Literature DB >> 19250600

Multifocal visual evoked potential responses to pattern-reversal, pattern-onset, pattern-offset, and sparse pulse stimuli.

Brad Fortune1, Shaban Demirel, Bang V Bui.   

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to compare standard multifocal visual evoked potential (mfVEP) pattern-reversal responses with those produced by pattern-onset, pattern-offset, and pulsed pattern stimuli. mfVEP recordings were obtained from five normal subjects using VERIS and a 4-electrode array. The standard reversal stimulus had 2(15) m-sequence steps (7.5-min duration). Pattern-onset and -offset responses were evaluated using sequences that all had 32 frames per m-step and 2(10) total steps (7.5 min); but the duration of the contrast step varied so that it was 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, or 16 of the 32 frames. The same series was also inverted so that adapting contrast was high and the stimulus step began with a contrast decrement. The effect of temporal sparseness was studied with positive contrast pulses (two-frame duration) within 16, 20, 24, 28, or 32 frames per m-step (all had 2(11) total steps). Four stimulus locations were isolated to study the effect of spatial sparseness. Standard mfVEP reversal responses were virtually identical to onset responses throughout the field, but ~3.5 times smaller. Responses to pattern onset were about twice as large as those for offset, especially in the lower hemifield, irrespective of adapting contrast level. Offset responses exhibited a different waveform compared with reversal, onset, or brief pulse responses. Though temporally sparse pattern-pulse responses were ~3.5 times larger than standard reversal responses, there was no improvement in signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). However, spatial isolation increased SNR by 22% for reversal responses and by 62% for temporally sparse pulses. Temporally sparse pattern-pulse stimuli do not improve mfVEP SNR unless they are also spatially sparse, suggesting that lateral inhibitory mechanisms have a greater impact than temporal contrast gain control mechanisms. The mfVEP response depends on the polarity of a contrast step, irrespective of the state of contrast adaptation.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19250600     DOI: 10.1017/S0952523808080954

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vis Neurosci        ISSN: 0952-5238            Impact factor:   3.241


  6 in total

1.  Comparison of cathode ray tube and liquid crystal display stimulators for use in multifocal VEP.

Authors:  Marÿke Fox; Colin Barber; David Keating; Alan Perkins
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Exploiting individual primary visual cortex geometry to boost steady state visual evoked potentials.

Authors:  M Isabel Vanegas; Annabelle Blangero; Simon P Kelly
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2013-04-03       Impact factor: 5.379

3.  Multifocal visual evoked potentials and contrast sensitivity correlate with ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer thickness in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Divya Narayanan; Han Cheng; Rosa A Tang; Laura J Frishman
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 3.708

4.  Comparison of multifocal visual evoked potential, standard automated perimetry and optical coherence tomography in assessing visual pathway in multiple sclerosis patients.

Authors:  Michal Laron; Han Cheng; Bin Zhang; Jade S Schiffman; Rosa A Tang; Laura J Frishman
Journal:  Mult Scler       Date:  2010-03-05       Impact factor: 6.312

5.  Comparison of the reliability of multifocal visual evoked cortical potentials generated by pattern reversal and pattern pulse stimulation.

Authors:  G S Souza; H B Schakelford; A L A Moura; B D Gomes; D F Ventura; M E C Fitzgerald; L C L Silveira
Journal:  Braz J Med Biol Res       Date:  2012-07-12       Impact factor: 2.590

6.  Clustered Volleys Stimulus Presentation for Multifocal Objective Perimetry.

Authors:  Corinne F Carle; Andrew C James; Faran Sabeti; Maria Kolic; Rohan W Essex; Chris Shean; Rhiannon Jeans; Aiasha Saikal; Alice Licinio; Ted Maddess
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 3.283

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.