Literature DB >> 19248992

Decommoditizing radiology.

Bruce I Reiner1, Eliot L Siegel.   

Abstract

The current focus on the economic bottom line in health care creates the potential for radiology to become a commodity, devoid of qualitative differentiation. This trend toward commoditization has been accelerated by the globalization of imaging services (teleradiology), increased information exchange (eg, Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine, Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise), and new technology development (eg, picture archiving and communication systems, computer-aided diagnosis). The optimum strategy for avoiding commoditization is the creation of objective quality metrics and standards throughout the medical imaging practice, which will provide a reproducible and objective means with which to differentiate imaging service deliverables on the basis of quality and clinical outcomes. These quality measures can in turn be directly tied to economic incentives (pay for performance), providing further incentive for proactive quality assurance, qualitative differentiation, and technology development centered on quality.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19248992     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2008.11.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol        ISSN: 1546-1440            Impact factor:   5.532


  9 in total

Review 1.  The insidious problem of fatigue in medical imaging practice.

Authors:  Bruce I Reiner; Elizabeth Krupinski
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Application of innovation economics to medical imaging and information systems technologies.

Authors:  Bruce I Reiner; Matthew McKinley
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 3.  Customization of medical report data.

Authors:  Bruce I Reiner
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 4.  Strategies for radiology reporting and communication. Part 1: challenges and heightened expectations.

Authors:  Bruce I Reiner
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  Creating accountability in image quality analysis. Part 4: quality analytics.

Authors:  Bruce I Reiner
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 4.056

6.  Optimizing technology development and adoption in medical imaging using the principles of innovation diffusion, part I: theoretical, historical, and contemporary considerations.

Authors:  Bruce I Reiner
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 4.056

7.  Creating accountability in image quality analysis. Part 2: medical imaging accreditation.

Authors:  Bruce I Reiner
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 4.056

8.  Enforcing Quality Metrics over Equipment Utilization Rates as Means to Reduce Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Imaging Costs and Improve Quality of Care.

Authors:  Amit Sura; Alexander Ho
Journal:  J Clin Imaging Sci       Date:  2011-05-31

Review 9.  The challenges, opportunities, and imperative of structured reporting in medical imaging.

Authors:  Bruce I Reiner
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.056

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.