Literature DB >> 19250451

The meaning of follow-up in intensive care: patients' perspective.

Sissel L Storli1, Ranveig Lind.   

Abstract

The growing understanding of correlations between experiences and memories from a period of intensive care treatment and complaints of mental character has led to the development of various patient follow-up offers. Little, however, is known about what follow-up may mean to patients. The aim of this study was to explore the meaning of patients' lived experience of being followed-up in a programme consisting of patient diaries, post-intensive care unit (ICU) conversations and visits back to the ICU. Field notes were made from encounters with patients (n = 10) during follow-up. Then they were interviewed twice, at about 6 months (n = 8) and at about 18 months (n = 6) after discharge from hospital. The first interview focused on the patients' experience during intensive care and on their reflections on the experience. The second interview had a particular focus on the meaning for each individual of the sources for understanding that they had been offered. The data was analysed by using a hermeneutic-phenomenological approach. The study corroborated earlier research that found that patients seek to understand experiences they have undergone. They search for meaning in experiences and memories. It is realized that the diary as text and photos, in addition to conveying care and love, is important to induce postexperience reflections. It provided guideposts that follow-up conversations could pursue in the patient's quest for meaning. The conversation also provided an opening for, and could in itself be essential to, the patient's willingness to talk about experiences. It allowed the nurse to accompany the patient in his quest for meaning. The return visit appeared to be significant in the patient's quest for meaning. It was via 'feeling' the room that 'things' fell into place. The study is important in elucidating aspects that are beneficial in the patient's follow-up and which lay the basis for further development of existing and new follow-up offers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19250451     DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2007.00589.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Caring Sci        ISSN: 0283-9318


  8 in total

Review 1.  Impact of follow-up consultations for ICU survivors on post-ICU syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  J F Jensen; T Thomsen; D Overgaard; M H Bestle; D Christensen; I Egerod
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2015-03-03       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  [Diaries for intensive care unit patients reduce the risk for psychological sequelae : Systematic literature review and meta-analysis].

Authors:  P Nydahl; M Fischill; T Deffner; V Neudeck; P Heindl
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2018-07-11       Impact factor: 0.840

Review 3.  Developing a framework for implementing intensive care unit diaries: a focused review of the literature.

Authors:  Muna Beg; Elizabeth Scruth; Vincent Liu
Journal:  Aust Crit Care       Date:  2016-05-27       Impact factor: 2.737

4.  Innovation and Technology: Electronic Intensive Care Unit Diaries.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Scruth; Nazanin Oveisi; Vincent Liu
Journal:  AACN Adv Crit Care       Date:  2017

5.  Patients' and Caregivers' Perceptions of Intensive Care Unit Hospitalization and Recovery.

Authors:  Mariya A Kovaleva; Abigail C Jones; Christine Cleary Kimpel; Jana L Lauderdale; Carla M Sevin; Leanne M Boehm
Journal:  Am J Crit Care       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 2.207

Review 6.  The use of diaries in psychological recovery from intensive care.

Authors:  Leanne M Aitken; Janice Rattray; Alastair Hull; Justin A Kenardy; Robyne Le Brocque; Amanda J Ullman
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 9.097

7.  Patient and carer experience of hospital-based rehabilitation from intensive care to hospital discharge: mixed methods process evaluation of the RECOVER randomised clinical trial.

Authors:  Pam Ramsay; Guro Huby; Judith Merriweather; Lisa Salisbury; Janice Rattray; David Griffith; Timothy Walsh
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Phenomenologic analysis of healthcare worker perceptions of intensive care unit diaries.

Authors:  Antoine Perier; Anne Revah-Levy; Cédric Bruel; Nathalie Cousin; Stéphanie Angeli; Sandie Brochon; François Philippart; Adeline Max; Charles Gregoire; Benoit Misset; Maité Garrouste-Orgeas
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2013-01-21       Impact factor: 9.097

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.