| Literature DB >> 19250506 |
R John Dobbs1, Sylvia M Dobbs, Clive Weller, André Charlett, Ingvar T Bjarnason, Alan Curry, David S Ellis, Mohammad A A Ibrahim, Maria V McCrossan, John O'Donohue, Robert J Owen, Norman L Oxlade, Ashley B Price, Jeremy D Sanderson, Malur Sudhanva, John Williams.
Abstract
We challenge the concept of idiopathic parkinsonism (IP) as inevitably progressive neurodegeneration, proposing a natural history of sequential microbial insults with predisposing host response. Proof-of-principle that infection can contribute to IP was provided by case studies and a placebo-controlled efficacy study of Helicobacter eradication. "Malignant" IP appears converted to "benign", but marked deterioration accompanies failure. Similar benefit on brady/hypokinesia from eradicating "low-density" infection favors autoimmunity. Although a minority of UK probands are urea breath test positive for Helicobacter, the predicted probability of having the parkinsonian label depends on the serum H. pylori antibody profile, with clinically relevant gradients between this "discriminant index" and disease burden and progression. In IP, H. pylori antibodies discriminate for persistently abnormal bowel function, and specific abnormal duodenal enterocyte mitochondrial morphology is described in relation to H. pylori infection. Slow intestinal transit manifests as constipation from the prodrome. Diarrhea may flag secondary small-intestinal bacterial overgrowth. This, coupled with genetically determined intense inflammatory response, might explain evolution from brady/hypokinetic to rigidity-predominant parkinsonism.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2008 PMID: 19250506 PMCID: PMC7165675 DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-5378.2008.00622.x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Helicobacter ISSN: 1083-4389 Impact factor: 5.753
Generation of an “Infection Hypothesis” for idiopathic parkinsonism (IP), implicating the gut
| Year | Statistical model | Findings |
|---|---|---|
| 1992 [ | Observational comparison nocturnal axial rotation in elderly IP probands, their spouses and control couples. | Rotation in spouses less than in controls, greater than in probands. |
| 1993/4/6 [ | Comparison measured facets of parkinsonism in elderly probands, their spouses, control couples. | Spouses significantly different from controls (toward parkinsonism) in measures of brady/hypokinesia, postural abnormality, rigidity, and frequency of seborrheic dermatitis. |
| 1997/8 [ | Relationship serum immunoglobulin concentrations to presence/ absence of (i) Diagnosed IP, (ii) A parkinsonian feature in subjects without diagnosed parkinsonism, (iii) Specified medication in IP probands. | (i) No overall difference in IgM, A, or G with IP. |
| 1997/8 [ | (i) Comparison between IP probands and controls of current and estimated past frequency of defecation. (ii) Association serum IgA with a discriminant index for presence/ absence parkinsonism based on current bowel habit. (iii) Relative effect of tobacco smoking on bowel habit. | (i) Frequency less in probands prodromally (from fourth decade of life). (ii) IgA increased with index irrespective of subject group. (iii) Differential effect of smoking on “difficulty passing a motion”: laxative‐like effect greater in controls. |
| 1998 [ | Comparison serum cortisol in IP probands and controls, taking into account: (i) Current or past smoking, (ii) Anti‐parkinsonian medication and laxatives in IP. | Cortisol higher in IP. In controls, the lower the cortisol, the shorter the stride and the more the deterioration over 4 years: relationship inverted in IP.
(i) Smoking tended to be associated with lower cortisol, irrespective of group.
(ii) Levodopa and dopaminergic agonists did not affect cortisol; selegiline and antimuscarinics |
| 1999 [ | Comparison serum IL‐6 and TNF‐α in IP probands and controls. | IL‐6 increased with age, effect of IP equivalent to more than 10 years of ageing.
TNF‐α increased with age, not IP. Elevated in probands with impaired postural and psychomotor responses, suppressed with normal responses, in contrast to lack of performance relationship in controls. |
No correlation between partners, effect independent of bed sharing.
Lymphopenia [23, 26] in IP may abrogate any overall difference in immunoglobulins present in prodrome. Higher IgA in IP with constipation likely to reflect small‐intestinal bacterial overgrowth.
