Literature DB >> 19248734

Speech perception in noise using directional microphones in open-canal hearing aids.

Emily J Klemp1, Sumitrajit Dhar.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Individuals with impaired hearing find it difficult to understand speech in the presence of background noise--a problem addressed effectively by directional microphones. As open-canal fittings have become increasingly popular in the recent past, so has the debate about the effective directional benefit available from these devices.
PURPOSE: This study investigates the benefit of directional microphones in two commercially available open-canal behind-the-ear hearing aids using the Hearing in Noise Test (HINT). STUDY SAMPLE: Sixteen individuals, between 50 and 85 year of age, with high-frequency bilateral sensorineural hearing loss and no previous hearing aid experience participated in this study. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data Collection and Analysis: Individuals were asked to repeat sentences (presented at 0 degrees azimuth) in the presence of a diffuse-field uncorrelated broadband speech-shaped noise. HINT performance was compared across hearing instruments and conditions using a linear model with repeated measures.
RESULTS: There was a directional advantage of 2.6 dB as compared to the unaided condition. Average performance was worse in the omnidirectional mode as compared to the unaided condition.
CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that directional signal processing should not be precluded in open-canal instruments for listening in noisy environments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19248734     DOI: 10.3766/jaaa.19.7.7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol        ISSN: 1050-0545            Impact factor:   1.664


  5 in total

1.  The effectiveness of clear speech as a masker.

Authors:  Lauren Calandruccio; Kristin Van Engen; Sumitrajit Dhar; Ann R Bradlow
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Benefit From Directional Microphone Hearing Aids: Objective and Subjective Evaluations.

Authors:  Hee-Sung Park; Il Joon Moon; Sun Hwa Jin; Ji Eun Choi; Yang-Sun Cho; Sung Hwa Hong
Journal:  Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 3.372

Review 3.  Open Versus Closed Hearing-Aid Fittings: A Literature Review of Both Fitting Approaches.

Authors:  Alexandra Winkler; Matthias Latzel; Inga Holube
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2016-02-15       Impact factor: 3.293

4.  Speech perception and quality of life of open-fit hearing aid users.

Authors:  Tatiana Manfrini Garcia; Regina Tangerino de Souza Jacob; Maria Fernanda Capoani Garcia Mondelli
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2016 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.698

5.  Directivity and noise reduction in hearing aids: speech perception and benefit.

Authors:  Camila Angélica Quintino; Maria Fernanda Capoani Garcia Mondelli; Déborah Viviane Ferrari
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010 Sep-Oct
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.