Literature DB >> 19252801

Facilities available in French hospitals treating acute stroke patients: comparison with 24 other European countries.

D Leys1, C Cordonnier, S Debette, W Hacke, E B Ringelstein, M Giroud, J L Mas, M Kaste.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the proportion of French hospitals meeting criteria for primary (PSC) or comprehensive (CSC) stroke centres, with that of 24 other European countries. We surveyed 121 randomly selected hospitals admitting stroke patients routinely in France and 765 in other European countries. We determined the proportion of hospitals meeting criteria for CSC and PSC according to the EUSI experts definition. The 121 selected hospitals had treated 37,778 patients in 2005 (mean 312), i.e. approximately 25% of all strokes supposed to have occurred in France. Eleven hospitals had an acute stroke care unit, versus 448 of 765 other Hospitals (OR 0.07; 95% CI, OR 0.04-0.13). rt-PA was given to 622 patients (2.2% of ischaemic strokes, versus 3.3% for the other countries). No hospital met criteria for CSC, and only 2 (1.7%) met criteria for PSC. Many facilities considered as necessary by experts were less available, especially personnel, brain CT-scan, ECG monitoring and rt-PA protocols. However, CT angiography 24 h/24, and air ambulance were more often available. Only a few French hospitals offer an optimal level of care for stroke patients. This result contrasts with the high cost of stroke care in France, suggesting an inappropriate use of resources. Conclusions useful for health administrators are: (i) to offer more facilities in reasonably equipped hospitals; (ii) to prevent admission of stroke patients in small under-equipped hospitals; (iii) to promote specific stroke nurse instruction; and (iv) to promote a better organisation of stroke care over the territory.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19252801     DOI: 10.1007/s00415-009-5029-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol        ISSN: 0340-5354            Impact factor:   4.849


  13 in total

1.  In a mailed physician survey, questionnaire length had a threshold effect on response rate.

Authors:  Christopher Jepson; David A Asch; John C Hershey; Peter A Ubel
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 2.  What are the components of effective stroke unit care?

Authors:  Peter Langhorne; Alex Pollock
Journal:  Age Ageing       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 10.668

3.  Thrombolysis with alteplase for acute ischaemic stroke in the Safe Implementation of Thrombolysis in Stroke-Monitoring Study (SITS-MOST): an observational study.

Authors:  Nils Wahlgren; Niaz Ahmed; Antoni Dávalos; Gary A Ford; Martin Grond; Werner Hacke; Michael G Hennerici; Markku Kaste; Sonja Kuelkens; Vincent Larrue; Kennedy R Lees; Risto O Roine; Lauri Soinne; Danilo Toni; Geert Vanhooren
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2007-01-27       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  [Recommendation for organization of special stroke departments (stroke units). 1997 implementation].

Authors:  E B Ringelstein
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 1.214

Review 5.  Treatment and secondary prevention of stroke: evidence, costs, and effects on individuals and populations.

Authors:  G J Hankey; C P Warlow
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1999-10-23       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 6.  Organised inpatient (stroke unit) care for stroke.

Authors: 
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2002

7.  The main components of stroke unit care: results of a European expert survey.

Authors:  Didier Leys; E Bernd Ringelstein; Markku Kaste; Werner Hacke
Journal:  Cerebrovasc Dis       Date:  2007-01-30       Impact factor: 2.762

8.  A comparison of the costs and survival of hospital-admitted stroke patients across Europe.

Authors:  R Grieve; J Hutton; A Bhalla; D Rastenytë; D Ryglewicz; C Sarti; M Lamassa; M Giroud; R Dundas; C D Wolfe
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 7.914

9.  [Management of stroke in France. Results of 3 national surveys].

Authors:  F Woimant; T De Broucker; P Vassel
Journal:  Rev Neurol (Paris)       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.607

Review 10.  How do stroke units improve patient outcomes? A collaborative systematic review of the randomized trials. Stroke Unit Trialists Collaboration.

Authors: 
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 7.914

View more
  3 in total

1.  Rate of intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke in the North-of-France region and evolution over time.

Authors:  N Dequatre-Ponchelle; H Touzani; A Banh; I Girard-Buttaz; R Coche; P Dobbelaere; C Cordonnier; M Girot; P Aguettaz; F Mounier-Vehier; E Wiel; N Bronet; E Josien; P Duhamel; M Mihout; A Maisonneuve; A Mackowiak; M Bodenant; P Williatte; X Leclerc; C Lefebvre; O Nigeon; P Devos; G Duncan; G Malanda; B Majed; O Dereeper; V Pégoraro; T Rosolacci; P Alarcon; E Koral; M Pasquini; S Verclytte; J B N'Kuendjo; J B Campagne; P Le Coz; J Devienne; Z Seth; R Tholliez; H Hénon; G Smith; F Dumont; F Agbemebia; J M Behra; D Pollet; P Coffin; P Lavau; A Vérier; C Lucas; N Smaiti; P Dalinval; J Dallongeville; P Valette; J P Pruvo; P Goldstein; D Leys
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 4.849

2.  The CT Swirl Sign Is Associated with Hematoma Expansion in Intracerebral Hemorrhage.

Authors:  D Ng; L Churilov; P Mitchell; R Dowling; B Yan
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Burden of stroke and other cardiovascular complications in patients with atrial fibrillation hospitalized in France.

Authors:  Francois-Emery Cotté; Gwendoline Chaize; Anne-Françoise Gaudin; Adeline Samson; Alexandre Vainchtock; Laurent Fauchier
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 5.214

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.