Literature DB >> 19252916

Modified approach to laparoscopic gastrostomy tube placement minimizes complications.

Mara B Antonoff1, Donavon J Hess, Daniel A Saltzman, Robert D Acton.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Complications from previously published techniques for laparoscopic gastrostomy tube placement include skin pressure necrosis and extraluminal migration. We developed a modified technique utilizing subcutaneous stay-sutures in order to minimize such complications. This study aimed to identify, quantify, and characterize complications of the modified procedure.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Charts were reviewed of all pediatric patients undergoing laparoscopic gastrostomy tube placement over 79 months. Complications requiring reoperation, readmission, or outpatient treatment were identified and classified as major or minor.
RESULTS: Laparoscopic gastrostomy tubes were placed via modified procedure in 82 patients. Two (2.44%) high-risk patients with significant comorbidities were readmitted for wound infections, two (2.44%) received outpatient antibiotics for cellulitis, and three (3.66%) developed stitch abscesses which resolved with local care. None of the patients had initial intraperitoneal placement, intraperitoneal location upon tube replacement, extraluminal migration, tube-related pressure necrosis, or procedure-related death.
CONCLUSION: Subcutaneous placement of absorbable stay-sutures for laparoscopic gastrostomy tubes offers significant benefits. We eliminated complications associated with presence of external sutures, as well as those associated with early suture removal. This modified technique avoids additional visits for suture removal, avoids pressure necrosis from external stay-sutures, and provides improved adherence of stomach to abdominal wall, thereby preventing extraluminal migration and intraperitoneal tube replacement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19252916     DOI: 10.1007/s00383-009-2340-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int        ISSN: 0179-0358            Impact factor:   1.827


  11 in total

1.  Complications following percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy and subsequent catheter replacement in children and young adults.

Authors:  V L Fox; S D Abel; S Malas; C Duggan; A M Leichtner
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 9.427

2.  Laparoscopic gastrostomy as an adjunctive procedure to laparoscopic fundoplication in children.

Authors:  L K Sampson; K E Georgeson; D C Winters
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  U-stitch laparoscopic gastrostomy technique has a low rate of complications and allows primary button placement: experience with 461 pediatric procedures.

Authors:  Charles J Aprahamian; Traci L Morgan; Carroll M Harmon; Keith E Georgeson; Douglas C Barnhart
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 1.878

Review 4.  Laparoscopic gastrostomy and fundoplication.

Authors:  K E Georgeson
Journal:  Pediatr Ann       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 1.132

5.  Laparoscopic vs percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube insertion: a new pediatric gold standard?

Authors:  Mohammed Zamakhshary; Mohammad Jamal; Geoffrey K Blair; James J Murphy; Eric M Webber; Erik D Skarsgard
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.545

6.  Complications of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy with or without concomitant antireflux surgery in 96 children.

Authors:  J M Hament; N M Bax; D C van der Zee; J E De Schryver; C Nesselaar
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.545

7.  Laparoscopic gastrostomy in infants and children.

Authors:  J T Tomicic; F I Luks; L Shalon; T F Tracy
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.191

8.  Morbidity in neurologically impaired children after percutaneous endoscopic versus Stamm gastrostomy.

Authors:  B H Cameron; G K Blair; J J Murphy; G C Fraser
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 9.427

9.  Complications associated with image-guided gastrostomy and gastrojejunostomy tubes in children.

Authors:  Jeremy N Friedman; Sabrina Ahmed; Bairbre Connolly; Peter Chait; Sanjay Mahant
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 7.124

10.  Percutaneous endoscopic placement of the "button" gastrostomy tube as the initial procedure in infants and children.

Authors:  W R Treem; N L Etienne; J S Hyams
Journal:  J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 2.839

View more
  4 in total

1.  Laparo-endoscopic Assisted Percutaneous Drainage Gastrostomy and Feeding Jejunostomy.

Authors:  Vishwanath Golash
Journal:  Oman Med J       Date:  2010-07

2.  To Button or Not to Button? Primary Gastrostomy Tubes Offer No Significant Advantage Over Buttons.

Authors:  Hector Osei; Armando Salim Munoz-Abraham; Alice Martino; Kaveer Chatoorgoon; Jose Greenspon; Colleen Fitzpatrick; Gustavo A Villalona
Journal:  Pediatr Gastroenterol Hepatol Nutr       Date:  2022-05-09

3.  Two port video-assisted gastrostomy and jejunostomy: technical simplification and clinical results.

Authors:  Paula Volpe; Carlos Eduardo Domene; Marco Aurélio Santo; Ivan Cecconello
Journal:  Arq Bras Cir Dig       Date:  2015

4.  Laparoscopic Gastrostomy in Children: 10 Years of Experience.

Authors:  Ufuk Ateş; Anar Gurbanov; Gülnur Göllü; Nil Yaşam Taştekin; Sümeyye Sözduyar; Ergün Ergün; Aydın Yağmurlu; Murat Çakmak; Tanju Aktuğ; Hüseyin Dindar; Meltem Bingöl Koloğlu
Journal:  Sisli Etfal Hastan Tip Bul       Date:  2018-09-23
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.