Alexander B Olawaiye1, David M Boruta. 1. University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC), Magee-Women's Hospital, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvaniaa, PA 15213, USA. olawaiyea@upmc.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Clear cell endometrial cancer (CCE) is an uncommon but important disease because of its aggressive behavior. Furthermore, prospective, randomized studies are either too difficult or impossible because of the small number of women affected. This review explores the differences between clear cell and endometrioid endometrial cancer. In addition, it uses available evidence to determine the best approach to management. METHODS: Medline was searched between January 1, 1966 and December 31, 2008 for all publications in English where the studied population included women diagnosed with CCE. Qualifying studies must have had at least 30 patients. RESULTS: Clear cell histology is diagnosed in less than 6% of all endometrial cancers and its incidence increases with age. Diagnosis can be made using the same tests that are used in the diagnosis of other types of endometrial cancer. Clear cell histology is morphologically and genetically different from the more prevalent endometrioid endometrial cancer histology. It shares many similarities with clear cell neoplasms of the ovary and kidney. Comprehensive surgical staging is critical in order to plan appropriate postoperative management. Adjuvant pelvic and/or whole abdominal radiotherapy have not been shown to be clearly beneficial in women diagnosed with clear cell endometrial cancer. Adjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatinum, taxol and doxorubicin either in a doublet or triplet combination has demonstrated efficacy. CONCLUSIONS: Women diagnosed with CCE require comprehensive surgical staging. Platinum based adjuvant chemotherapy in a doublet or triplet format in combination with paclitaxel and/or doxorubicin should be considered as part of treatment of these women. Careful long term surveillance following treatment is indicated given the higher rate of recurrence compared to endometrioid endometrial cancer.
OBJECTIVE:Clear cell endometrial cancer (CCE) is an uncommon but important disease because of its aggressive behavior. Furthermore, prospective, randomized studies are either too difficult or impossible because of the small number of women affected. This review explores the differences between clear cell and endometrioid endometrial cancer. In addition, it uses available evidence to determine the best approach to management. METHODS: Medline was searched between January 1, 1966 and December 31, 2008 for all publications in English where the studied population included women diagnosed with CCE. Qualifying studies must have had at least 30 patients. RESULTS: Clear cell histology is diagnosed in less than 6% of all endometrial cancers and its incidence increases with age. Diagnosis can be made using the same tests that are used in the diagnosis of other types of endometrial cancer. Clear cell histology is morphologically and genetically different from the more prevalent endometrioid endometrial cancer histology. It shares many similarities with clear cell neoplasms of the ovary and kidney. Comprehensive surgical staging is critical in order to plan appropriate postoperative management. Adjuvant pelvic and/or whole abdominal radiotherapy have not been shown to be clearly beneficial in women diagnosed with clear cell endometrial cancer. Adjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatinum, taxol and doxorubicin either in a doublet or triplet combination has demonstrated efficacy. CONCLUSIONS:Women diagnosed with CCE require comprehensive surgical staging. Platinum based adjuvant chemotherapy in a doublet or triplet format in combination with paclitaxel and/or doxorubicin should be considered as part of treatment of these women. Careful long term surveillance following treatment is indicated given the higher rate of recurrence compared to endometrioid endometrial cancer.
Authors: Eman Abdulfatah; Sharif Sakr; Sumi Thomas; Zaid Al-Wahab; David G Mutch; Sean Dowdy; Sudeshna Bandyopadhyay; Adnan Munkarah; Mohamed Elshaikh; Robert Morris; Rouba Ali-Fehmi Journal: Int J Gynecol Cancer Date: 2017-10 Impact factor: 3.437
Authors: Katherine C Kurnit; Rebecca A Previs; Pamela T Soliman; Shannon N Westin; Ann H Klopp; Bryan M Fellman; Karen H Lu; Lois M Ramondetta; Nicole D Fleming Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2018-11-08 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Minsi Zhang; T Jonathan Yang; Neil B Desai; Deborah DeLair; Marisa A Kollmeier; Vicky Makker; Mario M Leitao; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum; Kaled M Alektiar Journal: Brachytherapy Date: 2018-10-10 Impact factor: 2.362
Authors: Oluwole Fadare; Katja Gwin; Mohamed M Desouki; Marta A Crispens; Howard W Jones; Dineo Khabele; Sharon X Liang; Wenxin Zheng; Khaled Mohammed; Jonathan L Hecht; Vinita Parkash Journal: Mod Pathol Date: 2013-03-22 Impact factor: 7.842
Authors: Oluwole Fadare; Wenxin Zheng; Marta A Crispens; Howard W Iii Jones; Dineo Khabele; Katja Gwin; Sharon X Liang; Khaled Mohammed; Mohamed M Desouki; Vinita Parkash; Jonathan L Hecht Journal: Am J Cancer Res Date: 2013-01-18 Impact factor: 6.166