Literature DB >> 19252788

Intracortical excitability in patients with relapsing-remitting and secondary progressive multiple sclerosis.

A Conte1, D Lenzi, V Frasca, F Gilio, E Giacomelli, M Gabriele, C Marini Bettolo, E Iacovelli, P Pantano, C Pozzilli, M Inghilleri.   

Abstract

We designed this study to investigate possible correlations between variables measuring primary motor cortex excitability detected by single and paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and the severity of clinical manifestations in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). Thirty patients with MS in remission, 16 with relapsing-remitting (RR), 14 with secondary progressive disease (SP) and 17 healthy subjects participated in the study. In each subject, the central motor conduction time (CMCT) was calculated, and single-pulse and paired-pulse TMS at 3 and 10 ms interstimulus intervals was delivered over the primary motor cortex of the dominant hemisphere to measure the amplitude of motor-evoked potentials (MEPs), motor threshold (MTh), intracortical inhibition (ICI) and facilitation (ICF). Correlations were determined between the patients' TMS findings and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (lesion load) and clinical features (expanded disability status scale, EDSS score). EDSS scores were significantly higher in SPMS than in RRMS patients. The MTh was significantly higher, and the MEP was significantly smaller in SPMS patients than in RRMS patients and control subjects. All patients had longer CMCTs than healthy subjects. In all patients, paired-pulse TMS elicited an inhibited test MEP at the 3-ms ISI and a facilitated test MEP at the 10 ms ISI. Post hoc analysis showed that ICI was significantly lower in SPMS patients than in those with RRMS and healthy subjects. EDSS scores correlated significantly with TMS measures (MEP, ICI, CMCT and MTh), but not with MRI lesion load. It was found that intracortical excitability as measured with TMS differs according to the clinical course of MS; it remains normal in patients with low EDSS scores and is altered in patients with high EDSS scores.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19252788     DOI: 10.1007/s00415-009-5047-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol        ISSN: 0340-5354            Impact factor:   4.849


  31 in total

Review 1.  Plasticity after acute ischaemic stroke studied by transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  S J Boniface
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 10.154

2.  The role of magnetic stimulation as a quantifier of motor disability in patients with multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  R H Kandler; J A Jarratt; G A Davies-Jones; E J Gumpert; G S Venables; H J Sagar; A Zeman
Journal:  J Neurol Sci       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 3.181

3.  Stimulation of motor tracts in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  A Berardelli; M Inghilleri; G Cruccu; M Fornarelli; N Accornero; M Manfredi
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 10.154

4.  Magnetization transfer magnetic resonance imaging and clinical changes in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Celia Oreja-Guevara; Arnaud Charil; Domenico Caputo; Rosella Cavarretta; Maria Pia Sormani; Massimo Filippi
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  2006-05

5.  Motor cortex excitability and fatigue in multiple sclerosis: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study.

Authors:  J Liepert; D Mingers; C Heesen; T Bäumer; C Weiller
Journal:  Mult Scler       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 6.312

6.  Defining the clinical course of multiple sclerosis: results of an international survey. National Multiple Sclerosis Society (USA) Advisory Committee on Clinical Trials of New Agents in Multiple Sclerosis.

Authors:  F D Lublin; S C Reingold
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 9.910

7.  An electrophysiological study of the mechanism of fatigue in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  G L Sheean; N M Murray; J C Rothwell; D H Miller; A J Thompson
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 13.501

8.  Quantification of MRI lesion load in multiple sclerosis: a comparison of three computer-assisted techniques.

Authors:  J Grimaud; M Lai; J Thorpe; P Adeleine; L Wang; G J Barker; D L Plummer; P S Tofts; W I McDonald; D H Miller
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.546

Review 9.  Grey matter pathology in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Jeroen J G Geurts; Frederik Barkhof
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 44.182

10.  Disability and lesion load in MS: a reassessment with MS functional composite score and 3D fast FLAIR.

Authors:  Olga Ciccarelli; Peter A Brex; Alan J Thompson; David H Miller
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.849

View more
  18 in total

1.  Cortical excitability changes over time in progressive multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Samar S Ayache; Alain Créange; Wassim H Farhat; Hela G Zouari; Catherine Lesage; Ulrich Palm; Mohammed Abdellaoui; Jean-Pascal Lefaucheur
Journal:  Funct Neurol       Date:  2015 Oct-Dec

2.  Altered sensorimotor cortical oscillations in individuals with multiple sclerosis suggests a faulty internal model.

Authors:  David J Arpin; Elizabeth Heinrichs-Graham; James E Gehringer; Rana Zabad; Tony W Wilson; Max J Kurz
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 3.  Cerebral hypoperfusion: a new pathophysiologic concept in multiple sclerosis?

Authors:  Miguel D'haeseleer; Stéphanie Hostenbach; Ilse Peeters; Souraya El Sankari; Guy Nagels; Jacques De Keyser; Marie B D'hooghe
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 6.200

4.  Cognitive and cortical plasticity deficits correlate with altered amyloid-β CSF levels in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Francesco Mori; Silvia Rossi; Giulia Sancesario; Claudia Codecà; Giorgia Mataluni; Fabrizia Monteleone; Fabio Buttari; Hajime Kusayanagi; Maura Castelli; Caterina Motta; Valeria Studer; Giorgio Bernardi; Giacomo Koch; Sergio Bernardini; Diego Centonze
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2010-10-13       Impact factor: 7.853

5.  A reduced somatosensory gating response in individuals with multiple sclerosis is related to walking impairment.

Authors:  David J Arpin; James E Gehringer; Tony W Wilson; Max J Kurz
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 6.  Advances in multiple sclerosis research in 2009.

Authors:  Stefan Nessler; Wolfgang Brück
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2010-08-06       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 7.  Synaptopathy connects inflammation and neurodegeneration in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Georgia Mandolesi; Antonietta Gentile; Alessandra Musella; Diego Fresegna; Francesca De Vito; Silvia Bullitta; Helena Sepman; Girolama A Marfia; Diego Centonze
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2015-11-20       Impact factor: 42.937

8.  Relating brain damage to brain plasticity in patients with multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Valentina Tomassini; Heidi Johansen-Berg; Saad Jbabdi; Richard G Wise; Carlo Pozzilli; Jacqueline Palace; Paul M Matthews
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2012-02-09       Impact factor: 3.919

9.  Evidence of impaired brain activity balance after passive sensorimotor stimulation in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Nikolaos Petsas; Emanuele Tinelli; Delia Lenzi; Valentina Tomassini; Emilia Sbardella; Francesca Tona; Eytan Raz; Valter Nucciarelli; Carlo Pozzilli; Patrizia Pantano
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  The Neurophysiologist Perspective into MS Plasticity.

Authors:  Elise Houdayer; Giancarlo Comi; Letizia Leocani
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 4.003

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.