Literature DB >> 19253060

The estimated risk of miscarriage should be corrected for induced abortion rates.

Anne Eskild1, Lars J Vatten, Britt-Ingjerd Nesheim, Siri Vangen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We wanted to study to what extent induced abortion rates influence the age-dependent estimates of miscarriage risk.
DESIGN: Register-based study.
SETTING: Linkage between hospital records and the Norwegian Population Registry. POPULATION: Included were all women 15-49 years of age in Oslo, Norway, who were pregnant during the three-year study period, 27,932 women.
METHODS: We estimated proportions with miscarriage according to maternal age with and without inclusion of women with induced abortion in the denominator. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Proportions with miscarriage in each age group and odds ratios of miscarriage, with age group 25-29 years as the reference.
RESULTS: When only women with pregnancies intended to term were included in the denominator, 9.4% of the women were estimated to have miscarriage as the only reproductive event during the three-year period and 6.8% had both miscarriage and delivery. The corresponding figures when also women with induced abortions were included in the denominator, were 7.0 and 5.0%. When taking induced abortion into account, the reduction in estimated proportion with miscarriage during the study period was greatest in the age groups with the highest induced abortion rates, women 15-19 years old (from 22.8 to 6.4%) and women 45-49 years old (from 57.9 to 41.0%).
CONCLUSIONS: Estimates of age-dependent risk of miscarriage may be strongly influenced by induced abortion rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19253060     DOI: 10.1080/00016340902814567

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand        ISSN: 0001-6349            Impact factor:   3.636


  6 in total

1.  Trends in Risk of Pregnancy Loss Among US Women, 1990-2011.

Authors:  Lauren M Rossen; Katherine A Ahrens; Amy M Branum
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2017-10-20       Impact factor: 3.980

2.  Cost of unintended pregnancy in Norway: a role for long-acting reversible contraception.

Authors:  Nathaniel Henry; Max Schlueter; Julia Lowin; Ingrid Lekander; Anna Filonenko; James Trussell; Finn Egil Skjeldestad
Journal:  J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care       Date:  2014-12-23

3.  Role of maternal age and pregnancy history in risk of miscarriage: prospective register based study.

Authors:  Maria C Magnus; Allen J Wilcox; Nils-Halvdan Morken; Clarice R Weinberg; Siri E Håberg
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2019-03-20

4.  Pre-pregnancy lifestyle characteristics and risk of miscarriage: the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women's Health.

Authors:  Maria C Magnus; Richard L Hockey; Siri E Håberg; Gita D Mishra
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 3.007

5.  The role of intervening pregnancy loss in the association between interpregnancy interval and adverse pregnancy outcomes.

Authors:  Gizachew A Tessema; Siri E Håberg; Gavin Pereira; Maria C Magnus
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 7.331

6.  Spontaneous abortion and ectopic pregnancy: Case definition & guidelines for data collection, analysis, and presentation of maternal immunization safety data.

Authors:  Caroline E Rouse; Linda O Eckert; Isaac Babarinsa; Emily Fay; Manish Gupta; Margo S Harrison; Alison Tse Kawai; Elyse O Kharbanda; Merita Kucuku; Lee Meller; Tamala Mallett Moore; Maja Subelj; Sonali Kochhar; Fernanda Tavares-Da-Silva
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 3.641

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.