A S Barritt1, M R Arguedas. 1. Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7080, United States. abarritt@unch.unc.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Guidelines recommend screening for gastroesophageal varices. Regional studies suggest screening is underutilized, but information from across the United States is unavailable. We explored practice patterns and adherence to guidelines in a random sample of physicians and sought to define whether differences existed according to practice type, setting and years of practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Surveys were randomly sent to 600 gastroenterologists and hepatologists. Descriptive data is presented as percentage and comparisons were performed by chi-square analysis. Significance was defined at a p value <0.05. RESULTS: 180 completed surveys were returned. Mean age was 48.9+/-10 years and 87% were male. 50% were community-based and 74% had been in practice >10 years. 53% (78% hepatologists versus 45% of gastroenterologists) screened consistently (>75% of the time), (p<0.001). No differences in screening frequency were found according to practice setting or years in practice. 62% screened all cirrhotics whereas 38% screened based on clinical characteristics. In patients without gastroesophageal varices, 60% repeated esophagogastroduodenoscopy in 2-3 years. In those with small gastroesophageal varices, repeat esophagogastroduodenoscopy was recommended in 1-2 years by 73%. In patients with small and large varices, 40% and 54% of physicians respectively, recommended prophylaxis. 6% of physicians recommend prophylaxis regardless of the presence or size of varices. CONCLUSIONS: Screening for varices is under-implemented. Many screened based on clinical findings that have not been shown to reliably predict high-risk gastroesophageal varices. Continued education and removal of financial barriers to screening are central to increasing screening rates and improving patient outcomes.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Guidelines recommend screening for gastroesophageal varices. Regional studies suggest screening is underutilized, but information from across the United States is unavailable. We explored practice patterns and adherence to guidelines in a random sample of physicians and sought to define whether differences existed according to practice type, setting and years of practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Surveys were randomly sent to 600 gastroenterologists and hepatologists. Descriptive data is presented as percentage and comparisons were performed by chi-square analysis. Significance was defined at a p value <0.05. RESULTS: 180 completed surveys were returned. Mean age was 48.9+/-10 years and 87% were male. 50% were community-based and 74% had been in practice >10 years. 53% (78% hepatologists versus 45% of gastroenterologists) screened consistently (>75% of the time), (p<0.001). No differences in screening frequency were found according to practice setting or years in practice. 62% screened all cirrhotics whereas 38% screened based on clinical characteristics. In patients without gastroesophageal varices, 60% repeated esophagogastroduodenoscopy in 2-3 years. In those with small gastroesophageal varices, repeat esophagogastroduodenoscopy was recommended in 1-2 years by 73%. In patients with small and large varices, 40% and 54% of physicians respectively, recommended prophylaxis. 6% of physicians recommend prophylaxis regardless of the presence or size of varices. CONCLUSIONS: Screening for varices is under-implemented. Many screened based on clinical findings that have not been shown to reliably predict high-risk gastroesophageal varices. Continued education and removal of financial barriers to screening are central to increasing screening rates and improving patient outcomes.
Authors: Shawn R McMahon; Martha Iwamoto; Mehran S Massoudi; Hussain R Yusuf; John M Stevenson; Felicita David; Susan Y Chu; Larry K Pickering Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2003-04 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Miguel R Arguedas; Gustavo R Heudebert; Mohamad A Eloubeidi; Gary A Abrams; Michael B Fallon Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2002-09 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: N Chalasani; T F Imperiale; A Ismail; G Sood; M Carey; C M Wilcox; H Madichetty; P Y Kwo; T D Boyer Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 1999-11 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: Seth D Crockett; Isaac M Lipkus; Stephanie D Bright; Richard E Sampliner; Kenneth K Wang; Vikram Boolchand; Lori S Lutzke; Nicholas J Shaheen Journal: Gastrointest Endosc Date: 2011-11-17 Impact factor: 9.427