Constipation is dose‐related adverse effect.
Paradoxical decrease with antimuscarinics explained by central cholingeric effects.
Differences in inflammatory response may determine predominant facets between and within individual(s). TNF‐α, tumor necrosis factor alpha; IL‐6, interleukin‐6.
Generation of “Helicobacter Hypothesis” for idiopathic parkinsonism (IP)
| Year | Statistical model | Findings |
|---|---|---|
| 1999 [ | Observational comparison of facets of parkinsonism, and | Siblings significantly different from controls (toward parkinsonism) in measures of brady/hypokinesia, rigidity, abnormal posture, and frequency seborrhea/seborrheic dermatitis. Odds ratio of 3 for seropositivity in probands and siblings cf. controls. |
| 1999 [ | Explanation of facets of syndrome by | Seropositivity unrelated to presence/absence facets in those who have not passed diagnostic threshold, but decreased with abnormal posture in IP. |
| 1999 [ | Relationship of increase in serum IL‐6 and TNF‐α with age, and in IL‐6 and cortisol with parkinsonism, to | These immune/inflammatory responses not explained by antibodies measured in routine ELISA. |
| 2000 [ | Explanation of increase in serum cortisol with IP, over that in controls, by presence/absence of antibodies against VacA, CagA, and urease‐B. | Effect of antibodies independent of disease status: anti‐VacA seropositivity associated with elevated cortisol, IP with additional elevation, neither anti‐urease nor anti‐CagA adding to variance explained. |
| 2000 [ | (i) Contrast of relationship of | (i) Birth‐cohort effect in ELISA value (EV), seen in controls, obliterated in IP. Probands twice as likely to be seropositive before 72.5 years. |
| (ii) Relationship of titer to severity IP. | (ii) EV lower with greater global disease severity. | |
| 2000 [ | Contrast of relationship of serum immunoglobulin classes to | In controls, downward shift in IgM with anti‐urease positivity (equivalent to 25 years ageing). In IP, IgM higher than in controls in seropositive, |
| 2000 [ | Discrimination for seborrheic dermatitis by | Discriminant index for presence characteristic rash contained anti‐CagA (directly associated) and anti‐VacA (inversely). |
| 2005 [ | Contrast of relationship between being underweight and inflammatory products in subjects with and without diagnosed parkinsonism. | Association of low body mass index with serum IL‐6 concentration specific to parkinsonism, unlike that with anti‐VacA and anti‐CagA. |
| 2005 [ | Explanation of failure of | Failed eradication associated with lower B‐cell count. |
| 2005/6 [ | Comparison blood counts in IP probands and their spouses with routine general practitioner requests | Total lymphocyte counts in spouses and untreated probands similar, lower than in controls. Higher counts in probands and spouses with VacA antibody. Count in IP not explained by serum B12 or folate. Probands’ CD4+, CD8+ and CD19+ counts lower than in spouses, but CD16+56+ higher. |
| 2005 [ | Discrimination for parkinsonism, and explanation of its severity and progression, by | Predicted probability of being labeled parkinsonian greatest with anti‐CagA seropositivity and anti‐VacA and ‐urease‐B negativity. |
| 2007 [ | Discrimination for abnormal bowel function (constipation and/or diarrhea) in IP probands and their spouses by | Bowel function abnormal in 53% probands and in 36% spouses. Fourfold increase in odds for abnormal function with urease‐B band, sixfold decrement with outer‐membrane protein band, irrespective of urea breath test status, nature of abnormality, or subject group. Irritable bowel syndrome (15%) had same band associates. |
In contrast ELISA seropositivity not increased in (older) spouses (unpublished data further to [62]).
b H. pylori antigens, other than urease, are known to stimulate cytokine production [47]. They, like serum immunoglobulin classes [65], may be associated with facets of parkinsonism in prodrome/early disease. Helicobacter infection is more likely a forerunner of postural abnormality and global severity in IP, than protective.
Although CD19+ count is low [26], there may be increase in naïve B‐cells, or B1 cells, producing polyspecific IgM. Alternatively, local sequestration of IgM may fail in IP.
