Literature DB >> 19254819

Practice nurses and the effects of the new general practitioner contract in the English National Health Service: the extension of a professional project?

Ruth McDonald1, Stephen Campbell, Helen Lester.   

Abstract

This paper reports the impact on nurses working in primary health care settings of changes to the general practitioner (GP) contract in England implemented in 2004. Previous changes to the GP contract in 1990, which gave financial rewards for health promotion activities, were seen as enabling nurses to take on work that GPs did not want and providing an impetus for the development of a professional project (Broadbent, J. (1998). Practice nurses and the effects of the new general practitioner contract in the British NHS: the advent of a professional project? Social Science & Medicine, 47(4), 497-506). Our study, which involved interviews with nurses from 20 practices, finds that nurses are taking on work which has previously been the exclusive preserve of medical professionals. An increasing emphasis in nurses' accounts on technical skills and knowledge may help decouple nursing from a narrative of caring, which has been seen as detracting from professional advancement. Our research suggests that practice nurse work is changing to reflect a more medical (and masculine) orientation to service delivery. At the same time, nursing work is described as routine and template driven, which may limit claims to 'professional' status. The reaction of some practice nurses to Health Care Assistants encroaching on what was previously practice nurse territory suggests a policing of boundaries, rather than an inclusive approach to colleagues within the nursing team. This resonates with Davies' (Davies, C. (1995). Gender and the professional predicament in nursing. Bucks: Open University Press) suggestion that professionalisation as a process involves compliance with a masculine notion of professionalism (autonomous, elite, individual, divisive, detached) which marginalises feminine attributes and devalues the work done by women. The study also raises questions about the role of caring in general practice settings where nurses choose to prioritise other concerns.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19254819     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.01.039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  14 in total

1.  Delivering a national programme of anticipatory care in primary care: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Catherine A O'Donnell; Mhairi Mackenzie; Maggie Reid; Fiona Turner; Julia Clark; Yinging Wang; Sanjeev Sridharan; Stephen Platt
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Improving quality of primary care through financial incentives: the case of Thailand.

Authors:  Paramjit Gill; Rachel Foskett-Tharby; Francoise Cluzeau; Sripen Tantivess; Yot Teerawattananon
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Exception reporting in the Quality and Outcomes Framework: views of practice staff - a qualitative study.

Authors:  Stephen Campbell; Kerin Hannon; Helen Lester
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  Delivering the WISE (Whole Systems Informing Self-Management Engagement) training package in primary care: learning from formative evaluation.

Authors:  Anne Kennedy; Carolyn Chew-Graham; Thomas Blakeman; Andrew Bowen; Caroline Gardner; Joanne Protheroe; Anne Rogers; Linda Gask
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2010-01-29       Impact factor: 7.327

5.  Implementation of pay for performance in primary care: a qualitative study 8 years after introduction.

Authors:  Helen Lester; Tatum Matharu; Mohammed A Mohammed; David Lester; Rachel Foskett-Tharby
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 5.386

6.  Following the funding trail: financing, nurses and teamwork in Australian general practice.

Authors:  Christopher Pearce; Christine Phillips; Sally Hall; Bonnie Sibbald; Julie Porritt; Rachael Yates; Kathryn Dwan; Marjan Kljakovic
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-02-17       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  Implementation of self management support for long term conditions in routine primary care settings: cluster randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Anne Kennedy; Peter Bower; David Reeves; Tom Blakeman; Robert Bowen; Carolyn Chew-Graham; Martin Eden; Catherine Fullwood; Hannah Gaffney; Caroline Gardner; Victoria Lee; Rebecca Morris; Joanne Protheroe; Gerry Richardson; Caroline Sanders; Angela Swallow; David Thompson; Anne Rogers
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2013-05-13

8.  Collaborative Interventions for Circulation and Depression (COINCIDE): study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial of collaborative care for depression in people with diabetes and/or coronary heart disease.

Authors:  Peter A Coventry; Karina Lovell; Chris Dickens; Peter Bower; Carolyn Chew-Graham; Andrea Cherrington; Charlotte Garrett; Chris J Gibbons; Clare Baguley; Kate Roughley; Isabel Adeyemi; Chris Keyworth; Waquas Waheed; Mark Hann; Linda Davies; Farheen Jeeva; Chris Roberts; Sarah Knowles; Linda Gask
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2012-08-20       Impact factor: 2.279

9.  Integrated Primary Care Teams (IPCT) pilot project in Quebec: a protocol paper.

Authors:  Damien Contandriopoulos; Arnaud Duhoux; Bernard Roy; Maxime Amar; Jean-Pierre Bonin; Roxane Borges Da Silva; Isabelle Brault; Clémence Dallaire; Carl-Ardy Dubois; Francine Girard; Emmanuelle Jean; Caroline Larue; Lily Lessard; Luc Mathieu; Jacinthe Pépin; Mélanie Perroux; Aurore Cockenpot
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Ontario primary care reform and quality improvement activities: an environmental scan.

Authors:  Shannon L Sibbald; Charmaine McPherson; Anita Kothari
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2013-06-10       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.