Camille E Granada; Luiz G A Borges; Leandro M Pereira; Fernanda J Trindade; Shaiana P Mattiello; Rafael R Oliveira; Fauzi M Shubeita; Adalberto Lovato; César Marcon; Renata Medina-Silva
Journal:  Braz J Microbiol       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 2.476

2.  The role of different methanogen groups evaluated by Real-Time qPCR as high-efficiency bioindicators of wet anaerobic co-digestion of organic waste.

Authors:  Deborah Traversi; Silvia Villa; Marco Acri; Biancamaria Pietrangeli; Raffaella Degan; Giorgio Gilli
Journal:  AMB Express       Date:  2011-10-07       Impact factor: 3.298

3.  Neural and hybrid modeling: an alternative route to efficiently predict the behavior of biotechnological processes aimed at biofuels obtainment.

Authors:  Stefano Curcio; Alessandra Saraceno; Vincenza Calabrò; Gabriele Iorio
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2014-01-05

4.  Engineering Escherichia coli K12 MG1655 to use starch.

Authors:  Luis Manuel Rosales-Colunga; Agustino Martínez-Antonio
Journal:  Microb Cell Fact       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 5.328

5.  Exploring tomato Solanum pennellii introgression lines for residual biomass and enzymatic digestibility traits.

Authors:  G Caruso; L D Gomez; F Ferriello; A Andolfi; C Borgonuovo; A Evidente; R Simister; S J McQueen-Mason; D Carputo; L Frusciante; M R Ercolano
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2016-04-05       Impact factor: 2.797

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.