Literature DB >> 19250354

What do general practitioners do differently when consulting with a medical student?

Lucie Walters1, David Prideaux, Paul Worley, Jennene Greenhill, Heidi Rolfe.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The practice of having medical students see patients in a general practice setting, in their own consulting rooms, prior to the GP preceptor joining the consultation does not increase general practitioner (GP) consultation time. How do GPs meet the needs of both patient and student without extending consultation time? This study sought to quantify and compare GP consultation activities with and without students.
METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study of 523 videotaped consultations. Consultations were analysed in 15-second intervals using a modified Davis observation code to define GP activity. Estimated marginal means were calculated using mixed model analysis accounting for confounding factors.
RESULTS: In comparison with consulting alone, GPs precepting a student spent 37 seconds less time examining patients (P = 0.001), 41 seconds less on patient management, and 1 minute, 31 seconds less on clerical and other activities (P < 0.001). This created time for GPs to take a history from both the student and patient (39 seconds longer; P = 0.002) and to teach students (1 minute, 10 seconds; P < 0.001). DISCUSSION: General practitioner activity in the consultation changes significantly when precepting a student; GPs spend longer exploring the history in order to unpack the student's clinical reasoning, verify the patient's story and resynthesise the information. They spend less time on examination, management and clerical activities and presumably delegate or defer these activities. Conclusions This organising of clinical activities in order to meet the needs of both patient and student is likely to require different processing skills to solo consulting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19250354     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03276.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Educ        ISSN: 0308-0110            Impact factor:   6.251


  4 in total

1.  Pediatric procedural pain: how far have we come? An ethnographic account.

Authors:  Jo Ann F Cummings
Journal:  Pain Manag Nurs       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.929

2.  Comparison of French training and non-training general practices: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Laurent Letrilliart; Pauline Rigault-Fossier; Benoit Fossier; Nadir Kellou; Françoise Paumier; Christophe Bois; Stéphanie Polazzi; Anne-Marie Schott; Yves Zerbib
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 2.463

3.  Supervising international students in clinical placements: perceptions of experiences and factors influencing competency development.

Authors:  Stacie Attrill; Michelle Lincoln; Sue McAllister
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2016-07-16       Impact factor: 2.463

4.  Teaching points-do they occur and what do they contain? An observation study concerning the general practice rotation.

Authors:  Gertrude Florence Duncan; Lisa Marie Roth; Nobert Donner-Banzhoff; Stefan Boesner
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 2.463

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.