Literature DB >> 19249421

Fondaparinux compared to enoxaparin in patients with acute coronary syndromes without ST-segment elevation: outcomes and treatment effect across different levels of risk.

Campbell D Joyner1, Ron J G Peters, Rizwan Afzal, Susan Chrolavicius, Shamir R Mehta, Keith A A Fox, Christopher B Granger, Maria Grazia Franzosi, Marcus Flather, Andrzej Budaj, Jean-Pierre Bassand, Salim Yusuf.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The OASIS-5 (Organization to Assess Strategies in Ischemic Syndromes-5) trial demonstrated that fondaparinux was noninferior to enoxaparin while reducing the risk of bleeding by 50%. The objectives of our study were to assess the effects of fondaparinux compared to enoxaparin in patients stratified by their Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) score and to examine the ability of the GRACE score to predict bleeding in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS).
METHODS: We analyzed efficacy and safety according to the GRACE admission risk score.
RESULTS: The impact of fondaparinux versus enoxaparin on the primary outcome of death, myocardial infarction, and refractory ischemia at 180 days was similar in the low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups: 7.0% versus 7.7% (hazard ratio [HR] 0.90, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.75-1.08), 10.2% versus 11.3% (HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.77-1.03), and 20.1% versus 21.1% (HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.85-1.06). Major bleeding rates were higher with increasing GRACE risk scores: 2.2%, 3.2%, and 4.1% in the low, intermediate, and high-risk groups. Six-month mortality was 2.2%, 4.2%, and 12.3% in the 3 groups. The risk of major bleeding was substantially lower with fondaparinux in all groups: 1.6% versus 2.9% (HR 0.55, 95% CI 0.39-0.77), 2.2% versus 4.1% (HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.40-0.70), 2.8% versus 5.5% (HR 0.50, 95% CI 0.38-0.64).
CONCLUSION: The GRACE score predicted both bleeding and mortality in patients with ACS. The efficacy and safety of fondaparinux were consistent in all risk groups supporting its use in a broad range of ACS patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19249421     DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2008.10.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  4 in total

1.  Development and Validation of a Prediction Rule for Benefit and Harm of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Beyond 1 Year After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Authors:  Robert W Yeh; Eric A Secemsky; Dean J Kereiakes; Sharon-Lise T Normand; Anthony H Gershlick; David J Cohen; John A Spertus; Philippe Gabriel Steg; Donald E Cutlip; Michael J Rinaldi; Edoardo Camenzind; William Wijns; Patricia K Apruzzese; Yang Song; Joseph M Massaro; Laura Mauri
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2016-04-26       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Emerging therapies for acute coronary syndromes.

Authors:  Scott M Lilly; Robert L Wilensky
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2011-10-24       Impact factor: 5.810

3.  One-Month Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Zotarolimus-Eluting Stents in High-Bleeding-Risk Patients.

Authors:  David E Kandzari; Ajay J Kirtane; Stephan Windecker; Azeem Latib; Elvin Kedhi; Roxana Mehran; Matthew J Price; Alexandre Abizaid; Daniel I Simon; Stephen G Worthley; Azfar Zaman; James W Choi; Ronald Caputo; Mihir Kanitkar; Brent McLaurin; Srinivasa Potluri; Timothy Smith; Douglas Spriggs; Thaddeus Tolleson; Tamim Nazif; Maria Parke; Lilian C Lee; Te-Hsin Lung; Gregg W Stone
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 6.546

4.  High Bleeding Risk Patients Treated with Very Thin-Strut Biodegradable Polymer or Thin-Strut Durable Polymer Drug-Eluting Stents in the BIO-RESORT Trial.

Authors:  Paolo Zocca; Marlies M Kok; Liefke C van der Heijden; Peter W Danse; Carl E Schotborgh; Martijn Scholte; Marc Hartmann; Gerard C M Linssen; Carine J M Doggen; Clemens von Birgelen
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 3.727

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.