Literature DB >> 19250104

Optimization of AV and VV delays in the real-world CRT patient population: an international survey on current clinical practice.

Daniel Gras1, Manish S Gupta, Eric Boulogne, Lisa Guzzo, William T Abraham.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an effective treatment for patients suffering from advanced heart failure and electrical dyssynchrony. Limited data suggest that patients may benefit from routine optimization of the atrioventricular (AV) and interventricular (VV) delays; however, there is scarce information available on how and when optimization should be performed.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this survey was to characterize the current international standard of care for optimization of the AV and VV delays in CRT devices recipients.
METHODS: Centers participating in the Frequent Optimization Survey Using the QuickOpt Method (FREEDOM) study completed surveys probing into their optimization of AV and VV delays procedures. Probes focused on the methods used to optimizing the delays, visits at which optimization of the delays was performed, percentage of patients that underwent optimization, and factors that limited centers from optimizing the CRT systems.
RESULTS: Few of the 118 investigators from 16 countries who responded to the survey routinely optimized the delays in all patients. At follow-up visits and during hospitalizations, a trend was observed to optimize the delays more often in nonresponders than in responders to CRT. Standard echocardiography was the most common method of optimization. Time availability and lack of qualified staff were the main factors limiting the optimization of CRT systems.
CONCLUSIONS: In real-world practice, AV and VV optimization was not performed in a high proportion of patients. A less time-consuming and easier optimization method might enable a more systematic optimization of the AV and VV delays at routine follow-up visits in all recipients of CRT systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19250104     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2008.02294.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  23 in total

1.  Measurement precision in the optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Robert G Turcott; Ronald M Witteles; Paul J Wang; Randall H Vagelos; Michael B Fowler; Euan A Ashley
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2010-02-22       Impact factor: 8.790

2.  Echocardiography versus intracardiac electrocardiography-based optimization for cardiac resynchronization therapy : a comparative clinical long-term trial.

Authors:  C J Jensen; A Liadski; M Bell; C K Naber; O Bruder; G V Sabin; B Küpper; H Wieneke
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.443

3.  A general framework for dose optimization.

Authors:  Robert G Turcott; Hersh Sagreiya; Euan A Ashley; Russ B Altman; Amar K Das
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2009-11-14

4.  Sex differences in optimal atrioventricular delay in patients receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Mariëlle Kloosterman; Alexander H Maass
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 5.  Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy-Emerging Therapeutic Approaches.

Authors:  Neal A Chatterjee; E Kevin Heist
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2018-03-06

6.  Left univentricular pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy using rate-adaptive atrioventricular delay.

Authors:  Li-Jin Pu; Yu Wang; Lu-Lu Zhao; Tao Guo; Shu-Min Li; Bao-Tong Hua; Ping Yang; Jun Yang; Yan-Zhou Lu; Liu-Qing Yang; Ling Zhao; Hai-Yun Luo
Journal:  J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 3.327

7.  Precision of automated QRS duration measurement in patients treated with cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Casper Lund-Andersen; Helen H Petersen; Christian Jøns; Berit T Philbert; Jacob Tfelt-Hansen; Lene T Skovgaard; Jesper H Svendsen
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 1.900

8.  Vectorcardiography-derived index allows a robust quantification of ventricular electrical synchrony.

Authors:  Juan M F Fernández; Damián N Spagnuolo; María T Politi; Iván A Tello Santacruz; Miguel Schiavone; César Cáceres Monié; Horacio A Avaca; Osvaldo Chara
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 4.996

9.  A novel methodology for AV and VV delay optimization in CRT: results from a randomized pilot clinical trial.

Authors:  Arianna Di Molfetta; Giovanni B Forleo; Luca Santini; Libera Fresiello; Lida P Papavasileiou; Giulia Magliano; Domenico Sergi; Ambrogio Capria; Francesco Romeo; Gianfranco Ferrari
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2013-03-16       Impact factor: 1.731

10.  Acute beneficial hemodynamic effects of a novel 3D-echocardiographic optimization protocol in cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Carolin Sonne; Lorenz Bott-Flügel; Simon Hauck; Hasema Lesevic; Petra Barthel; Fabian Michalk; Katharina Hoppe; Jörg Hausleiter; Albert Schömig; Christof Kolb
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-03       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.