BACKGROUND: Surveillance of intestinal metaplasia (IM) of the gastric mucosa should be limited to patients at high risk of gastric cancer. Patients with extensive IM are at increased cancer risk; however, the intragastric extent of IM is usually unknown at the time of the initial diagnosis. OBJECTIVE: To assess the predictive value of clinical, histologic, and serologic parameters for the intragastric extent of IM. DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective, multicenter study. PATIENTS: Eighty-eight patients with a previous diagnosis of IM of the gastric mucosa. INTERVENTION: Surveillance gastroscopy with extensive random biopsy sampling. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Biopsy specimens were evaluated according to the Sydney classification system. In addition, serologic testing of Helicobacter pylori and cagA status, pepsinogens I and II, gastrin, and intrinsic factor antibodies was performed. The association between the available parameters and extensive IM was evaluated with logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: In 51 patients (58%), IM was present in the biopsy specimens from at least 2 intragastric locations. The most important predictors of extensive IM were a family history of gastric cancer, alcohol use > or = 1 unit/d (1 glass, approximately 10 mL or 8 g ethanol), moderate or marked IM of the index biopsy specimen, and a pepsinogen I to II ratio < 3.0. A simple risk score based on these factors could identify extensive IM in 24 of 25 patients (sensitivity 96%). LIMITATION: A prospective cohort study should confirm the proposed risk stratification. CONCLUSIONS: A risk score of clinical, histologic, and serologic parameters can predict extensive intragastric IM and may serve as a practical tool to select patients for surveillance endoscopy in routine clinical practice.
BACKGROUND: Surveillance of intestinal metaplasia (IM) of the gastric mucosa should be limited to patients at high risk of gastric cancer. Patients with extensive IM are at increased cancer risk; however, the intragastric extent of IM is usually unknown at the time of the initial diagnosis. OBJECTIVE: To assess the predictive value of clinical, histologic, and serologic parameters for the intragastric extent of IM. DESIGN AND SETTING: Prospective, multicenter study. PATIENTS: Eighty-eight patients with a previous diagnosis of IM of the gastric mucosa. INTERVENTION: Surveillance gastroscopy with extensive random biopsy sampling. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Biopsy specimens were evaluated according to the Sydney classification system. In addition, serologic testing of Helicobacter pylori and cagA status, pepsinogens I and II, gastrin, and intrinsic factor antibodies was performed. The association between the available parameters and extensive IM was evaluated with logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: In 51 patients (58%), IM was present in the biopsy specimens from at least 2 intragastric locations. The most important predictors of extensive IM were a family history of gastric cancer, alcohol use > or = 1 unit/d (1 glass, approximately 10 mL or 8 g ethanol), moderate or marked IM of the index biopsy specimen, and a pepsinogen I to II ratio < 3.0. A simple risk score based on these factors could identify extensive IM in 24 of 25 patients (sensitivity 96%). LIMITATION: A prospective cohort study should confirm the proposed risk stratification. CONCLUSIONS: A risk score of clinical, histologic, and serologic parameters can predict extensive intragastric IM and may serve as a practical tool to select patients for surveillance endoscopy in routine clinical practice.
Authors: Michael B Cook; Sanford M Dawsey; Lena Diaw; Martin J Blaser; Guillermo I Perez-Perez; Christian C Abnet; Philip R Taylor; Demetrius Albanes; Jarmo Virtamo; Farin Kamangar Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2010-07-20 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: M Dinis-Ribeiro; M Areia; A C de Vries; R Marcos-Pinto; M Monteiro-Soares; A O'Connor; C Pereira; P Pimentel-Nunes; R Correia; A Ensari; J M Dumonceau; J C Machado; G Macedo; P Malfertheiner; T Matysiak-Budnik; F Megraud; K Miki; C O'Morain; R M Peek; T Ponchon; A Ristimaki; B Rembacken; F Carneiro; E J Kuipers Journal: Virchows Arch Date: 2011-12-22 Impact factor: 4.064
Authors: M Dinis-Ribeiro; M Areia; A C de Vries; R Marcos-Pinto; M Monteiro-Soares; A O'Connor; C Pereira; P Pimentel-Nunes; R Correia; A Ensari; J M Dumonceau; J C Machado; G Macedo; P Malfertheiner; T Matysiak-Budnik; F Megraud; K Miki; C O'Morain; R M Peek; T Ponchon; A Ristimaki; B Rembacken; F Carneiro; E J Kuipers Journal: Endoscopy Date: 2011-12-23 Impact factor: 10.093
Authors: Lisette G Capelle; Jelle Haringsma; Annemarie C de Vries; Ewout W Steyerberg; Katharina Biermann; Herman van Dekken; Ernst J Kuipers Journal: Dig Dis Sci Date: 2010-12 Impact factor: 3.199