In IP, seborrheic dermatitis occasional flares up on treatment of H. pylori (personal observation).
There may be incomplete immune tolerance, regulatory T‐lymphocytes recognizing H. pylori but not CagA; or infection may be truncated, but cagA gene, its product or antibodies against CagA persist.
Increased natural killer cells in IP indicate preserved innate response and ongoing viral, bacterial, or parasitic infection. TNF‐α, tumor necrosis factor alpha; IL‐6, interleukin‐6.
Figure 1Frames, at 2 second intervals from videos over a fixed course, in an idiopathic parkinsonism (IP) patient before (top) and 6 weeks (below), 18 weeks (below again), and 1 year (bottom) after biopsy‐proven eradication of H. pylori. Initial detection by molecular microbiology on culture‐negative antral and corporal biopsies. The patient can now cycle 10 miles, and continues not to require anti‐IP medication. It took 6 frames to cover the course initially, 4 or fewer subsequently. The initial gait was tentative, stilted, wooden and doll‐like. Subsequently, it became relaxed, free‐flowing and, finally, vigorous. (Reproduced with patient's consent.)
Figure 2Scheme for process (green), mechanisms (pink), and outcome (blue) in idiopathic parkinsonism. Stage 1 is an autoimmune reaction to Helicobacter infection; Stage 2, a dose‐related response to inflammatory products of small‐intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO). *Bolus release of antigen accompanying failed eradication may accelerate deterioration [23].
Figure 3Electron micrographs of duodenal enterocytes from idiopathic parkinsonism patients. Above: double membraned, encapsulated arrays lie among normal mitochondria. Arrays are seen mainly transversely on the left (appearing tubular), longitudinally on the right. In this section every enterocyte contained 2 or 3 such bodies. Below: long thin mitochondria are seen to predominate at low magnification (left). Complex branching of a mitochondrion is shown at intermediate magnification (right).
Figure 4Overview of events contributing to natural history of idiopathic parkinsonism (IP).
Figure 5Scheme for within‐ and between‐subject determinants of position in a spectrum from isolated functional bowel disease to co‐manifestation with parkinsonism.
Figure 6A prognostic index for parkinsonism [based on brady/hypokinesia variables in 104 subjects with idiopathic parkinsonism (IP), 144 withou] applied in 20 index controls (C), their spouses (Cs), 20 probands (P) with clinically definite (treated) IP, and their spouses (Ps). Means (95% confidence interval) are shown. P and C were matched for age and gender. p < .0001 for predicted probability in Ps cf. C + Cs combined [62].
Classification of viral and other intracellular microbial targets by clinical clues
| Clinical feature compatible with: (description) | Target |
|---|---|
| Upper respiratory tract symptoms (rhinitis, post‐nasal catarrh, eye injection) | Adenovirus |
| Human meta‐pneumovirus | |
| Influenza A virus | |
| Influenza B virus | |
| Parainfluenza viruses 1, 2, and 3 | |
| Respiratory syncytial virus subtypes A and B | |
| Rhinovirus | |
| Hot sweats (especially at night) | Epstein–Barr virus |
| Duodenitis | Adenovirus |
| Cytomegalovirus | |
| Enterovirus | |
| Mycoplasma [ | |
| Diarrhea | Aichi virus |
| Astrovirus | |
| Bocavirus | |
| Coronavirus | |
| Enteric adenovirus | |
| Norovirus | |
| Parvovirus | |
| Rotavirus | |
| Sapovirus | |
| Torovirus | |
| Bloating and constipation related to slow transit (consequent on damage to enteric nervous system) | Enterovirus |
| Lymphopenia | Cytomegalovirus |
| Epstein–Barr virus | |
| Hepatitis C virus | |
| Human immunodeficiency virus 1 and 2 | |
| Human T‐lymphotropic virus 1 and 2 | |
| Parvovirus B19 | |
| Herpes simplex virus I and II | |
| Varicella zoster virus | |
| Human herpes virus 6 | |
| Toxoplasma gondii | |
| Urinary frequency | Chlamydia trachomatis |
Includes viruses associated with laryngitis. Rhinitis sometimes coincides with diarrheal attack. Risk of developing IP over 20 years is 2.9 times greater in those with hayfever/allergic rhinitis [98]. Droplet‐spread infection proposed reason for higher risk IP in teachers and health workers [99].
