Literature DB >> 19249242

Exonic expression profiling of breast cancer and benign lesions: a retrospective analysis.

Fabrice André1, Stefan Michiels, Philippe Dessen, Veronique Scott, Voichita Suciu, Catherine Uzan, Vladimir Lazar, Ludovic Lacroix, Gilles Vassal, Marc Spielmann, Philippe Vielh, Suzette Delaloge.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Gene-expression arrays have generated molecular predictors of relapse and drug sensitivity in breast cancer. We aimed to identify exons differently expressed in malignant and benign breast lesions and to generate a molecular classifier for breast-cancer diagnosis.
METHODS: 165 breast samples were obtained by fine-needle aspiration. Complementary DNA was hybridised on splice array. A nearest centroid prediction rule was developed to classify lesions as malignant or benign on a training set, and its performance was assessed on an independent validation set. A two-way ANOVA model identified probe sets with differential expression in malignant and benign lesions while adjusting for scan dates.
FINDINGS: 120 breast cancers and 45 benign lesions were included in the study. A molecular classifier for breast-cancer diagnosis with 1228 probe sets was generated from the training set (n=94). This signature accurately classified all samples (100% accuracy, 95% CI 96-100%). In the validation set (n=71), the molecular predictor accurately classified 68 of 71 tumours (96%, 88-99%). When the 165 samples were taken into account, 37 858 exon probe sets (5.4%) and 3733 genes (7.0%) were differently expressed in malignant and benign lesions (threshold: adjusted p<0.05). Genes involved in spliceosome assembly were significantly overexpressed in malignant disease (permutation p=0.002). In the same population of 165 samples, 956 exon probe sets presented both higher intensity and higher splice index in breast cancer than in benign lesions, although located on unchanged genes.
INTERPRETATION: Many exons are differently expressed by breast cancer and benign lesions, and alternative transcripts contribute to the molecular characteristics of breast malignancy. Development of molecular classifiers for breast-cancer diagnosis with fine-needle aspiration should be possible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19249242     DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70024-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Oncol        ISSN: 1470-2045            Impact factor:   41.316


  25 in total

1.  An empirical assessment of validation practices for molecular classifiers.

Authors:  Peter J Castaldi; Issa J Dahabreh; John P A Ioannidis
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 11.622

2.  Unsupervised Clustering of Quantitative Image Phenotypes Reveals Breast Cancer Subtypes with Distinct Prognoses and Molecular Pathways.

Authors:  Jia Wu; Yi Cui; Xiaoli Sun; Guohong Cao; Bailiang Li; Debra M Ikeda; Allison W Kurian; Ruijiang Li
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 12.531

3.  High-throughput molecular analysis from leftover of fine needle aspiration cytology of mammographically detected breast cancer.

Authors:  Laura Annaratone; Caterina Marchiò; Tommaso Renzulli; Isabella Castellano; Daniela Cantarella; Claudio Isella; Luigia Macrì; Giovanna Mariscotti; Davide Balmativola; Elisabetta Cantanna; Cristina Deambrogio; Francesca Pietribiasi; Riccardo Arisio; Fernando Schmitt; Enzo Medico; Anna Sapino
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 4.243

4.  Colorectal Neoplasia Differentially Expressed (CRNDE), a Novel Gene with Elevated Expression in Colorectal Adenomas and Adenocarcinomas.

Authors:  Lloyd D Graham; Susanne K Pedersen; Glenn S Brown; Thu Ho; Zena Kassir; Audrey T Moynihan; Emma K Vizgoft; Robert Dunne; Letitia Pimlott; Graeme P Young; Lawrence C Lapointe; Peter L Molloy
Journal:  Genes Cancer       Date:  2011-08

5.  Genome-wide association studies of maximum number of drinks.

Authors:  Yue Pan; Xingguang Luo; Xuefeng Liu; Long-Yang Wu; Qunyuan Zhang; Liang Wang; Weize Wang; Lingjun Zuo; Ke-Sheng Wang
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  2013-08-13       Impact factor: 4.791

6.  A genome-wide aberrant RNA splicing in patients with acute myeloid leukemia identifies novel potential disease markers and therapeutic targets.

Authors:  Sophia Adamia; Benjamin Haibe-Kains; Patrick M Pilarski; Michal Bar-Natan; Samuel Pevzner; Herve Avet-Loiseau; Laurence Lode; Sigitas Verselis; Edward A Fox; John Burke; Ilene Galinsky; Ibiayi Dagogo-Jack; Martha Wadleigh; David P Steensma; Gabriela Motyckova; Daniel J Deangelo; John Quackenbush; Richard Stone; James D Griffin
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 12.531

7.  Genome-wide analysis of alternative transcripts in human breast cancer.

Authors:  Ji Wen; Kevin H Toomer; Zhibin Chen; Xiaodong Cai
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2015-04-26       Impact factor: 4.872

8.  SplicerAV: a tool for mining microarray expression data for changes in RNA processing.

Authors:  Timothy J Robinson; Michaela A Dinan; Mark Dewhirst; Mariano A Garcia-Blanco; James L Pearson
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-02-25       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 9.  Multidisciplinary approach of early breast cancer: the biology applied to radiation oncology.

Authors:  Céline Bourgier; Mahmut Ozsahin; David Azria
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2010-01-14       Impact factor: 3.481

10.  Gene expression profiling identifies Fibronectin 1 and CXCL9 as candidate biomarkers for breast cancer screening.

Authors:  E Ruiz-Garcia; V Scott; C Machavoine; J M Bidart; L Lacroix; S Delaloge; F Andre
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-01-12       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.