Literature DB >> 19249134

[Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration].

Jan P Vandenbroucke1, Erik Von Elm, Douglas G Altman, Peter C Gøtzsche, Cynthia D Mulrow, Stuart J Pocock, Charles Poole, James J Schlesselman, Matthias Egger.   

Abstract

Much medical research is observational. The reporting of observational studies is often of insufficient quality. Poor reporting hampers the assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of a study and the generalisability of its results. Taking into account empirical evidence and theoretical considerations, a group of methodologists, researchers, and editors developed the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) recommendations to improve the quality of reporting of observational studies. The STROBE Statement consists of a checklist of 22 items, which relate to the title, abstract, introduction, methods, results and discussion sections of articles. Eighteen items are common to cohort studies, case-control studies and cross-sectional studies and four are specific to each of the three study designs. The STROBE Statement provides guidance to authors about how to improve the reporting of observational studies and facilitates critical appraisal and interpretation of studies by reviewers, journal editors and readers. This explanatory and elaboration document is intended to enhance the use, understanding, and dissemination of the STROBE Statement. The meaning and rationale for each checklist item are presented. For each item, one or several published examples and, where possible, references to relevant empirical studies and methodological literature are provided. Examples of useful flow diagrams are also included. The STROBE Statement, this document, and the associated Web site (http://www.strobe-statement.org/) should be helpful resources to improve reporting of observational research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19249134     DOI: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2008.12.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gac Sanit        ISSN: 0213-9111            Impact factor:   2.139


  34 in total

Review 1.  A checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies using transcranial magnetic stimulation to study the motor system: an international consensus study.

Authors:  Lucy Chipchase; Siobhan Schabrun; Leonardo Cohen; Paul Hodges; Michael Ridding; John Rothwell; Janet Taylor; Ulf Ziemann
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-05-28       Impact factor: 3.708

2.  Relationship between bone mineral density and the frequent administration of epidural steroid injections in postmenopausal women with low back pain.

Authors:  Sungyun Kim; Byeongmun Hwang
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 3.037

Review 3.  Viruses in pulp and periapical inflammation: a review.

Authors:  Scarlette Hernández Vigueras; Manuel Donoso Zúñiga; Enric Jané-Salas; Luis Salazar Navarrete; Juan José Segura-Egea; Eugenio Velasco-Ortega; José López-López
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2015-03-22       Impact factor: 2.634

Review 4.  Head and neck cancer pain: systematic review of prevalence and associated factors.

Authors:  Tatiana V Macfarlane; Tanja Wirth; Sriyani Ranasinghe; Kim W Ah-See; Nick Renny; David Hurman
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Res       Date:  2012-04-01

Review 5.  Utilization of Facet Joint and Sacroiliac Joint Interventions in Medicare Population from 2000 to 2014: Explosive Growth Continues!

Authors:  Laxmaiah Manchikanti; Joshua A Hirsch; Vidyasagar Pampati; Mark V Boswell
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2016-10

6.  Increased risk of colorectal malignant neoplasm in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a large study.

Authors:  Xian-Feng Lin; Ke-Qing Shi; Jie You; Wen-Yue Liu; Ying-Wan Luo; Fa-Ling Wu; Yong-Ping Chen; Danny Ka-Ho Wong; Man-Fung Yuen; Ming-Hua Zheng
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 2.316

7.  Autonomic nervous system function in young children with functional abdominal pain or irritable bowel syndrome.

Authors:  Monica Jarrett; Margaret Heitkemper; Danita Czyzewski; Lonnie Zeltzer; Robert J Shulman
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2012-04-20       Impact factor: 5.820

8.  The Impact of Patient Support Programs in Europe: A Systematic Literature Review.

Authors:  José Antonio Sacristán; Esther Artime; Silvia Díaz-Cerezo; Marta Comellas; Lucía Pérez-Carbonell; Luis Lizán
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 3.481

Review 9.  Systematic review reveals limitations of studies evaluating health-related quality of life after potentially curative treatment for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Marc Jacobs; Rhiannon C Macefield; Jane M Blazeby; Ida J Korfage; Mark I van Berge Henegouwen; Hanneke C J M de Haes; Ellen M Smets; Mirjam A G Sprangers
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2012-10-20       Impact factor: 4.147

10.  Enteral Nutrition by Nasogastric Tube in Adult Patients under Palliative Care: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Eduardo Sánchez-Sánchez; María Araceli Ruano-Álvarez; Jara Díaz-Jiménez; Antonio Jesús Díaz; Francisco Javier Ordonez
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 5.717

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.