Also relevant to isolated pharyngitis.
Associated with gastroenteritis, but causality in humans unproven (except SARS coronavirus).
Belongs to family group causing wide spectrum of systemic illnesses in humans/other mammals.
Infect via gastrointestinal tract. Not primarily a cause of gastroenteritis but may cause gastrointestinal upset. Cause illness ranging from mild non‐specific fevers/myalgia to meningitis/poliomyelitis.
Potentially persistent viruses that can cause insidious human disease and lymphopenia (or pancytopenia).
Associated with atypical lymphocytes, rather than lymphopenia.
Strategy and approach to etiology/pathogenesis of an idiopathic parkinsonism
| Strategy | Approach |
|---|---|
|
| |
| Consider whole entity | Reject dividing syndrome by clinical minutiae and nature of cellular protein aggregates |
| Define clinical syndrome and be aware of overlap diseases | Assemble all raw clinical clues, without selectivity |
| Avoid focusing on tip of an iceberg in a disease with a long prodrome | Early disease may hold clues masked in later stages. Indeed, solution may be untenable without acknowledging preclinical state. |
| Question adequacy of measurement methodology | Reject subjective global scores. Embrace valid, sensitive/specific, reliable measures (objective where possible) of disease facets, which can identify clinically relevant changes with time or intervention. |
| Adopt exploratory statistical methodology for hypothesis generation; defer any pragmatic testing | Seek to explain clues by associations. Measure potential biologic effect in small well‐defined subject groups, taking into account candidate confounders and effect modifiers. Carefully select control groups, avoiding convenient family (including spouses) and close contacts. |
|
| |
| Collect observational data to generate statistical models, each focusing on different clue(s) or addressing a different question | Identify associations and effects. Adjustments for multiple comparisons are inappropriate: false positives are not anathema at this stage, but failing to notice (or falsely rejecting) leads is. |
| Retain “odd‐ball” results, pending future insights | Avoid peer pressures to conform, and demands for repetition. |
|
| |
| Seek coherent explanation of associations with each clinical clue | Look for biologically plausible explanations and connections |
| Identify pieces which appear not to fit | Present conundrum to diverse experts to gain fresh insights. |
| Conduct pragmatic studies when testable cause/effect hypothesis generated | Obtain case study evidence for appropriateness of interventions licensed for treating suspected etiologic agent (i.e. explore a “new indication”). Proceed to per‐protocol analysis of randomized efficacy study of effect on facets of syndrome. |
| Where novel intervention is needed, seek pharmaceutical collaboration | Apply stages of pharmaceutical testing to candidate compounds with a view to licensing |
|
| |
| Define chain of events in natural history | Elucidate process mechanistically |
| Define hierarchical ordering of interventions in established cases | Tailor optimal treatment for an individual by screening tests |
| Plan for prophylaxis in early clinical syndrome and preclinical state | Identify core event(s) and perpetuating circumstance(s) |
|
| |
| Perform effectiveness studies on available interventions. | Use environmentally/genetically heterogeneous subject groups, with large sample size and outcome criteria appropriate to an effectiveness study. Use intention‐to‐treat analysis to give generalizable results on benefit. Continue to explore differential effects of intervention in per‐protocol analyses to challenge robustness of hypothesis and suggest refinements. Document adverse events and their predictors. |
|
| |
| Control introduction into clinical practice | Initiate surveillance program. |
They allow economy in sample size; give clarity in defining differential time trends between disease facets; and allow pre‐ and post‐ presentational states to be considered as a continuum, in a disease widely accepted as having a long prodrome. Global scores, and even relevant subscores, are relatively insensitive to intervention [101]: adding in the immutable can mask important changes.
Required for “evidence beyond reasonable doubt” of clinical importance, as with discovery of H. pylori.