Literature DB >> 19254510

Biomechanical comparison of screw versus plate/screw construct for talonavicular fusion.

Shelby E Jarrell1, John R Owen, Jennifer S Wayne, Robert S Adelaar.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Talonavicular fusion is performed for a variety of indications. This study examined the effects of fixation techniques on plantar pressures, construct stiffness, and strength.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eight matched pairs of cadaveric lower extremities were axially loaded intact and after talonavicular fixation with a 3.5 reconstruction plate, reconstruction plate plus cancellous screw (plate/screw), or three screws (screws). Recorded plantar pressures were divided into three forefoot, two midfoot, and two hindfoot regions. Cantilevered bending of excised constructs provided stiffness data for plantar and lateral directions, and failure characteristics in plantar bending.
RESULTS: Relative to the intact state, all fixations decreased peak pressure in the medial forefoot, while generally increasing it in the lateral forefoot and midfoot. Average pressure shifted laterally for all fixation methods in the forefoot, generally in the hindfoot and the lateral midfoot. Generally, contact areas decreased in the medial forefoot, midfoot, and hindfoot while increasing laterally in the midfoot and hindfoot. The only difference among fixation methods was a decreased medial midfoot contact area for screws. No differences were found between screws and plate/screw in bending stiffness or failure (p < 0.5 and p < 0.2 respectively). Plantar and lateral bending stiffness for the plate/screw method averaged approximately 363 N/mm while stiffness of the screw only construct averaged approximately 380 N/mm. The load to failure averaged 946 N for the plate/screw construct and 1099 N for the screw construct.
CONCLUSION: This study showed lateralization of plantar pressures following talonavicular fixation. Minimal differences were found between plate/screw and screws. Fixation across the joint may be key to achieving stability sufficient to resist shear and rotational stresses. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Plate/screw or screws would likely be similarly effective in fusing the talonavicular joint. However, the fusion induced lateralization of plantar pressures may unintentionally result in adjacent joint arthritis and foot pain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19254510     DOI: 10.3113/FAI-2009-0150

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Foot Ankle Int        ISSN: 1071-1007            Impact factor:   2.827


  5 in total

1.  Arthrodesis of the talonavicular joint using angle-stable mini-plates: a prospective study.

Authors:  Philipp Lechler; Stephanie Graf; Franz Xaver Köck; Jens Schaumburger; Joachim Grifka; Martin Handel
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-10-06       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  A new method for achieving compression in hindfoot arthrodesis.

Authors:  Justin Greisberg; J Turner Vosseller; Chris Ferry; Calvin Nash; Thomas R Gardner
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  [Osteosynthesis of talonavicular fusion with a claw plate and compression screw].

Authors:  J Hamel; M Nell
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2014-12-19       Impact factor: 1.154

4.  Individual headless compression screws fixed with three-dimensional image processing technology improves fusion rates of isolated talonavicular arthrodesis.

Authors:  Mei-Ming Xie; Kang Xia; Hong-Xin Zhang; Hong-Hui Cao; Zhi-Jin Yang; Hai-Feng Cui; Shang Gao; Kang-Lai Tang
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2017-01-23       Impact factor: 2.359

5.  Development of a Robotic Assembly for Analyzing the Instantaneous Axis of Rotation of the Foot Ankle Complex.

Authors:  Kelly N Salb; Daniel M Wido; Thomas E Stewart; Denis J DiAngelo
Journal:  Appl Bionics Biomech       Date:  2016-03-23       Impact factor: 1.781

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.