Literature DB >> 19252896

Gender-specific Constant score correction for age.

A Tavakkolizadeh1, A Ghassemi, T Colegate-Stone, A Latif, J Sinha.   

Abstract

To investigate the relationship between age, gender and the Constant score. Two hundred and seventy Healthy volunteers (527 normal shoulders) from our local population with no previous history of shoulder disease were assessed using the Constant score. The mean age was 43.9 years (16-86) and the mean Constant score 85.9 (56-100). The mean score was 88.1 (range 56-100) for men and 83.7 (range 60-100) for women. A mixed regression model estimated that, for the male population, the Constant score falls by 0.15 points per annum between the ages of 50 and 70 and by 1.3 points per year after the age of 70. Similarly, for the female population, the fall is of 0.25 per year between 60 and 70 and 0.35 after the age of 70. The changes are statistically significant (P < 0.01) and clinically important when comparing patients of different age groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19252896     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-009-0744-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  20 in total

Review 1.  The use of outcome scores in surgery of the shoulder.

Authors:  P Harvie; T C B Pollard; R J Chennagiri; A J Carr
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2005-02

2.  Intraobserver and interobserver reliability for the strength test in the Constant-Murley shoulder assessment.

Authors:  Kajsa M Johansson; Lars E Adolfsson
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2005 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.019

3.  A review of the Constant score: modifications and guidelines for its use.

Authors:  Christopher R Constant; Christian Gerber; Roger J H Emery; Jens Ole Søjbjerg; Frank Gohlke; Pascal Boileau
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2008-01-22       Impact factor: 3.019

4.  How should we use the Constant Score?--A commentary.

Authors:  Ulf Lillkrona
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2007-12-26       Impact factor: 3.019

5.  A standard method of shoulder strength measurement for the Constant score with a spring balance.

Authors:  M J Bankes; J E Crossman; R J Emery
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  1998 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.019

6.  A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder.

Authors:  C R Constant; A H Murley
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Shoulder symptoms in healthy athletes: a comparison of outcome scoring systems.

Authors:  J J Soldatis; J B Moseley; M Etminan
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  1997 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.019

8.  Normalization of the Constant score.

Authors:  Leonid I Katolik; Anthony A Romeo; Brian J Cole; Nikhil N Verma; Jennifer K Hayden; Bernard R Bach
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2005 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.019

9.  A comparison of methods for shoulder strength assessment and analysis of Constant score change in patients aged over fifty years in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  Michael J Walton; Julia C Walton; Laura A M Honorez; Victoria F Harding; W Angus Wallace
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2007-02-22       Impact factor: 3.019

10.  The normalization of data in the Constant-Murley score for the shoulder. A study conducted on 563 healthy subjects.

Authors:  F A Grassi; M S Tajana
Journal:  Chir Organi Mov       Date:  2003 Jan-Mar
View more
  10 in total

1.  Surgical treatment of Neer Group VI proximal humeral fractures: retrospective comparison of PHILOS® and hemiarthroplasty.

Authors:  Christian Spross; Andreas Platz; Matthias Erschbamer; Thomas Lattmann; Michael Dietrich
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-12-13       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  US-guided percutaneous treatment and physical therapy in rotator cuff calcific tendinopathy of the shoulder: outcome at 3 and 12 months.

Authors:  Giulio Pasquotti; Alex Faccinetto; Umberto Marchioro; Matteo Todisco; Vincenzo Baldo; Silvia Cocchio; Giorgio De Conti
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Value-based healthcare analysis of shoulder surgery for patients with symptomatic rotator cuff tears - Calculating the impact of arthroscopic cuff repair.

Authors:  C Holzer-Fleming; A Tavakkolizadeh; J Sinha; J Casey; J Moxham; Toby J Colegate-Stone
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2020-07-02

4.  Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty for Proximal Humerus Head-Split Fractures-A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Jan-Philipp Imiolczyk; Ulrich Brunner; Tankred Imiolczyk; Florian Freislederer; David Endell; Markus Scheibel
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 4.964

5.  Percutaneous ultrasound-guided treatment of shoulder tendon calcifications: Clinical and radiological follow-up at 6 months().

Authors:  G De Conti; U Marchioro; A Dorigo; N Boscolo; S Vio; M Trevisan; A Meneghini; V Baldo; F Angelini
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2010-11-19

6.  Comparing mini-open and arthroscopic acromioclavicular joint repair: functional results and return to sport.

Authors:  M Faggiani; G P Vasario; L Mattei; M J Calò; F Castoldi
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2016-06-10

7.  Results after primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty with and without subscapularis repair: a prospective-randomized trial.

Authors:  Nina Myline Engel; Malte Holschen; Domink Schorn; Kai-Axel Witt; Jörn Steinbeck
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 8.  Outcome assessment in the treatment of rotator cuff tear: what is utilized in Brazil?

Authors:  Jorge Henrique Assunção; Eduardo Angeli Malavolta; Vitor Rodrigues Domingues; Mauro Emilio Conforto Gracitelli; Arnaldo Amado Ferreira Neto
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop       Date:  2017-09-01

9.  Improvement in long head of biceps function and lower rate of biceps deformities after subpectoral tenodesis with cortical button and interference screw vs. arthroscopic tenotomy: a 4-year follow-up.

Authors:  Filipe Ferreira Carvalho; Philip-Christian Nolte; Joao Pinheiro; Thorsten Guehring; Michael Egenolf; Thomas Chatterjee
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2022-06-20

10.  Reconstruction or replacement? A challenging question in surgical treatment of complex humeral head fractures in the elderly.

Authors:  M Müller; F Greve; M Crönlein; M Zyskowski; S Pesch; P Biberthaler; C Kirchhoff; M Beirer
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-08-25       Impact factor: 2.928

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.