Literature DB >> 19250113

Magnetic resonance imaging is superior to cardiac scintigraphy to identify nonresponders to cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Miki Yokokawa1, Hiroshi Tada, Takuji Toyama, Keiko Koyama, Shigeto Naito, Shigeru Oshima, Koichi Taniguchi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Left ventricular (LV) postero-lateral scar and total scar burden are factors responsible for a poor response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) and (99m)Tc-2-methoxy isobutyl isonitrile single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) perfusion imaging are widely used to detect myocardial scar tissue; however, their ability to detect regional scars and predict a positive response to CRT has not been fully evaluated.
METHODS: CMR and SPECT were performed in 17 patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) and seven patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) before CRT. All images were scored, using a 17-segment model. To analyze the LV scar regions by CMR, we assessed the transmural delayed enhancement extent as the transmural score in each segment (0 = no scar, 4 = transmural scar). Similarly, a perfusion defect score was assigned to each segment by SPECT (0 = normal uptake, 4 = defect).
RESULTS: By both SPECT and CMR imaging, the total scar score was significantly higher in the ICM than in the DCM group. An LV postero-lateral wall scar region was detected using both imaging modes. By SPECT imaging, the percentage of regional scar score in the LV inferior wall was significantly higher in the DCM than in the ICM group.
CONCLUSIONS: By SPECT imaging in the DCM group, severe perfusion defects, due to attenuation artifacts, were frequently observed in the LV inferior wall, resulting in the overestimation of scar tissue. CMR identified nonresponders to CRT more reliably than SPECT in patients with DCM.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19250113     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2008.02227.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  2 in total

Review 1.  Nonechocardiographic imaging in evaluation for cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Wael AlJaroudi; Ji Chen; Wael A Jaber; Steven G Lloyd; Manuel D Cerqueira; Thomas Marwick
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 7.792

Review 2.  The role of cardiac magnetic resonance in identifying appropriate candidates for cardiac resynchronization therapy - a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  George Bazoukis; Jeremy Man Ho Hui; Yan Hiu Athena Lee; Oscar Hou In Chou; Dimitrios Sfairopoulos; Konstantinos Vlachos; Athanasios Saplaouras; Konstantinos P Letsas; Michael Efremidis; Gary Tse; Vassilios S Vassiliou; Panagiotis Korantzopoulos
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2022-08-31       Impact factor: 4.654

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.